Karl-Heinz Erb
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Karl-Heinz Erb has a total of 529 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Helmut Haberl
Institute of Social Ecology, BOKU University, Vienna, Austria
83 shared publications - Fridolin Krausmann
Institute of Social Ecology, BOKU University, Vienna, Austria
46 shared publications - Simone Gingrich
Institute of Social Ecology, BOKU University, 1070 Vienna, Austria
31 shared publications - Thomas Kastner
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), Frankfurt am Main, Germany
26 shared publications - Sarah Matej
Institute of Social Ecology University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna Vienna Austria
25 shared publications Christian Lauk
Institute of Social Ecology University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna Austria
16 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 11 June 2026
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 392 (6803) , 1161-1166
Assessing the net climate benefits of improved grazing intensity in global rangelands
Improved rangeland grazing could mitigate climate change through carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) sequestration in soils and vegetation. However, altering grazing practices to increase ecosystem carbon storage may also decrease livestock production and/or increase greenhouse gas emissions through the supply chain, such that the net emissions impacts remain unclear. Here, we assess the global net mitigation potential of improving grazing intensity by quantifying potential CO 2 sequestration alongside systems-level impacts of plant productivity changes, livestock emissions, feed requirements, and production constraints. Improving grazing intensity in global rangelands could sequester 2.2 ± 0.43 gigatons of carbon dioxide equivalent (Gt/CO 2 eq) per year in the near term, but maintaining livestock production through supplemental feeding would reduce net mitigation by 2 to 31% (to 1.8 ± 0.45 GT/CO 2 eq per year). Our results suggest that neglecting systems-level emissions impacts may substantially overestimate the global climate benefits of improved grazing.
- 11 June 2026
- Published by American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Science
- Vol. 392 (6803) , 1161-1166
Assessing the net climate benefits of improved grazing intensity in global rangelands
Improved rangeland grazing could mitigate climate change through carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) sequestration in soils and vegetation. However, altering grazing practices to increase ecosystem carbon storage may also decrease livestock production and/or increase greenhouse gas emissions through the supply chain, such that the net emissions impacts remain unclear. Here, we assess the global net mitigation potential of improving grazing intensity by quantifying potential CO 2 sequestration alongside systems-level impacts of plant productivity changes, livestock emissions, feed requirements, and production constraints. Improving grazing intensity in global rangelands could sequester 2.2 ± 0.43 gigatons of carbon dioxide equivalent (Gt/CO 2 eq) per year in the near term, but maintaining livestock production through supplemental feeding would reduce net mitigation by 2 to 31% (to 1.8 ± 0.45 GT/CO 2 eq per year). Our results suggest that neglecting systems-level emissions impacts may substantially overestimate the global climate benefits of improved grazing.
- Open Access
- 28 January 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Ecological Indicators
- Vol. 183
Tracking biodiversity footprints embodied in the global supply chains of agricultural commodities: the examples of Germany and China
- 28 January 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Ecological Indicators
- Vol. 183
Open AccessTracking biodiversity footprints embodied in the global supply chains of agricultural commodities: the examples of Germany and China
- Open Access
- 22 July 2025
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
- Vol. 130 (7)
A Parsimonious Downscaling Method for Global Potential Net Primary Production: From 30 arcmin to 30 arcsec Resolution
The impact of land use on ecosystems has reached critical levels, jeopardizing biosphere integrity. A key indicator that quantifies, monitors, and analyses such impacts is the Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production (HANPP). Assessing HANPP consists of a comparison of actual net primary production and potential vegetation properties—i.e., vegetation properties that would prevail in the absence of land use (i.e., the NPP of the potential vegetation; NPPpot). While technical advancements in remote sensing have led to global land cover data at high spatial resolution up to 30 arcsec (i.e., 1 km at the equator) and higher, spatial explicit global NPPpot, mainly provided by Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs), are usually generated at 30 arcmin (i.e., 55 km at the equator). This spatial mismatch causes uncertainties in HANPP assessments. We here present a workable solution for downscaling NPPpot until global, high‐resolution results, for example, from DGVMs, become feasible. This method uses a simple NPPpot model with readily available auxiliary information at higher spatial resolution to generate fine‐scale patterns to downscale high‐quality coarse scale NPPpot. It includes a smoothing procedure to reduce downscaling artifacts. We demonstrate this Smooth Auxiliary Data (SAD) downscaling by applying it to NPPpot results from the LPJ‐GUESS DGVM model for the year 2010 to downscale from 30 arcmin to 30 arcsec resolution. This approach generates fine‐scaled NPPpot patterns and aligns with alternative models for smaller geographic units while computational cost is acceptable.
