ALAlexis Luna

Alexis Luna

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Alexis Luna has a total of 179 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes and Recurrence After Hiatal Hernia Repair: A Comparison of Sliding and Paraesophageal Hernias

    by Núria Llorach-Perucho, Noelia Pérez-Romero, Alexis Luna-Aufroy, Sandra Montmany-Vioque, Montse Adell-Trapé, Ariadna Cidoncha-Secilla, Christian J. Herrero-Vicente, Andrea Torrecilla-Portolés, Laura Mora-López

    Background/Objectives: Sliding and paraesophageal/mixed hiatal hernias differ anatomically and clinically, although surgical outcomes are frequently analyzed together. This study compared postoperative functional outcomes and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) requirements according to hernia type and explored recurrence patterns as secondary outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively maintained database of consecutive patients undergoing hiatal hernia repair at a tertiary referral center between May 2014 and September 2023. Patients were classified as sliding (type I) or paraesophageal/mixed hernias. Symptoms were assessed using an 11-item Likert questionnaire. Functional changes were evaluated using paired analyses in patients with available preoperative and postoperative assessments. Recurrence-free survival was estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis, with exploratory Cox regression for symptomatic recurrence. Results: Seventy-seven patients were included (37 sliding; 40 paraesophageal/mixed). Sliding hernias showed a predominantly reflux-related phenotype, whereas paraesophageal/mixed hernias were characterized by more obstructive symptoms and dysphagia. Paired analyses confirmed significant improvement in reflux-related symptoms after sliding hernia repair and in obstructive symptoms and dysphagia after paraesophageal/mixed hernia repair. PPI requirements decreased significantly in both groups. Symptomatic recurrence occurred in 12 patients (15.6%) and was more frequent after paraesophageal/mixed repair (log-rank p = 0.011). In an exploratory Cox model stratified by sex and adjusted for age and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, paraesophageal/mixed hernia was associated with a higher hazard of symptomatic recurrence (HR 4.87, 95% CI 1.00–23.74; p = 0.050), although estimates were imprecise. Radiologically documented anatomical recurrence occurred in 15 patients (19.5%) and differed between groups over time (log-rank p < 0.001); postoperative imaging was symptom-driven and therefore did not represent systematic anatomical surveillance. Revisional surgery was required in 6.5% of patients. Conclusions: Sliding and paraesophageal/mixed hiatal hernias showed distinct clinical, surgical, and functional phenotypes. Exploratory analyses also suggested different recurrence patterns, although these findings require cautious interpretation because of the limited number of events, residual confounding, and non-systematic postoperative imaging.

  • Impact of frailty on outcomes in older patients after curative gastrectomy for cancer: a matched-pair analysis

    by Mariagiulia Dal Cero, Laura Martí-Gelonch, Emma Eizaguirre, Helena Salvador, Concepción Yarnoz, Coro Miranda, Fernando Estremiana, Mónica Miró, Sandra Castro, Amaia Gantxegi, et al.

  • Open Access

    Clinical-genetic predisposition and medium-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: A 5-year validation of the OBEGEN score

    by Marta Zorzano-Martínez, Aaron Switzer-Rodríguez, Marta Bueno, Fernando Herrerías, Assumpta Caixàs, Alexis Luna, Andreea Ciudin, Carlos G. Petrola, Nuria Vilarrasa, Claudio Lazzara, et al.

  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    Body Composition Changes After Bariatric Surgery: Magnitude, Timing, and Determinants of Excessive Fat-Free Mass Loss

    by Noelia Perez-Romero, Montse Adell Trapé, Assumpta Caixàs, Ariadna Cidoncha Secilla, Christian Jose Herrero Vicente, Marina Luengo Moral, Alba Hernandez-Lazaro, Alexis Luna Aufroy

    Background: Bariatric surgery effectively treats severe obesity, but postoperative weight loss includes reductions in both fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM). Excessive FFM loss may increase the risk of sarcopenia, frailty, and long-term weight regain, yet its magnitude and determinants are not fully established. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected cohort of 179 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass between January 2020 and December 2022. Anthropometric parameters and body composition (bioelectrical impedance analysis) were measured preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months. The proportion of FFM loss relative to total weight loss (%FFML/WL) was calculated, and excessive FFM loss was defined using published cut-offs (≥25%, ≥30%, and ≥35%). Predictors of FFM preservation were assessed through stepwise regression. Results: Baseline BMI was 44.1 ± 4.6 kg/m2, FM 54.6 ± 10.7 kg, and FFM 61.1 ± 11.9 kg. At 6 and 12 months, BMI decreased to 31.0 ± 4.2 and 28.8 ± 4.4 kg/m2, respectively; FM decreased to 35.6 ± 11.0 and 22.0 ± 10.0 kg; and FFM to 54.7 ± 9.5 and 50.1 ± 7.0 kg (all p < 0.001). Most FFM loss occurred within the first 6 months (mean − 6.4 kg). Median %FFML/WL was 26.4% at 6 months and 28.7% at 12 months. Excessive FFM loss affected 41–46% of patients (≥25%), 27–31% (≥30%), and 14% (≥35%). In multivariable analysis, FFM at 6 months was the only independent predictor of FFM at 12 months (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Bariatric surgery leads to substantial FM and FFM reductions, with nearly half of patients exceeding established %FFML/WL alert thresholds. Early postoperative body composition monitoring may help identify individuals at higher risk of FFM depletion and guide preventive strategies such as adequate protein intake and resistance training.


