Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


MacDonald J. Christie has a total of 519 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Top Cited Papers

    Positive allosteric mechanisms of adenosine A1 receptor-mediated analgesia

    by Christopher J. Draper-Joyce, Rebecca Bhola, Jinan Wang, Apurba Bhattarai, Anh T. N. Nguyen, India Cowie-Kent, Kelly O’sullivan, Ling Yeong Chia, Hariprasad Venugopal, Celine Valant, et al.

    The adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) is a promising therapeutic target for non-opioid analgesic agents to treat neuropathic pain1,2. However, development of analgesic orthosteric A1R agonists has failed because of a lack of sufficient on-target selectivity as well as off-tissue adverse effects3. Here we show that [2-amino-4-(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)thiophen-3-yl)(4-chlorophenyl)methanone] (MIPS521), a positive allosteric modulator of the A1R, exhibits analgesic efficacy in rats in vivo through modulation of the increased levels of endogenous adenosine that occur in the spinal cord of rats with neuropathic pain. We also report the structure of the A1R co-bound to adenosine, MIPS521 and a Gi2 heterotrimer, revealing an extrahelical lipid–detergent-facing allosteric binding pocket that involves transmembrane helixes 1, 6 and 7. Molecular dynamics simulations and ligand kinetic binding experiments support a mechanism whereby MIPS521 stabilizes the adenosine–receptor–G protein complex. This study provides proof of concept for structure-based allosteric drug design of non-opioid analgesic agents that are specific to disease contexts.


  • Open Access

    Opioid receptors in GtoPdb v.2021.3

    by Anna Borsodi, Michael Bruchas, Girolamo Caló, Charles Chavkin, MacDonald J. Christie, Olivier Civelli, Mark Connor, Brian M. Cox, Lakshmi A. Devi, Christopher Evans, et al.

    Opioid and opioid-like receptors are activated by a variety of endogenous peptides including [Met]enkephalin (met), [Leu]enkephalin (leu), β-endorphin (β-end), α-neodynorphin, dynorphin A (dynA), dynorphin B (dynB), big dynorphin (Big dyn), nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ); endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 are also potential endogenous peptides. The Greek letter nomenclature for the opioid receptors, μ, δ and κ, is well established, and NC-IUPHAR considers this nomenclature appropriate, along with the symbols spelled out (mu, delta, and kappa), and the acronyms, MOP, DOP, and KOP. [121, 100, 91]. The human N/OFQ receptor, NOP, is considered 'opioid-related' rather than opioid because, while it exhibits a high degree of structural homology with the conventional opioid receptors [294], it displays a distinct pharmacology. Currently there are numerous clinically used drugs, such as morphine and many other opioid analgesics, as well as antagonists such as naloxone, however only for the μ receptor.


  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    Critical Assessment of G Protein-Biased Agonism at the μ-Opioid Receptor

    by Alexander Gillis, Andrea Kliewer, Eamonn Kelly, Graeme Henderson, Macdonald J. Christie, Stefan Schulz, Meritxell Canals


  • Intrinsic Efficacy of Opioid Ligands and Its Importance for Apparent Bias, Operational Analysis, and Therapeutic Window

    by Alexander Gillis, Varun Sreenivasan, Macdonald J. Christie

    Evidence from several novel opioid agonists and knockout animals suggest that improved opioid therapeutic window, notably for analgesia versus respiratory depression, can be caused by ligand bias downstream of activation of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) towards G-protein signaling and away from other pathways such as arrestin recruitment. Here, we argue that published claims of opioid bias based on application of the operational model of agonism are frequently confounded by failure to consider the assumptions of the model. These include failure to account for intrinsic efficacy and ceiling effects in different pathways, distortions introduced by analysis of amplified (G-protein) versus linear (arrestin) signaling mechanisms, and non-equilibrium effects in a dynamic signaling cascade. We show on both theoretical and experimental grounds that reduced intrinsic efficacy that is unbiased across different downstream pathways does produce apparent but erroneous MOR ligand bias towards G-protein signaling, and the weaker the G-protein partial agonism the greater is the apparent bias. Experimentally, such apparently G-protein biased opioids have been shown to exhibit low intrinsic efficacy for G-protein signaling when ceiling effects are properly accounted for. Nevertheless, such agonists do display an improved therapeutic window for analgesia versus respiratory depression. Reduced intrinsic efficacy for G-proteins rather than any supposed G-protein bias provides a more plausible, sufficient explanation for the improved safety. Moreover, genetic models of G-protein biased opioid receptors and replication of previous knockout experiments suggest that reduced or abolished arrestin recruitment does not improve therapeutic window for analgesia versus respiratory depression. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Efforts to improve safety of mu-opioid analgesics has focused on agonists that show signaling bias for the G-protein pathway versus other signaling pathways. This review provides theoretical and experimental evidence showing that failure to properly consider the assumptions of the operational model of bias commonly leads to large distortions and overestimation of actual bias. We show that low intrinsic efficacy is a major determinant of these distortions and pursuit of appropriately reduced intrinsic efficacy should lead development of safer opioids.


