Laurent Maillet
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Laurent Maillet has a total of 170 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Philippe Paul Juin
Université de Nantes, INSERM, CNRS, CRCI2NA, Nantes, France
7 shared publications - Christophe Cullin
CBMN
6 shared publications Fabien Gautier
INSERM, CNRS, CRCI2NA, U1307, UMR6075, Nantes Université, Nantes, France
5 shared publications- Sophie Barillé-Nion
CRCI2NA, Nantes Université, INSERM, CNRS, Université d’Angers, Nantes, France
5 shared publications Aurélie Fétiveau
INSERM, CNRS, CRCI2NA, U1307, UMR6075, Nantes Université, Nantes, France
4 shared publicationsCéline Vuillier
CRCINA, INSERM, Université d'Angers, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
4 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 4 June 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Trends in Genetics
- Vol. 42 (8) , 701-721
Emerging role of G-quadruplexes in alternative splicing regulation
- 4 June 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Trends in Genetics
- Vol. 42 (8) , 701-721
Emerging role of G-quadruplexes in alternative splicing regulation
- Open Access
- 22 November 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 16 (1)
Allosteric regulation of BH3-in-groove interactions by tail anchors of BCL-xL complexes limits BH3 mimetic antagonism
BCL-xL promotes cell survival by binding BH3-only initiators through its hydrophobic groove. Combining resonance energy transfer assays and molecular dynamics simulations, we unravel that membrane anchoring of BCL-xL via its tail anchor selectively advantages binding to membrane-anchored PUMA initiator over BH3 mimetic ligands of the groove. This is due to the combined allosteric effect on BH3-in-groove binding of BCL-xL and PUMA tail anchors. Moreover, doubly anchored PUMA / BCL-xL complexes recruit endogenous BAX, which favors their antagonism by BH3 mimetics. BAX’s tail anchor alone is sufficient to enhance BH3 mimetics-induced death in cells expressing PUMA / BCL-xL. Our work supports a model in which the survival function of BCL-xL is regulated by a complex interplay between its tail anchor and those of its interacting partners. This enables both resistance to pharmacological inhibitors and modulation by BAX, which functions as a crucial feedback disruptor of the BCL-xL network.
- 22 November 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 16 (1)
Open AccessAllosteric regulation of BH3-in-groove interactions by tail anchors of BCL-xL complexes limits BH3 mimetic antagonism
BCL-xL promotes cell survival by binding BH3-only initiators through its hydrophobic groove. Combining resonance energy transfer assays and molecular dynamics simulations, we unravel that membrane anchoring of BCL-xL via its tail anchor selectively advantages binding to membrane-anchored PUMA initiator over BH3 mimetic ligands of the groove. This is due to the combined allosteric effect on BH3-in-groove binding of BCL-xL and PUMA tail anchors. Moreover, doubly anchored PUMA / BCL-xL complexes recruit endogenous BAX, which favors their antagonism by BH3 mimetics. BAX’s tail anchor alone is sufficient to enhance BH3 mimetics-induced death in cells expressing PUMA / BCL-xL. Our work supports a model in which the survival function of BCL-xL is regulated by a complex interplay between its tail anchor and those of its interacting partners. This enables both resistance to pharmacological inhibitors and modulation by BAX, which functions as a crucial feedback disruptor of the BCL-xL network.
- Open Access
Allosteric regulation of BH3-in-groove interactions by tail anchors of BCL-xL complexes limits BH3 mimetic antagonism.
BCL-xL exerts an essential cell survival function which relies on its hydrophobic groove binding to BH3 domain of BH3-only initiators and downstream BAX and BAK executioners. Combining resonance energy transfer assays and molecular dynamics simulations, we unravel that the C-terminal tail mediated subcellular membrane anchoring of BCL-xL selectively advantages binding to membrane-anchored PUMA initiator over BH3 mimetic ligands of the groove. This is due to the combined allosteric effect on BH3-in-groove binding of BCL-xL and PUMA tail anchors. Moreover, doubly anchored PUMA / BCL-xL complexes recruit endogenous BAX, which favors their antagonism by BH3 mimetics. BAX C-terminal tail anchor alone is sufficient to enhance BH3 mimetics induced death in cells expressing PUMA / BCL-xL. Thus, the survival function of BCL-xL is regulated by a complex interplay between its tail anchor and those of its interacting partners. This enables both resistance to pharmacological inhibitors and modulation by BAX, which functions as a crucial feedback disruptor of the BCL-xL network.
