HIHideo Inaba

Hideo Inaba

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Hideo Inaba has a total of 83 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Higher Incidences of Severe Medical Emergencies and Poorer Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes in Farmlands Compared to Other Outdoor Workplaces

    by Koichi Tanaka, Ayako Haraguchi, Takashi Iwasaki, Hideo Inaba

    Introduction: Farmland is an essential yet hazardous workplace where an aging population is engaged. This study aimed to compare the characteristics and severity of emergencies between farmlands and other outdoor workplaces and clarify whether the rurality might influence the differences between farmlands and other outdoor workplaces.


  • Association of the COVID-19 pandemic with the incidence of suicidal/self-harm emergencies in Japan: dependence of trend on the regional length of movement restriction

    by Tomoyuki Ushimoto, Koichi Tanaka, Yoshifumi Kaneto, Kento Nakajima, Hideo Inaba

    Objectives Reportedly, coronavirus disease pandemic 2019 (COVID 19) was associated with an increased rate of emergency department visits related to suicide in youth. This study analyzed the influence of the pandemic on the incidence of emergency transportation associated with suicide attempts and self-harm. Methods This retrospective cohort study used the Nationwide Emergency Medical Services Transportation Database between 2016 and 2021 for main analyses and extended database for resuscitation-attempted out-of-hospital cardiac arrests cases for secondary analyses. Results We analyzed 204,081 cases with suicidal/self-harm emergencies. Compared with corresponding periods of 4 pre-pandemic years, the incidence of suicidal/self-harm emergencies increased after the end of the first nationwide declaration of emergency and remained high in youth (incidence rate ratio; 95% lower/upper interval, 1.29; 1.22–1.37 and 1.33; 1.28–1.39,), particularly in females (1.35; 1.27–1.46 and 1.40; 1.33–1.48) during the remaining pandemic period (Phase I (June 2020 to December 2020) and Phase II (2021), respectively). Compared with other emergencies, suicidal/self-harm emergencies were associated with a much higher proportion of outpatient deaths regardless of the pandemic. Suicidal out-of-hospital cardiac arrests cases were associated with much poorer outcomes. Conclusion The incidence of suicidal/self-harm emergency transportation in youth considerably increased during COVID 19 after the end of the first state of emergency declaration in Japan. This pandemic’s impact varied among sex and region, appearing most prominently in young females. Rapid accumulation of suicidal/self-harm emergency transportation incidences may serve as an early warning sign for mental health problems and suicidality in Japan.


  • Open Access

    Survival Factors Associated with Toilet-Related Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

    by Yoshio Tanaka, Takahisa Kamikura, Hitoshi Owada, Hideo Inaba

    Objective: To identify the factors associated with a neurologically favourable survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurring in toilets. Methods: We retrospectively compared neurologically favourable 1-month survival rates and survival-related factors for 330,849 non-emergency medical service-witnessed OHCAs that occurred in toilets with those that occurred elsewhere using a nationwide database. Results: Compared to outpatient or hospital admission, OHCA was more likely to be associated with toilets (crude odds ratio [cOR] [95% confidence interval [CI]]: 2.52 [2.48–2.57]). The neurologically favourable 1-month survival rate for OHCA occurring in toilets (1.8%) was significantly lower than that in other places (2.9%) (cOR [95% CI]: 0.60 [0.53–0.68]). Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) use were minimal in toilets. Neither bystander CPR (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 1.19 [0.91–1.75]) nor AED use (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 2.05 [0.65–6.41]) was associated with improved neurologically favourable 1-month survival in toilets. Conclusions: Despite the poor neurologically favourable survival rate of OHCA in toilets, the provision of bystander CPR and AED was not associated with survival. Potential contributing factors include low rates of bystander intervention and delayed patient detection. To address this issue, focusing particular attention on unwell patients who use the toilets is crucial, and preventive approaches should be promoted.

  • Effects of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic on outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and bystander resuscitation efforts: a nationwide cohort study in Japan

    by Hisanori Kurosaki, Kazuki Okumura, Chika Nunokawa, Shintaro Yao, Kenshi Murasaka, Hideo Inaba

    Background and importance There is limited knowledge about the nationwide impact of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic in Japan on out-of -hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes.Objectives The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic on OHCA outcomes and bystander resuscitation efforts in Japan. Design Retrospective analysis of a nationwide population-based registry of OHCA cases. Settings and participants To conduct this study, we created a comprehensive database comprising 821 665 OHCA cases by combining and reconciling the OHCA database for 835 197 OHCA cases between 2017 and 2020 with another database, including location and time records. After applying exclusion and inclusion criteria, we analysed 751 617 cases.Outcome measures and analysis The primary outcome measure for this study was survival with neurologically favourable outcome (cerebral performance category 1 or 2). We compare OHCA characteristics and outcomes between prepandemic and pandemic years, and also investigated differences in factors associated with outcomes. Results We found that survival with neurologically favourable outcome and the rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) slightly increased in the pandemic year [2.8% vs. 2.9%; crude odds ratio (OR), 1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03–1.10; 54.1% vs. 55.3%, 1.05 (1.04–1.06), respectively], although the incidence of public access defibrillation (PAD) slightly decreased [1.8% vs. 1.6%, 0.89 (0.86–0.93)]. Calls for hospital selection by emergency medical service (EMS) increased during the pandemic. Subgroup analysis showed that the incidence of neurologically favourable outcome increased in 2020 for OHCA cases that occurred on nonstate of emergency days, in unaffected prefectures, with noncardiac cause, nonshockable initial rhythm, and during daytime hours. Conclusions During the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic in Japan, survival with neurologically favourable outcome of OHCA patients and bystander CPR rate did not negatively change, despite the decrement in PAD incidence. However, these effects varied with the state of emergency, region, and characteristics of OHCA, suggesting an imbalance between medical demand and supply, and raising concerns about the pandemic.


