Enrico Regalia
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Enrico Regalia has a total of 296 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Vincenzo Mazzaferro
Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori Di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
27 shared publications Andrea Pulvirenti
From the *Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, †Imaging and Interventional Radiology, ‡Medical Statistic, Biometry and Clinical Trials, and §Pathology, National Cancer Institute (Istituto Nazionale Tumori), Milan, 20133 Italy
10 shared publicationsV Mazzaferro
10 shared publications- Jorgelina Coppa
Hepatology and Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, ENETS Center of Excellence, 20133 Milan, Italy
9 shared publications Leandro Gennari
Liver Transplantation Unit, National Cancer Institute, Milan
9 shared publications- Dario Baratti
Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
8 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 22 May 2020
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Transplantation
- Vol. 20 (7) , 1840-1848
The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on liver transplantation programs in Northern Italy
- 22 May 2020
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Transplantation
- Vol. 20 (7) , 1840-1848
Open AccessThe impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on liver transplantation programs in Northern Italy
- 1 August 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Hepatology
- Vol. 67 (2) , 415-417
Occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in HIV/HCV co-infected patients treated with direct-acting antivirals
- 1 August 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Hepatology
- Vol. 67 (2) , 415-417
Occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in HIV/HCV co-infected patients treated with direct-acting antivirals
- Open Access
- 6 October 2016
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Liver Transplantation
- Vol. 23 (2) , 184-193
Donor safety in living donor liver donation: An Italian multicenter survey
Major concerns about donor morbidity and mortality still limit the use of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to overcome the organ shortage. The present study assessed donor safety in LDLT in Italy reporting donor postoperative outcomes in 246 living donation procedures performed by 7 transplant centers. Outcomes were evaluated over 2 time periods using the validated Clavien 5‐tier grading system, and several clinical variables were analyzed to determine the risk factors for donor morbidity. Different grafts were obtained from the 246 donor procedures (220 right lobe, 10 left lobe, and 16 left lateral segments). The median follow‐up after donation was 112 months. There was no donor mortality. One or more complications occurred in 82 (33.3%) donors, and 3 of them had intraoperative complications (1.2%). Regardless of graft type, the rate of major complications (grade ≥ 3) was 12.6% (31/246). The overall donor morbidity and the rate of major complications did not differ significantly over time: 26 (10.6%) donors required hospital readmission throughout the follow‐up period, whereas 5 (2.0%) donors required reoperation. Prolonged operative time (>400 minutes), intraoperative hypotension (systolic < 100 mm Hg), vascular abnormalities, and intraoperative blood loss (>300 mL) were multivariate risk factors for postoperative donor complications. In conclusion, from the standpoint of living donor surgery, a meticulous and well‐standardized technique that reduces operative time and prevents blood loss and intraoperative hypotension may reduce the incidence of donor complications. Transparency in reporting results after LDLT is mandatory, and we should continue to strive for zero donor mortality. Liver Transplantation 23 184–193 2017 AASLD
- 6 October 2016
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Liver Transplantation
- Vol. 23 (2) , 184-193
Open AccessDonor safety in living donor liver donation: An Italian multicenter survey
Major concerns about donor morbidity and mortality still limit the use of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to overcome the organ shortage. The present study assessed donor safety in LDLT in Italy reporting donor postoperative outcomes in 246 living donation procedures performed by 7 transplant centers. Outcomes were evaluated over 2 time periods using the validated Clavien 5‐tier grading system, and several clinical variables were analyzed to determine the risk factors for donor morbidity. Different grafts were obtained from the 246 donor procedures (220 right lobe, 10 left lobe, and 16 left lateral segments). The median follow‐up after donation was 112 months. There was no donor mortality. One or more complications occurred in 82 (33.3%) donors, and 3 of them had intraoperative complications (1.2%). Regardless of graft type, the rate of major complications (grade ≥ 3) was 12.6% (31/246). The overall donor morbidity and the rate of major complications did not differ significantly over time: 26 (10.6%) donors required hospital readmission throughout the follow‐up period, whereas 5 (2.0%) donors required reoperation. Prolonged operative time (>400 minutes), intraoperative hypotension (systolic < 100 mm Hg), vascular abnormalities, and intraoperative blood loss (>300 mL) were multivariate risk factors for postoperative donor complications. In conclusion, from the standpoint of living donor surgery, a meticulous and well‐standardized technique that reduces operative time and prevents blood loss and intraoperative hypotension may reduce the incidence of donor complications. Transparency in reporting results after LDLT is mandatory, and we should continue to strive for zero donor mortality. Liver Transplantation 23 184–193 2017 AASLD
