Aimin Zhao
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Aimin Zhao has a total of 143 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Jun Xiao
Collaborative Innovation Center of Steel Technology, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China
12 shared publications- Kuo Cao
Collaborative Innovation Center of Steel Technology, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
8 shared publications Di Wang
7 shared publicationsShaoguang Yang
7 shared publicationsHui Guo
6 shared publications- Jun Xiao
Collaborative Innovation Center of Steel Technology, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
5 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 30 September 2026
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials
- p. 1-13
Effect of Y on solidification microstructure and corrosion resistance of high Mo super austenitic stainless steels
Purpose: This study investigates the effect of Y on the microstructure and corrosion resistance of high Mo super austenitic stainless steels. This study aims to provide experimental evidence for the development and application of high-Mo super austenitic stainless steel. Design/methodology/approach: High Mo super austenitic stainless steels (SASSs) containing 0, 24, 50 and 93 ppm Y were prepared by vacuum nonconsumable arc melting. Thermodynamic calculations based on the Gulliver-Scheil models, combined with optical microscope, scanning electron microscope, equipped with energy-dispersive spectroscopy, electron backscatter diffraction, X-ray diffractometer, transmission electron microscopy, potentiodynamic polarization, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and laser scanning confocal microscopy were used to systematically study the effect of Y on the solidification behavior, microstructure, σ phase precipitation and corrosion resistance of high Mo SASSs. Findings: The addition of Y slightly decreased the s phase precipitation temperature and reduced the enrichment of Cr and Mo in the interdendritic residual liquid. Y significantly refined the solidification microstructure and reduced elemental segregation. The σ phase volume fraction, size and continuity decreased significantly with the increase of Y content. In a 3.5 Wt.% NaCl solution, the addition of an appropriate amount of Y reduced the corrosion current density, increased the polarization resistance and reduced pit depth. The test steel with a Y content of 50 ppm showed the best corrosion resistance. Originality/value: This study provides insights into the effect and optimum addition content of Y in high Mo super austenitic stainless steels.
- 30 September 2026
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials
- p. 1-13
Effect of Y on solidification microstructure and corrosion resistance of high Mo super austenitic stainless steels
Purpose: This study investigates the effect of Y on the microstructure and corrosion resistance of high Mo super austenitic stainless steels. This study aims to provide experimental evidence for the development and application of high-Mo super austenitic stainless steel. Design/methodology/approach: High Mo super austenitic stainless steels (SASSs) containing 0, 24, 50 and 93 ppm Y were prepared by vacuum nonconsumable arc melting. Thermodynamic calculations based on the Gulliver-Scheil models, combined with optical microscope, scanning electron microscope, equipped with energy-dispersive spectroscopy, electron backscatter diffraction, X-ray diffractometer, transmission electron microscopy, potentiodynamic polarization, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and laser scanning confocal microscopy were used to systematically study the effect of Y on the solidification behavior, microstructure, σ phase precipitation and corrosion resistance of high Mo SASSs. Findings: The addition of Y slightly decreased the s phase precipitation temperature and reduced the enrichment of Cr and Mo in the interdendritic residual liquid. Y significantly refined the solidification microstructure and reduced elemental segregation. The σ phase volume fraction, size and continuity decreased significantly with the increase of Y content. In a 3.5 Wt.% NaCl solution, the addition of an appropriate amount of Y reduced the corrosion current density, increased the polarization resistance and reduced pit depth. The test steel with a Y content of 50 ppm showed the best corrosion resistance. Originality/value: This study provides insights into the effect and optimum addition content of Y in high Mo super austenitic stainless steels.
