Sofia Lingegård

Sofia Lingegård

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Sofia Lingegård has a total of 42 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Operationalizing circularity in healthcare: Rethinking single-use for sustainable practice

    by Sofia Lingegård, Johannes Matschewsky, Thomas Budde Christensen, Nikoline Oturai, Kristian Syberg

    The healthcare sector is a major consumer of plastics, with single-use gloves among the most frequently used items. Their use has increased significantly over recent decades, with the COVID-19 pandemic further accelerating this trend. Despite this, little is known about the drivers of glove consumption or how it might be reduced. This study examines the use of single-use plastic gloves in healthcare settings in two Scandinavian countries, drawing on interviews with 26 respondents, observational data, and document analysis. Findings reveal substantial overuse, misuse, and unnecessary disposal driven by behavioral norms, institutional practices, procurement routines, and product design. The study examines how circular strategies (R-strategies) can be applied to enhance the effective and efficient use of gloves, emphasizing the often-overlooked importance of the use phase. Behavioral change among staff emerges as more impactful than top-down policy alone, underscoring a gap between strategic goals and daily practices. The article identifies key opportunities and barriers to implementing circular solutions, offering insights relevant to researchers, healthcare professionals, procurement officers, and policymakers. Immediate practical implications center on adjusting staff routines and incentives, while further research is needed into mechanisms bridging the gap between environmental targets and medical professionals’ everyday decision-making.

  • Open Access

    Sustainable public food procurement: criteria and actors’ roles and influence

    by Elvira Molin, Sofia Lingegård, Michael Martin, Anna Björklund

    Food production and consumption significantly contribute to climate change. The public sector, which procures large quantities of food, has a crucial role in steering toward more sustainable food systems. More empirical studies involving practitioners are called for to understand the complexity of sustainable public food procurement. This study examines how actors interpret and implement sustainability in food procurement, as well as their influence on this process. A comprehensive analysis of multi-actor collaboration and stakeholder engagement involving interviews with key actors such as procurement officers, wholesalers, chefs, and food producers is presented. Findings highlight a consensus on the need for sustainability measures, such as purchasing local and organic products. The results showcase the potential transformation of power dynamics within the supply chain in response to modifications in procurement standards toward local produce and the overuse of product-specific criteria. However, assuming that local is invariably sustainable carries the risk of falling into the “local trap” when the consequence of procuring local varies and requires further investigation. The influence of system-level factors, including market dynamics and regulatory frameworks, plays a significant role in implementing sustainable procurement, as well as alignment and coordination in the supply chain.


  • Open Access

    Implementation and management of a circular public procurement contract for furniture

    by Sofia Lingegård, Kristina von Oelreich

    Circular public procurement (CPP) is one way to increase sustainability and circularity in public spending. As previous research focuses primarily on procurement, more insight is needed on the latter stages CPP. Real-life examples of CPP implementation are also required to promote the concept to practitioners, improve governance, and add depth to the literature. This study, therefore, provides in-depth knowledge of CPP implementation and management by analyzing a case of circular furniture flows and its implications for the procuring organization. The focus on furniture is motivated by the large volumes sent to landfills every year despite its remanufacturing potential, as well as the large environmental impact for production, a potentially long lifetime, and an often-high purchasing price. The results show that strategic decisions to prioritize sustainability are necessary when resource efficiency and cost reductions do not align in a short-term perspective. A more centralized governance structure facilitates decisions on reuse, remanufacturing and disposal in an organization, e.g., coordination of products for remanufacturing, pooling products for reuse, and standardization of design choices. Follow-up and inventory systems are crucial tools for integrating previously installed products with CPP, keeping track of circular flows, and providing feedback to improve subsequent procurements. Crucial elements in the follow-up include adaptation to circularity in the economy system and accounting for the prolonged life and reuse of furniture. The study's results emphasize how an organization's prerequisites play an essential part in the implementation of CPP and that contextual solutions are needed for circular challenges. The study contributes to the fields of policy implementation, CPP, and the use of circular business models in a public context, as well as to the less explored field of procurement in a circular economy context. Suggestions for future research include studies on product categories with other environmental impact profiles, and on waste management regulations that can make or break circular systems.