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 1 May 2016
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Transplantation
- Vol. 16 (10) , 2892-2902
The Long-Term Benefit of Liver Transplantation for Hepatic Metastases From Neuroendocrine Tumors
- 1 May 2016
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Transplantation
- Vol. 16 (10) , 2892-2902
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessThe Long-Term Benefit of Liver Transplantation for Hepatic Metastases From Neuroendocrine Tumors
- Open Access
- 5 October 2015
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Liver Transplantation
- Vol. 22 (2) , 252-253
Paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir for treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus infection in the human immunodeficiency virus coinfected liver transplant recipient
- 5 October 2015
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Liver Transplantation
- Vol. 22 (2) , 252-253
Open AccessParitaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir for treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus infection in the human immunodeficiency virus coinfected liver transplant recipient
- 1 February 2014
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Hepatology
- Vol. 60 (2) , 290-297
A method for establishing allocation equity among patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma on a common liver transplant waiting list
- 1 February 2014
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Hepatology
- Vol. 60 (2) , 290-297
A method for establishing allocation equity among patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma on a common liver transplant waiting list
- Open Access
- 1 April 2013
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Hepatology
- Vol. 58, S48
108 A NOVEL MODEL OF PRIORITY ASSESSMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA ON A COMMON LIVER TRANSPLANT WAITING LIST: A MULTICENTRE, COHORT STUDY
- 1 April 2013
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Hepatology
- Vol. 58, S48
Open Access108 A NOVEL MODEL OF PRIORITY ASSESSMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA ON A COMMON LIVER TRANSPLANT WAITING LIST: A MULTICENTRE, COHORT STUDY
- 26 November 2004
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Transplant International
- Vol. 17 (11) , 724-729
Outcome of pregnancy after organ transplantation: a retrospective survey in Italy
The number of women who decide to have a child after organ transplantation has increased. We determined the outcomes of 67 pregnancies of women who had undergone kidney, liver or heart transplantation. All recipients had been maintained on immunosuppressive therapy before and during pregnancy. Pregnancy complications at term were observed in 17 out of 67 women (25%), hypertension being the most frequent complication (16.17%). Two transplant rejections were reported. Sixty-eight infants were delivered (including one pair of twins); five women had two pregnancies at term. Twenty-eight miscarriages (29.2%) were recorded. Of these 68 babies (including the pair of twins), 40 (58.8%) were born at term and 28 (41.2%) before term. The babies were followed-up for 2 months to 13 years. According to our previous experience, our study shows that patients who have undergone organ transplantation can give birth to healthy infants as long as they are monitored accurately during pregnancy.
- 26 November 2004
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Transplant International
- Vol. 17 (11) , 724-729
Outcome of pregnancy after organ transplantation: a retrospective survey in Italy
The number of women who decide to have a child after organ transplantation has increased. We determined the outcomes of 67 pregnancies of women who had undergone kidney, liver or heart transplantation. All recipients had been maintained on immunosuppressive therapy before and during pregnancy. Pregnancy complications at term were observed in 17 out of 67 women (25%), hypertension being the most frequent complication (16.17%). Two transplant rejections were reported. Sixty-eight infants were delivered (including one pair of twins); five women had two pregnancies at term. Twenty-eight miscarriages (29.2%) were recorded. Of these 68 babies (including the pair of twins), 40 (58.8%) were born at term and 28 (41.2%) before term. The babies were followed-up for 2 months to 13 years. According to our previous experience, our study shows that patients who have undergone organ transplantation can give birth to healthy infants as long as they are monitored accurately during pregnancy.