- 22 July 2025
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
- Vol. 130 (7)
Open AccessA Parsimonious Downscaling Method for Global Potential Net Primary Production: From 30 arcmin to 30 arcsec Resolution
The impact of land use on ecosystems has reached critical levels, jeopardizing biosphere integrity. A key indicator that quantifies, monitors, and analyses such impacts is the Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production (HANPP). Assessing HANPP consists of a comparison of actual net primary production and potential vegetation properties—i.e., vegetation properties that would prevail in the absence of land use (i.e., the NPP of the potential vegetation; NPPpot). While technical advancements in remote sensing have led to global land cover data at high spatial resolution up to 30 arcsec (i.e., 1 km at the equator) and higher, spatial explicit global NPPpot, mainly provided by Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs), are usually generated at 30 arcmin (i.e., 55 km at the equator). This spatial mismatch causes uncertainties in HANPP assessments. We here present a workable solution for downscaling NPPpot until global, high‐resolution results, for example, from DGVMs, become feasible. This method uses a simple NPPpot model with readily available auxiliary information at higher spatial resolution to generate fine‐scale patterns to downscale high‐quality coarse scale NPPpot. It includes a smoothing procedure to reduce downscaling artifacts. We demonstrate this Smooth Auxiliary Data (SAD) downscaling by applying it to NPPpot results from the LPJ‐GUESS DGVM model for the year 2010 to downscale from 30 arcmin to 30 arcsec resolution. This approach generates fine‐scaled NPPpot patterns and aligns with alternative models for smaller geographic units while computational cost is acceptable.
- Open Access
- 13 July 2025
- Published by Wiley
A Parsimonious Downscaling Method for Global Potential Net Primary Production: From 30arcmin to 30arcsec Resolution
The impact of land use on ecosystems has reached critical levels, jeopardizing biosphere integrity. A key indicator that quantifies, monitors, and analyses such impacts is the Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production (HANPP). Assessing HANPP consists of a comparison of actual net primary production and potential vegetation properties - that is vegetation properties that would prevail in the absence of land use (i.e., the NPP of the potential vegetation; NPPpot). While technical advancements in remote sensing have led to global land cover data at high spatial resolution up to 30arcsec (i.e. 1km at the equator) and higher, spatial explicit global NPPpot, mainly provided by Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs), are usually generated at 30arcmin (i.e. 55km at the equator). This spatial mismatch causes uncertainties in HANPP assessments. We here present a workable solution for downscaling NPPpot until global, high-resolution results e.g. from DGVMs become feasible. This method uses a simple NPPpot model with readily available auxiliary information at higher spatial resolution to generate fine-scale patterns to downscale high-quality coarse scale NPPpot. It includes a smoothing procedure to reduce downscaling artifacts. We demonstrate this Smooth Auxiliary Data (SAD) downscaling by applying it to NPPpot results from the LPJ-GUESS DGVM model for the year 2010 to downscale from 30arcmin to 30arcsec resolution. This approach generates fine-scaled NPPpot patterns and aligns with alternative models for smaller geographic units, while computational cost is acceptable.
- 13 July 2025
- Published by Wiley
Open AccessA Parsimonious Downscaling Method for Global Potential Net Primary Production: From 30arcmin to 30arcsec Resolution
The impact of land use on ecosystems has reached critical levels, jeopardizing biosphere integrity. A key indicator that quantifies, monitors, and analyses such impacts is the Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production (HANPP). Assessing HANPP consists of a comparison of actual net primary production and potential vegetation properties - that is vegetation properties that would prevail in the absence of land use (i.e., the NPP of the potential vegetation; NPPpot). While technical advancements in remote sensing have led to global land cover data at high spatial resolution up to 30arcsec (i.e. 1km at the equator) and higher, spatial explicit global NPPpot, mainly provided by Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs), are usually generated at 30arcmin (i.e. 55km at the equator). This spatial mismatch causes uncertainties in HANPP assessments. We here present a workable solution for downscaling NPPpot until global, high-resolution results e.g. from DGVMs become feasible. This method uses a simple NPPpot model with readily available auxiliary information at higher spatial resolution to generate fine-scale patterns to downscale high-quality coarse scale NPPpot. It includes a smoothing procedure to reduce downscaling artifacts. We demonstrate this Smooth Auxiliary Data (SAD) downscaling by applying it to NPPpot results from the LPJ-GUESS DGVM model for the year 2010 to downscale from 30arcmin to 30arcsec resolution. This approach generates fine-scaled NPPpot patterns and aligns with alternative models for smaller geographic units, while computational cost is acceptable.