- 25 September 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Materials Science
- Vol. 61 (43) , 34256-34272
Microstructural evolution and dynamic recrystallization mechanism of 347H heat-resistant steel
- 25 September 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Materials Science
- Vol. 61 (43) , 34256-34272
Microstructural evolution and dynamic recrystallization mechanism of 347H heat-resistant steel
- Open Access
- 3 December 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Materials Research and Technology
- Vol. 39, 9681-9691
Effect of coupled intercritical isothermal holding and rapid heating on bainitic transformation and mechanical properties in medium-carbon nanobainitic steel
- 3 December 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Materials Research and Technology
- Vol. 39, 9681-9691
Open AccessEffect of coupled intercritical isothermal holding and rapid heating on bainitic transformation and mechanical properties in medium-carbon nanobainitic steel
- Open Access
Study on Cold Cracking in 430Cb Ferritic Stainless Steel Castings Based on Multiscale Characterization and Simulation Analysis
Cracks were found at the gate of the 430Cb ferritic stainless steel exhaust system jet base produced by investment casting. In this paper, the cracks of failed stainless steel castings were comprehensively analyzed by means of macroscopic inspection, laser confocal microscopy, field emission scanning electron microscopy, electron backscatter diffraction, X-ray diffractometer, ProCAST (version 2018, ESI Group, Paris, France) simulation and Thermo-Calc (TCFE10 database, 2022a, Thermo-Calc Software AB, Solna, Sweden) thermodynamic calculation. It can be concluded that all the cracks originate from the gate on the surface of the casting, and the fracture surface shows brittle intergranular characteristics, which can be determined as cold cracks. The formation of cold cracks can be attributed to the fact that the local stress generated during cooling after the casting solidifies exceeds the strength limit of the material itself. As the gate is the final solidification zone, shrinkage is limited and stress is concentrated. The grains are coarse, and the microstructure defects such as shrinkage porosity, pores and needle-like NbC further weaken the plasticity of the grain boundaries, promoting the crack to propagate along the direction of the maximum principal stress. The uneven cooling rate and shell constraint during the investment casting process make it difficult to release stress, and the existence of microstructure defects are the fundamental causes of crack generation.
Open AccessStudy on Cold Cracking in 430Cb Ferritic Stainless Steel Castings Based on Multiscale Characterization and Simulation Analysis
Cracks were found at the gate of the 430Cb ferritic stainless steel exhaust system jet base produced by investment casting. In this paper, the cracks of failed stainless steel castings were comprehensively analyzed by means of macroscopic inspection, laser confocal microscopy, field emission scanning electron microscopy, electron backscatter diffraction, X-ray diffractometer, ProCAST (version 2018, ESI Group, Paris, France) simulation and Thermo-Calc (TCFE10 database, 2022a, Thermo-Calc Software AB, Solna, Sweden) thermodynamic calculation. It can be concluded that all the cracks originate from the gate on the surface of the casting, and the fracture surface shows brittle intergranular characteristics, which can be determined as cold cracks. The formation of cold cracks can be attributed to the fact that the local stress generated during cooling after the casting solidifies exceeds the strength limit of the material itself. As the gate is the final solidification zone, shrinkage is limited and stress is concentrated. The grains are coarse, and the microstructure defects such as shrinkage porosity, pores and needle-like NbC further weaken the plasticity of the grain boundaries, promoting the crack to propagate along the direction of the maximum principal stress. The uneven cooling rate and shell constraint during the investment casting process make it difficult to release stress, and the existence of microstructure defects are the fundamental causes of crack generation.
- Open Access
Solidification Microstructure and Secondary-Phase Precipitation Behavior of 310S Austenitic Stainless Steel
In this study, the solidification behavior of 310S stainless steel was systematically investigated by combining high-temperature confocal laser scanning microscopy (HT-CLSM), microstructural characterization, and thermodynamic calculations. The focus was on the formation and transformation of ferrite, secondary-phase precipitation, and elemental segregation behavior, with comparisons made with 304 stainless steel. The effects of an Al addition and cooling rate were also explored. The results show that the solidification sequence of 310S stainless steel is L → L + γ → L + γ + δ → δ + γ, in which austenite nucleates early and grows rapidly, followed by the precipitation of a small amount of δ-ferrite in the later stages of solidification. In contrast, 304 stainless steel solidifies according to L → L + δ → L + δ + γ → δ + γ, with a rapid δ → γ transformation occurring after solidification. Compared with 304, 310S stainless steel exhibits a reduced ferrite fraction and a significantly increased σ phase content. The σ phase primarily precipitates directly from δ-ferrite (δ → σ), while M23C6 preferentially forms at grain boundaries and δ/γ interfaces, where δ-ferrite not only provides fast diffusion pathways for Cr but also nucleation sites. The solidification segregation sequence in 310S stainless steel is Cr > Ni > Fe, with Cr and Ni showing positive segregation and Fe showing negative segregation. The addition of Al does not alter the solidification mode of 310S stainless steel but refines austenite grains, reduces interdendritic solute enrichment, decreases segregation, lowers both the size and fraction of ferrite, and suppresses the precipitation of σ and M23C6 phases. This effect is mainly attributed to the reduction of δ/γ interfaces, which weakens the preferred nucleation sites for M23C6. Increasing the cooling rate enhances non-equilibrium solute segregation, promotes ferrite formation, inhibits the δ → γ transformation, and ultimately retains more ferrite; the intensified segregation further accelerates the δ → σ transformation.