  • Top Cited Papers

    Low intrinsic efficacy for G protein activation can explain the improved side effect profiles of new opioid agonists

    by Alexander Gillis, Arisbel B. Gondin, Andrea Kliewer, Julie Sanchez, Herman D. Lim, Claudia Alamein, Preeti Manandhar, Marina Santiago, Sebastian Fritzwanker, Frank Schmiedel, et al.

    Low intrinsic efficacy can explain the reduced side effects of apparently biased μ-opioid receptor agonists.


  • Top Cited Papers
    Open Access

    Morphine‐induced respiratory depression is independent of β‐arrestin2 signalling

    by Andrea Kliewer, Alexander Gillis, Rob Hill, Frank Schmiedel, Chris Bailey, Eamonn Kelly, Graeme Henderson, Macdonald J. Christie, Stefan Schulz

    Background and Purpose: GPCRs can signal through both G proteins and β‐arrestin2. For the μ‐opioid receptor, early experimental evidence from a single study suggested that G protein signalling mediates analgesia, whereas β‐arrestin2 signalling mediates respiratory depression and constipation. Consequently, for more than a decade, much research effort has been focused on developing biased μ‐opioid agonists that preferentially target G protein signalling over β‐arrestin signalling, as it was believed that such drugs would be analgesics devoid of respiratory depressant activity. However, the prototypical compounds that have been developed based on this concept have so far failed in clinical and preclinical development.Experimental Approach: The present study was set up to re‐examine opioid‐induced respiratory depression in β‐arrestin2 knockout mice. To this end, a consortium was formed consisting of three different laboratories located in different countries to evaluate independently opioid‐induced respiratory depression.Key Results: Our consensus results unequivocally demonstrate that the prototypical μ‐opioid agonist morphine (3.75–100 mg·kg−1 s.c. or 3–30 mg·kg−1 i.p.) as well as the potent opioid fentanyl (0.05–0.35 mg·kg−1 s.c.) do indeed induce respiratory depression and constipation in β‐arrestin2 knockout mice in a dose‐dependent manner indistinguishable from that observed in wild‐type mice.Conclusion and Implications: Our findings do not support the original suggestion that β‐arrestin2 signalling plays a key role in opioid‐induced respiratory depression and call into question the concept of developing G protein‐biased μ‐opioid receptor agonists as a strategy for the development of safer opioid analgesic drugs.


  • Open Access

    A tetrapeptide class of biased analgesics from an Australian fungus targets the µ-opioid receptor

    by Zoltan Dekan, Setareh Sianati, Arsalan Yousuf, Katy J. Sutcliffe, Alexander Gillis, Christophe Mallet, Paramjit Singh, Aihua H. Jin, Anna M. Wang, Sarasa A. Mohammadi, et al.

    Significance: Agonists of the μ-opioid receptor (MOPr) are currently the gold standard for pain treatment. However, their therapeutic usage is greatly limited by side effects including respiratory depression, constipation, tolerance, and dependence. Functionally selective MOPr agonists that mediate their effects preferentially through G proteins rather than β-arrestin signaling are believed to produce fewer side effects. Here, we present the discovery of 3 unusual tetrapeptides with a unique stereochemical arrangement of hydrophobic amino acids from an Australian estuarine isolate of Penicillium species. Building on these natural templates we developed bilorphin, a potent and selective highly G protein-biased agonist of the MOPr. Further, through the addition of a simple sugar moiety, we generated bilactorphin that is an effective analgesic in vivo.


  • Correction to: Electrophysiological Actions of N/OFQ

    by Bryony L. Winters, Macdonald J. Christie, Christopher W. Vaughan

    In the last paragraph of Sect. 2.1.2 on line 3 the word ‘off-cells’ is misspelt. It should be ‘on-cells’.

  • Development of an N-Acyl Amino Acid That Selectively Inhibits the Glycine Transporter 2 To Produce Analgesia in a Rat Model of Chronic Pain

    by Shannon N. Mostyn, Tristan Rawling, Sarasa Mohammadi, Susan Shimmon, Zachary J. Frangos, Subhodeep Sarker, Arsalan Yousuf, Irina Vetter, Renae M. Ryan, Macdonald J. Christie, et al.

    Inhibitors that target the glycine transporter 2, GlyT2, show promise as analgesics, but may be limited by their toxicity through complete or irreversible binding. Acyl-glycine inhibitors, however, are selective for GlyT2 and have been shown to provide analgesia in animal models of pain with minimal side effects, but are comparatively weak GlyT2 inhibitors. Here, we modify the simple acyl-glycine by synthesizing lipid analogues with a range of amino acid head groups in both l- and d-configurations, to produce nanomolar affinity, selective GlyT2 inhibitors. The potent inhibitor oleoyl-d-lysine (33) is also resistant to degradation in both human and rat plasma and liver microsomes, and is rapidly absorbed following an intraperitoneal injection to rats and readily crosses the blood–brain barrier. We demonstrate that 33 provides greater analgesia at lower doses, and does not possess the severe side effects of the very slowly reversible GlyT2 inhibitor, ORG25543 (2).