- Open Access
- 27 March 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Data
- Vol. 12 (1) , 1-20
A global land-use data cube 1992–2020 based on the Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production
Land use is intimately linked to key components of the Earth system, including the climate system, biodiversity and biogeochemical cycles. Advanced understanding of patterns and dynamics of land use is vital for assessing impacts on these system components and for developing strategies to ensure sustainability. However, thematically detailed data that enable the analyses of spatiotemporal dynamics of land use, including land-use intensity, are currently lacking. This study presents a comprehensive land-use data cube (LUIcube) that traces global land-use area and intensity developments between 1992 and 2020 annually at 30 arcsecond spatial resolution. It discerns 32 land-use classes that can be aggregated to cropland, grazing land, forestry, built-up land and wilderness. Land-use intensity is represented through the framework of Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production, which allows to quantify changes in NPP, respectively biomass flows, induced by land conversion and land-management. The LUIcube provides the necessary database for analyzing the role of natural and socioeconomic drivers of land-use change and its ecological impacts to inform strategies for sustainable land management.
- 27 March 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Data
- Vol. 12 (1) , 1-20
Open AccessA global land-use data cube 1992–2020 based on the Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production
Land use is intimately linked to key components of the Earth system, including the climate system, biodiversity and biogeochemical cycles. Advanced understanding of patterns and dynamics of land use is vital for assessing impacts on these system components and for developing strategies to ensure sustainability. However, thematically detailed data that enable the analyses of spatiotemporal dynamics of land use, including land-use intensity, are currently lacking. This study presents a comprehensive land-use data cube (LUIcube) that traces global land-use area and intensity developments between 1992 and 2020 annually at 30 arcsecond spatial resolution. It discerns 32 land-use classes that can be aggregated to cropland, grazing land, forestry, built-up land and wilderness. Land-use intensity is represented through the framework of Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production, which allows to quantify changes in NPP, respectively biomass flows, induced by land conversion and land-management. The LUIcube provides the necessary database for analyzing the role of natural and socioeconomic drivers of land-use change and its ecological impacts to inform strategies for sustainable land management.
- Open Access
- 19 January 2024
- Published by IOP Publishing in Environmental Research Letters
- Vol. 19 (2) , 024011
Livestock increasingly drove global agricultural emissions growth from 1910–2015
Emissions from agricultural activities constitute 11% of global greenhouse gas emissions and are hard to abate. Here, we present and analyze a consistent empirical assessment of global emissions from agricultural activities from 1910–2015. Agricultural emissions increased 3.5-fold from 1910–2015, from 1.9 to 6.7 GtCO2eq yr−1. CH4 emissions, emissions from enteric fermentation and from livestock products contributed the highest fractions of emissions by gases, processes, and products, respectively. A decomposition analysis quantifies the contribution of major drivers of agricultural emissions dynamics. It reveals that globally and across the entire period, changes in population, agricultural production per capita (‘output’), regional distribution of production (‘regional mix’), and composition of final products (‘product mix’, i.e. a shift towards livestock production) all contributed to increasing agricultural emissions. Conversely, declining emissions per unit of production (‘emissions intensity’), particularly for livestock, partly counterbalanced the emissions increase. Significant variations prevail across regions and time periods. Most notably, the composition of final products counteracted agricultural emissions increase from 1910–1950, but growing livestock production has become an increasingly important driver of emissions growth in more recent periods. This finding unravels that increases in livestock production offset the improvements in emissions intensity of industrial agricultural intensification. Our findings underscore the large potential of reducing livestock production and consumption for mitigating the climate impacts of agriculture.