  • Open Access

    Using stakeholder perceptions to deepen the understanding of beachcast governance and management practices on Gotland, Sweden

    by Hanna Nathaniel, Daniel Franzén, Sofia Lingegård, Frida Franzén, Tore Söderqvist, Fredrik Gröndahl


  • Open Access

    Innovation outcomes and processes in infrastructure projects – a comparative study of Design-Build and Design-Build-Maintenance contracts

    by Johan Larsson, Per Erik Eriksson, Sofia Lingegård, Anna-Therése Järvenpää

    Innovation is often seen as essential for long-term development in the construction industry, but its actual outcomes and processes in construction projects require more attention. Many studies on procurement strategies and delivery systems have focussed on the public transport infrastructure sector, whereas most construction innovation scholars have addressed the innovation phenomenon in construction generally. Thus, the purpose of this study is to compare how two delivery systems, design-build (DB) and design-build-maintenance (DBM), influence project-level innovation. Findings are based on empirical data from a multiple case study of six infrastructure projects, three with DB contracts and three with DBM contracts, in which 12 innovations are identified, described, and compared. The findings show that various kinds of innovations in terms of outcomes and processes are implemented in infrastructure projects, and that the delivery system do effect both dimensions. Long maintenance responsibilities tend to spur contractors to engage in early exploration of sustainable solutions that could be of long-term benefit. The research contributes to procurement literature by exemplifying how delivery systems influence both the outcomes and processes of project-level innovations. It also increases our knowledge about construction innovation as a multi-dimensional phenomenon.


  • Open Access

    Cost–benefit analysis of beach-cast harvest: Closing land-marine nutrient loops in the Baltic Sea region

    by Tore Söderqvist, Hanna Nathaniel, Daniel Franzén, Frida Franzén, Linus Hasselström, Fredrik Gröndahl, Rajib Sinha, Johanna Stadmark, Åsa Strand, Ida Ingmansson, et al.

    Harvesting beach-cast can help mitigate marine eutrophication by closing land-marine nutrient loops and provide a blue biomass raw material for the bioeconomy. Cost–benefit analysis was applied to harvest activities during 2009–2018 on the island of Gotland in the Baltic Sea, highlighting benefits such as nutrient removal from the marine system and improved recreational opportunities as well as costs of using inputs necessary for harvest. The results indicate that the activities entailed a net gain to society, lending substance to continued funding for harvests on Gotland and assessments of upscaling of harvest activities to other areas in Sweden and elsewhere. The lessons learnt from the considerable harvest experience on Gotland should be utilized for developing concrete guidelines for carrying out sustainable harvest practice, paying due attention to local conditions but also to what can be generalized to a wider national and international context.


  • Open Access

    Circular Public Procurement through Integrated Contracts in the Infrastructure Sector

    by Sofia Lingegård, Malena I. Havenvid, Per-Erik Eriksson

    Public clients’ procurement strategies are central in facilitating innovation towards sustainability. In the infrastructure sector, the three main project activities—design, production, and maintenance—are traditionally not procured in an integrated way, which results in sub-optimizations and a lack of life cycle perspective. As project actors are accustomed to traditional, non-integrated forms of contract, implementing integrated contracts imposes fundamental changes to the interdependencies among actors, resources, and activities. This study analyzes the interfaces among key project actors and the related interdependencies across design, production, and maintenance in Design–Build–Maintain contracts, and initiates a discussion on how to manage these interdependencies when implementing integrated contracts. This study of circular public procurement (CPP) focused on three infrastructure projects using integrated contracting and applied the industrial network approach (INA) to analyze interdependencies in how they may influence innovation and sustainable development. The study found significant obstacles to clients obtaining the benefits of integrated contracting and concludes that understanding interdependencies is necessary to implement integrated contracts successfully. The study contributes to the construction management literature by adapting the INA to contracting, and to the CPP literature by providing empirical evidence of sustainability and circularity in infrastructure projects.