Open AccessSolidification Microstructure and Secondary-Phase Precipitation Behavior of 310S Austenitic Stainless Steel
In this study, the solidification behavior of 310S stainless steel was systematically investigated by combining high-temperature confocal laser scanning microscopy (HT-CLSM), microstructural characterization, and thermodynamic calculations. The focus was on the formation and transformation of ferrite, secondary-phase precipitation, and elemental segregation behavior, with comparisons made with 304 stainless steel. The effects of an Al addition and cooling rate were also explored. The results show that the solidification sequence of 310S stainless steel is L → L + γ → L + γ + δ → δ + γ, in which austenite nucleates early and grows rapidly, followed by the precipitation of a small amount of δ-ferrite in the later stages of solidification. In contrast, 304 stainless steel solidifies according to L → L + δ → L + δ + γ → δ + γ, with a rapid δ → γ transformation occurring after solidification. Compared with 304, 310S stainless steel exhibits a reduced ferrite fraction and a significantly increased σ phase content. The σ phase primarily precipitates directly from δ-ferrite (δ → σ), while M23C6 preferentially forms at grain boundaries and δ/γ interfaces, where δ-ferrite not only provides fast diffusion pathways for Cr but also nucleation sites. The solidification segregation sequence in 310S stainless steel is Cr > Ni > Fe, with Cr and Ni showing positive segregation and Fe showing negative segregation. The addition of Al does not alter the solidification mode of 310S stainless steel but refines austenite grains, reduces interdendritic solute enrichment, decreases segregation, lowers both the size and fraction of ferrite, and suppresses the precipitation of σ and M23C6 phases. This effect is mainly attributed to the reduction of δ/γ interfaces, which weakens the preferred nucleation sites for M23C6. Increasing the cooling rate enhances non-equilibrium solute segregation, promotes ferrite formation, inhibits the δ → γ transformation, and ultimately retains more ferrite; the intensified segregation further accelerates the δ → σ transformation.
- Open Access
- 5 September 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Materials Research and Technology
- Vol. 38, 5579-5593
Effects of niobium and yttrium additions on carbide characteristics, microstructural evolution, and performance enhancement in D2 cold work die steel
- 5 September 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Materials Research and Technology
- Vol. 38, 5579-5593
Open AccessEffects of niobium and yttrium additions on carbide characteristics, microstructural evolution, and performance enhancement in D2 cold work die steel
- 20 July 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Materials Letters
- Vol. 400
Enhancing the yield strength of bainitic steel via cold rolling–rapid heating-induced crystallographic packet reorganization
- 20 July 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Materials Letters
- Vol. 400
Enhancing the yield strength of bainitic steel via cold rolling–rapid heating-induced crystallographic packet reorganization
- Open Access
- 19 July 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Materials Research and Technology
- Vol. 37, 5226-5236
Effects of quenching and tempering temperatures on variant selection and abrasive wear behavior of low alloy martensitic steel
- 19 July 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Materials Research and Technology
- Vol. 37, 5226-5236
Open AccessEffects of quenching and tempering temperatures on variant selection and abrasive wear behavior of low alloy martensitic steel
- Open Access
The Effect of Yttrium Addition on the Solidification Microstructure and Sigma Phase Precipitation Behavior of S32654 Super Austenitic Stainless Steel
This study focuses on S32654 super austenitic stainless steel (SASS) and systematically characterizes the morphology of the sigma (σ) phase and the segregation behavior of alloying elements in its as-cast microstructure. High-temperature confocal scanning laser microscopy (HT-CSLM) was employed to investigate the effect of the rare earth element yttrium (Y) on the solidification microstructure and σ phase precipitation behavior of SASS. The results show that the microstructure of SASS consists of austenite dendrites and interdendritic eutectoid structures. The eutectoid structures mainly comprise the σ phase and the γ2 phase, exhibiting lamellar or honeycomb-like morphologies. Regarding elemental distribution, molybdenum displays a “concave” distribution pattern within the dendrites, with lower concentrations at the center and higher concentrations at the sides; when Mo locally exceeds beyond a certain threshold, it easily induces the formation of eutectoid structures. Mo is the most significant segregating element, with a segregation ratio as high as 1.69. The formation mechanism of the σ phase is attributed to the solid-state phase transformation of austenite (γ → γ2 + σ). In the late stages of solidification, the concentration of chromium and Mo in the residual liquid phase increases, and due to insufficient diffusion, there are significant compositional differences between the interdendritic regions and the matrix. The enriched Cr and Mo cause the interdendritic austenite to become supersaturated, leading to solid-state phase transformation during subsequent cooling, thereby promoting σ phase precipitation. The overall phase transformation process can be summarized as L → L + γ → γ → γ + γ2 + σ. Y microalloying has a significant influence on the solidification process. The addition of Y increases the nucleation temperature of austenite, raises nucleation density, and refines the solidification microstructure. However, Y addition also leads to an increased amount of eutectoid structures. This is primarily because Y broadens the solidification temperature range of the alloy and prolongs grain growth perio, which aggravates the microsegregation of elements such as Cr and Mo. Moreover, Y raises the initial precipitation temperature of the σ phase and enhances atomic diffusion during solidification, further promoting σ phase precipitation during the subsequent eutectoid transformation.