- 19 January 2024
- Published by IOP Publishing in Environmental Research Letters
- Vol. 19 (2) , 024011
Open AccessLivestock increasingly drove global agricultural emissions growth from 1910–2015
Emissions from agricultural activities constitute 11% of global greenhouse gas emissions and are hard to abate. Here, we present and analyze a consistent empirical assessment of global emissions from agricultural activities from 1910–2015. Agricultural emissions increased 3.5-fold from 1910–2015, from 1.9 to 6.7 GtCO2eq yr−1. CH4 emissions, emissions from enteric fermentation and from livestock products contributed the highest fractions of emissions by gases, processes, and products, respectively. A decomposition analysis quantifies the contribution of major drivers of agricultural emissions dynamics. It reveals that globally and across the entire period, changes in population, agricultural production per capita (‘output’), regional distribution of production (‘regional mix’), and composition of final products (‘product mix’, i.e. a shift towards livestock production) all contributed to increasing agricultural emissions. Conversely, declining emissions per unit of production (‘emissions intensity’), particularly for livestock, partly counterbalanced the emissions increase. Significant variations prevail across regions and time periods. Most notably, the composition of final products counteracted agricultural emissions increase from 1910–1950, but growing livestock production has become an increasingly important driver of emissions growth in more recent periods. This finding unravels that increases in livestock production offset the improvements in emissions intensity of industrial agricultural intensification. Our findings underscore the large potential of reducing livestock production and consumption for mitigating the climate impacts of agriculture.
- Open Access
- 11 January 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Cleaner Production
- Vol. 437, 140712
Options for reducing a city's global biodiversity footprint – The case of food consumption in Vienna
- 11 January 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Cleaner Production
- Vol. 437, 140712
Open AccessOptions for reducing a city's global biodiversity footprint – The case of food consumption in Vienna
- Open Access
- 2 January 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Data
- Vol. 11 (1) , 1-34
A global dataset on phosphorus in agricultural soils
Numerous drivers such as farming practices, erosion, land-use change, and soil biogeochemical background, determine the global spatial distribution of phosphorus (P) in agricultural soils. Here, we revised an approach published earlier (called here GPASOIL-v0), in which several global datasets describing these drivers were combined with a process model for soil P dynamics to reconstruct the past and current distribution of P in cropland and grassland soils. The objective of the present update, called GPASOIL-v1, is to incorporate recent advances in process understanding about soil inorganic P dynamics, in datasets to describe the different drivers, and in regional soil P measurements for benchmarking. We trace the impact of the update on the reconstructed soil P. After the update we estimate a global averaged inorganic labile P of 187 kgP ha−1 for cropland and 91 kgP ha−1 for grassland in 2018 for the top 0–0.3 m soil layer, but these values are sensitive to the mineralization rates chosen for the organic P pools. Uncertainty in the driver estimates lead to coefficients of variation of 0.22 and 0.54 for cropland and grassland, respectively. This work makes the methods for simulating the agricultural soil P maps more transparent and reproducible than previous estimates, and increases the confidence in the new estimates, while the evaluation against regional dataset still suggests rooms for further improvement.
- 2 January 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Data
- Vol. 11 (1) , 1-34
Open AccessA global dataset on phosphorus in agricultural soils
Numerous drivers such as farming practices, erosion, land-use change, and soil biogeochemical background, determine the global spatial distribution of phosphorus (P) in agricultural soils. Here, we revised an approach published earlier (called here GPASOIL-v0), in which several global datasets describing these drivers were combined with a process model for soil P dynamics to reconstruct the past and current distribution of P in cropland and grassland soils. The objective of the present update, called GPASOIL-v1, is to incorporate recent advances in process understanding about soil inorganic P dynamics, in datasets to describe the different drivers, and in regional soil P measurements for benchmarking. We trace the impact of the update on the reconstructed soil P. After the update we estimate a global averaged inorganic labile P of 187 kgP ha−1 for cropland and 91 kgP ha−1 for grassland in 2018 for the top 0–0.3 m soil layer, but these values are sensitive to the mineralization rates chosen for the organic P pools. Uncertainty in the driver estimates lead to coefficients of variation of 0.22 and 0.54 for cropland and grassland, respectively. This work makes the methods for simulating the agricultural soil P maps more transparent and reproducible than previous estimates, and increases the confidence in the new estimates, while the evaluation against regional dataset still suggests rooms for further improvement.
- Open Access
- 29 October 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Data in Brief
- Vol. 51, 109725
Product level dataset on embodied human appropriation of net primary production
- 29 October 2023
- Published by Elsevier in Data in Brief
- Vol. 51, 109725
Open AccessProduct level dataset on embodied human appropriation of net primary production