  • Robotic gastrectomy: can it be implemented without compromising the results?

    by Alexis Luna, Noelia Pérez-Romero, Pere Rebasa, Montse Adell, Sandra Montmany, Ariadna Cidoncha, Christian Herrero, Laura Mora

  • Open Access

    Prognostic Relevance of Preoperative Immune, Inflammatory, and Nutritional Biomarkers in Patients Undergoing Gastrectomy for Resectable Gastric Adenocarcinoma: An Observational Multicentre Study

    by Jaume Tur-Martínez, Joaquín Rodríguez-Santiago, Javier Osorio, Mònica Miró, Concepción Yarnoz, Mariona Jofra, Georgina Ferret, Helena Salvador-Roses, Sonia Fernández-Ananín, Arantxa Clavell, et al.

    Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate different preoperative immune, inflammatory, and nutritional scores and their best cut-off values as predictors of poorer overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients who underwent curative gastric cancer resection. Methods: This was a retrospective observational multicentre study based on data of the Spanish EURECCA Esophagogastric Cancer Registry. Time-dependent Youden index and log-rank test were used to obtain the best cut-offs of 18 preoperative biomarkers for OS and DFS. An adjusted Cox model with variables selected by bootstrapping was used to identify the best preoperative biomarkers, which were also analysed for every TNM stage. Results: High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), high monocyte systemic inflammation index (moSII), and low prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were identified as independent predictors of poor outcome: NLR > 5.91 (HR:1.73; 95%CI [1.23–2.43]), moSII >2027.12 (HR:2.26; 95%CI [1.36–3.78]), and PNI >40.31 (HR:0.75; 95%CI [0.58–0.96]) for 5-year OS and NLR > 6.81 (HR:1.75; 95%CI [1.24–2.45]), moSII > 2027.12 (HR:2.46; 95%CI [1.49–4.04]), and PNI > 40.31 (HR:0.77; 95%CI [0.60,0.97]) for 5-year DFS. These outcomes were maintained in the whole cohort for NLR and moSII (p < 0.05) but not in stage II and for PNI in all tumoral stages. The associations of NLR-PNI and moSII-PNI were also a relevant prognostic factor for OS. Conclusions: High NLR, high moSII (for stages I and III), and low PNI (regardless of tumour stage) were the most promising preoperative biomarkers to predict poor OS and DFS in gastric cancer patients treated with curative intent.


  • Open Access

    Effect of Perioperative Blood Transfusions and Infectious Complications on Inflammatory Activation and Long-Term Survival Following Gastric Cancer Resection

    by Noelia Puértolas, Javier Osorio, Carlos Jericó, Coro Miranda, Maite Santamaría, Eva Artigau, Gonzalo Galofré, Elisenda Garsot, Alexis Luna, Aurora Aldeano, et al.

    Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of perioperative blood transfusion and infectious complications on postoperative changes of inflammatory markers, as well as on disease-free survival (DFS) in patients undergoing curative gastric cancer resection. Methods: Multicenter cohort study in all patients undergoing gastric cancer resection with curative intent. Patients were classified into four groups based on their perioperative course: one, no blood transfusion and no infectious complication; two, blood transfusion; three, infectious complication; four, both transfusion and infectious complication. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was determined at diagnosis, immediately before surgery, and 10 days after surgery. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to analyze the relationship of perioperative group and dynamic changes of NLR with disease-free survival. Results: 282 patients were included, 181 in group one, 23 in group two, 55 in group three, and 23 in group four. Postoperative NLR changes showed progressive increase in the four groups. Univariate analysis showed that NLR change > 2.6 had a significant association with DFS (HR 1.55; 95% CI 1.06–2.26; p = 0.025), which was maintained in multivariate analysis (HR 1.67; 95% CI 1.14–2.46; p = 0.009). Perioperative classification was an independent predictor of DFS, with a progressive difference from group one: group two, HR 0.80 (95% CI: 0.40–1.61; p = 0.540); group three, HR 1.42 (95% CI: 0.88–2.30; p = 0.148), group four, HR 2.85 (95% CI: 1.64–4.95; p = 0.046). Conclusions: Combination of perioperative blood transfusion and infectious complications following gastric cancer surgery was related to greater NLR increase and poorer DFS. These findings suggest that perioperative blood transfusion and infectious complications may have a synergic effect creating a pro-inflammatory activation that favors tumor recurrence.


  • Cost analysis of a patient blood management program for patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery

    by Carlos Jericó, Noelia Puértolas, Javier Osorio, Coro Miranda, Maite Santamaría, Eva Artigau, Gonzalo Galofré, Elisenda Garsot, Alexis Luna, Aurora Aldeano, et al.


  • Textbook outcome and survival after gastric cancer resection with curative intent: A population-based analysis

    by Mariagiulia Dal Cero, Marta Román, Luis Grande, Concepción Yarnoz, Fernando Estremiana, Amaia Gantxegi, Clara Codony, Yanina Gobbini, Elisenda Garsot, Dulce Momblan, et al.