Open AccessThe Effect of Yttrium Addition on the Solidification Microstructure and Sigma Phase Precipitation Behavior of S32654 Super Austenitic Stainless Steel
This study focuses on S32654 super austenitic stainless steel (SASS) and systematically characterizes the morphology of the sigma (σ) phase and the segregation behavior of alloying elements in its as-cast microstructure. High-temperature confocal scanning laser microscopy (HT-CSLM) was employed to investigate the effect of the rare earth element yttrium (Y) on the solidification microstructure and σ phase precipitation behavior of SASS. The results show that the microstructure of SASS consists of austenite dendrites and interdendritic eutectoid structures. The eutectoid structures mainly comprise the σ phase and the γ2 phase, exhibiting lamellar or honeycomb-like morphologies. Regarding elemental distribution, molybdenum displays a “concave” distribution pattern within the dendrites, with lower concentrations at the center and higher concentrations at the sides; when Mo locally exceeds beyond a certain threshold, it easily induces the formation of eutectoid structures. Mo is the most significant segregating element, with a segregation ratio as high as 1.69. The formation mechanism of the σ phase is attributed to the solid-state phase transformation of austenite (γ → γ2 + σ). In the late stages of solidification, the concentration of chromium and Mo in the residual liquid phase increases, and due to insufficient diffusion, there are significant compositional differences between the interdendritic regions and the matrix. The enriched Cr and Mo cause the interdendritic austenite to become supersaturated, leading to solid-state phase transformation during subsequent cooling, thereby promoting σ phase precipitation. The overall phase transformation process can be summarized as L → L + γ → γ → γ + γ2 + σ. Y microalloying has a significant influence on the solidification process. The addition of Y increases the nucleation temperature of austenite, raises nucleation density, and refines the solidification microstructure. However, Y addition also leads to an increased amount of eutectoid structures. This is primarily because Y broadens the solidification temperature range of the alloy and prolongs grain growth perio, which aggravates the microsegregation of elements such as Cr and Mo. Moreover, Y raises the initial precipitation temperature of the σ phase and enhances atomic diffusion during solidification, further promoting σ phase precipitation during the subsequent eutectoid transformation.
- Open Access
Research on the Solidification Structure of the Zn-19Al-6Mg Alloy
This paper deals with “Zn-19Al-6Mg” coatings and their solidification structure is the basis for the study of the alloy’s properties. The solidification equilibrium phase diagram of this alloy was calculated using thermodynamic software. Samples were taken from the billets of this alloy for differential thermal analysis experiments. By combining the phase diagram and the experimental results of differential thermal analysis, the solidification structure of the Zn-19Al-6Mg alloy was obtained. The phases in the solidified structure were identified by means of SEM, EDS, XRD, etc. The research finds that the solidification structure of the Zn-19Al-6Mg alloy is composed of the β-Al phase, the α-Al phase, the MgZn2 phase, and the Mg2Zn11 phase. During the actual solidification process of the alloy, due to the large cooling rate, Zn-rich phases will appear in the microstructure. The research results provide a basis for the regulation of the coating structure when preparing Zn-19Al-6Mg-coated sheets and strips.
Open AccessResearch on the Solidification Structure of the Zn-19Al-6Mg Alloy
This paper deals with “Zn-19Al-6Mg” coatings and their solidification structure is the basis for the study of the alloy’s properties. The solidification equilibrium phase diagram of this alloy was calculated using thermodynamic software. Samples were taken from the billets of this alloy for differential thermal analysis experiments. By combining the phase diagram and the experimental results of differential thermal analysis, the solidification structure of the Zn-19Al-6Mg alloy was obtained. The phases in the solidified structure were identified by means of SEM, EDS, XRD, etc. The research finds that the solidification structure of the Zn-19Al-6Mg alloy is composed of the β-Al phase, the α-Al phase, the MgZn2 phase, and the Mg2Zn11 phase. During the actual solidification process of the alloy, due to the large cooling rate, Zn-rich phases will appear in the microstructure. The research results provide a basis for the regulation of the coating structure when preparing Zn-19Al-6Mg-coated sheets and strips.