  • Prehospital Epinephrine as a Potential Factor Associated with Prehospital Rearrest

    by Akira Yamashita, Hisanori Kurosaki, Kohei Takada, Yoshio Tanaka, Taiki Nishi, Yukihio Wato, Hideo Inaba

    Objective: To investigate the impact of epinephrine on prehospital rearrest and re-attainment of prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Methods: Data for 9,292 (≥ 8 years) out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients transported to hospitals by emergency medical services were collected in Ishikawa Prefecture, Japan during 2010–2018. Univariate and multivariable analyses were retrospectively performed for 1,163 patients with prehospital ROSC. Results: Of 1,163 patients, rearrest occurred in 272 (23.4%) but not in 891 (76.6%). Both single and multiple doses of epinephrine administered before prehospital ROSC (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 3.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.42–5.46 for 1 mg, and 4.27, 2.58–6.79 for ≥2 mg) were main factors associated with rearrest. The association between initial and rearrest rhythms was significantly associated with epinephrine administration (p = 0.02). However, the rearrest rhythm was primarily associated with the initial rhythm (p < 0.01). The majority of patients with the non-shockable initial rhythm had pulseless electrical activity (PEA) as the rearrest rhythm, regardless of epinephrine administration (80.4% for administration, 81.6% for no administration). When the initial rhythm was shockable, the primary rearrest rhythms in patients with and without epinephrine administration before prehospital ROSC were PEA (52.2%) and ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia (56.8%), respectively. Only epinephrine administration after rearrest was associated with prehospital re-attainment of ROSC (adjusted OR: 2.49, 95% CI: 1.20–5.19). Stepwise multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that neurologically favorable outcome was poorer in patients with rearrest than those without rearrest (9.9% vs. 25.0%, adjusted OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.23–0.73). The total prehospital doses of epinephrine were associated with poorer neurological outcome in a dose-dependent manner (adjusted OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.13–0.36 for 1 mg; 0.09, 0.04–0.19 for 2 mg; 0.03, 0.01–0.09 for ≥3 mg, no epinephrine as a reference). Transportation to hospitals with a unit for post-resuscitation care was associated with better neurological outcome (adjusted OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.02–2.32). Conclusions: The requirement for epinephrine administration before prehospital ROSC was associated with subsequent rearrest. Routine epinephrine administrations and rearrest were associated with poorer neurological outcome of OHCA patients with prehospital ROSC.


  • Open Access

    Association of school hours with outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in schoolchildren

    by Akira Yamashita, Hisanori Kurosaki, Kohei Takada, Yoshio Tanaka, Yoshitaka Hamada, Tetsuya Ishita, Minoru Kubo, Hideo Inaba

    Objective To investigate the association of school hours with outcomes of schoolchildren with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods From the 2005–2014 nationwide databases, we extracted the data for 1660 schoolchildren (6–17 years) with bystander-witnessed OHCA. Univariate analyses followed by propensity-matching procedures and stepwise logistic regression analyses were applied. School hours were defined as 08:00 to 18:00. Results The neurologically favourable 1-month survival rate during school hours was better than that during non-school hours only on school days: 18.4% and 10.5%, respectively. During school hours on school days, patients with OHCA more frequently received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and public access defibrillation (PAD), and had a shockable initial rhythm and presumed cardiac aetiology. The neurologically favourable 1-month survival rate did not significantly differ between school hours on school days and all other times of day after propensity score matching: 16.4% vs 16.1% (unadjusted OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.51). Stepwise logistic regression analysis during school hours on school days revealed that shockable initial rhythm (adjusted OR 2.44; 95% CI 1.12 to 5.42), PAD (adjusted OR 3.32; 95% CI 1.23 to 9.10), non-exogenous causes (adjusted OR 5.88; 95% CI 1.85 to 20.0) and a shorter emergency medical service (EMS) response time (adjusted OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.32) and witness-to-first CPR interval (adjusted OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.15) were major factors associated with an improved neurologically favourable 1-month survival rate. Conclusions School hours are not an independent factor associated with improved outcomes of OHCA in schoolchildren. The time delays in CPR and EMS arrival were independently associated with poor outcomes during school hours on school days.


  • Temporal variations in dispatcher-assisted and bystander-initiated resuscitation efforts

    by Akira Yamashita, Tetsuo Maeda, Yasuhiro Myojo, Yukihiro Wato, Keisuke Ohta, Hideo Inaba


  • Involvement of school children in basic life support. Where? How frequently? How did they act?

    by Hideo Inaba, Hisanori Kurosaki, Yukihiro Wato, Yasuhiro Myojo