- 1 November 2004
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 240 (5) , 900-909
Radiofrequency Ablation of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients Awaiting Liver Transplantation
Objective: Determine the histologic response-rate (complete versus partial tumor extinction) after single radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) arising in cirrhosis. Investigate possible predictors of response and assess efficacy and safety of RFA as a bridge to liver transplantation (OLT). Background: RFA has become the elective treatment of local control of HCC, although histologic data supporting radiologic assessment of response are rare and prospective studies are lacking. Prognostic impact of repeated RFA for HCC persistence is also undetermined. Methods: Percentage of RFA-induced necrosis and tumor persistence-rate at various intervals from treatment was studied in 60 HCC (median: 3 cm; Milan-Criteria IN: 80%) isolated in 50 consecutive cirrhotic patients undergoing OLT. Single-session RFA was the only treatment planned before OLT. Histologic response determined on explanted livers was related to 28 variables and to pre-OLT CT scan. Results: Mean interval RFA→OLT was 9.5 months. Post-RFA complete response rate was 55%, rising to 63% for HCC ≤3 cm. Tumor size was the only prognostic factor significantly related to response (P = 0.007). Tumor satellites and/or new HCC foci (56 nodules) were unaffected by RFA and significantly correlated with HCC >3 cm (P = 0.05). Post-RFA tumor persistence probability increased with time (12 months: 59%; 18 months: 70%). Radiologic response rate was 70%, not significantly different from histology. Major post-RFA morbidity was 8%. No mortality, Child deterioration, patient withdrawal because of tumor progression was observed. Post-OLT 3-year patient/graft survival was 83%. Conclusions: RFA is a safe and effective treatment of small HCC in cirrhotics awaiting OLT, although tumor size (>3 cm) and time from treatment (>1 year) predict a high risk of tumor persistence in the targeted nodule. RFA should not be considered an independent therapy for HCC.
- 1 November 2004
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 240 (5) , 900-909
Radiofrequency Ablation of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients Awaiting Liver Transplantation
Objective: Determine the histologic response-rate (complete versus partial tumor extinction) after single radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) arising in cirrhosis. Investigate possible predictors of response and assess efficacy and safety of RFA as a bridge to liver transplantation (OLT). Background: RFA has become the elective treatment of local control of HCC, although histologic data supporting radiologic assessment of response are rare and prospective studies are lacking. Prognostic impact of repeated RFA for HCC persistence is also undetermined. Methods: Percentage of RFA-induced necrosis and tumor persistence-rate at various intervals from treatment was studied in 60 HCC (median: 3 cm; Milan-Criteria IN: 80%) isolated in 50 consecutive cirrhotic patients undergoing OLT. Single-session RFA was the only treatment planned before OLT. Histologic response determined on explanted livers was related to 28 variables and to pre-OLT CT scan. Results: Mean interval RFA→OLT was 9.5 months. Post-RFA complete response rate was 55%, rising to 63% for HCC ≤3 cm. Tumor size was the only prognostic factor significantly related to response (P = 0.007). Tumor satellites and/or new HCC foci (56 nodules) were unaffected by RFA and significantly correlated with HCC >3 cm (P = 0.05). Post-RFA tumor persistence probability increased with time (12 months: 59%; 18 months: 70%). Radiologic response rate was 70%, not significantly different from histology. Major post-RFA morbidity was 8%. No mortality, Child deterioration, patient withdrawal because of tumor progression was observed. Post-OLT 3-year patient/graft survival was 83%. Conclusions: RFA is a safe and effective treatment of small HCC in cirrhotics awaiting OLT, although tumor size (>3 cm) and time from treatment (>1 year) predict a high risk of tumor persistence in the targeted nodule. RFA should not be considered an independent therapy for HCC.