Open AccessAllosteric regulation of BH3-in-groove interactions by tail anchors of BCL-xL complexes limits BH3 mimetic antagonism.
BCL-xL exerts an essential cell survival function which relies on its hydrophobic groove binding to BH3 domain of BH3-only initiators and downstream BAX and BAK executioners. Combining resonance energy transfer assays and molecular dynamics simulations, we unravel that the C-terminal tail mediated subcellular membrane anchoring of BCL-xL selectively advantages binding to membrane-anchored PUMA initiator over BH3 mimetic ligands of the groove. This is due to the combined allosteric effect on BH3-in-groove binding of BCL-xL and PUMA tail anchors. Moreover, doubly anchored PUMA / BCL-xL complexes recruit endogenous BAX, which favors their antagonism by BH3 mimetics. BAX C-terminal tail anchor alone is sufficient to enhance BH3 mimetics induced death in cells expressing PUMA / BCL-xL. Thus, the survival function of BCL-xL is regulated by a complex interplay between its tail anchor and those of its interacting partners. This enables both resistance to pharmacological inhibitors and modulation by BAX, which functions as a crucial feedback disruptor of the BCL-xL network.
- Open Access
- 5 May 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Cell Death & Disease
- Vol. 11 (5) , 1-14
Dual targeting of BCL2 and MCL1 rescues myeloma cells resistant to BCL2 and MCL1 inhibitors associated with the formation of BAX/BAK hetero-complexes
Multiple myeloma is a plasma cell malignancy that escapes from apoptosis by heterogeneously over-expressing anti-apoptotic BCL2 proteins. Myeloma cells with a t(11;14) translocation present a particular vulnerability to BCL2 inhibition while a majority of myeloma cells relies on MCL1 for survival. The present study aimed to determine whether the combination of BCL2 and MCL1 inhibitors at low doses could be of benefit for myeloma cells beyond the single selective inhibition of BCL2 or MCL1. We identified that half of patients were not efficiently targeted neither by BCL2 inhibitor nor MCL1 inhibitor. Seventy percent of these myeloma samples, either from patients at diagnosis or relapse, presented a marked increase of apoptosis upon low dose combination of both inhibitors. Interestingly, primary cells from a patient in progression under venetoclax treatment were not sensitive ex vivo to neither venetoclax nor to MCL1 inhibitor, whereas the combination of both efficiently induced cell death. This finding suggests that the combination could overcome venetoclax resistance. The efficacy of the combination was also confirmed in U266 xenograft model resistant to BCL2 and MCL1 inhibitors. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that the combination of both inhibitors favors apoptosis in a BAX/BAK dependent manner. We showed that activated BAX was readily increased upon the inhibitor combination leading to the formation of BAK/BAX hetero-complexes. We found that BCLXL remains a major resistant factor of cell death induced by this combination. The present study supports a rational for the clinical use of venetoclax/S63845 combination in myeloma patients with the potential to elicit significant clinical activity when both single inhibitors would not be effective but also to overcome developed in vivo venetoclax resistance.
- 5 May 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Cell Death & Disease
- Vol. 11 (5) , 1-14
Open AccessDual targeting of BCL2 and MCL1 rescues myeloma cells resistant to BCL2 and MCL1 inhibitors associated with the formation of BAX/BAK hetero-complexes
Multiple myeloma is a plasma cell malignancy that escapes from apoptosis by heterogeneously over-expressing anti-apoptotic BCL2 proteins. Myeloma cells with a t(11;14) translocation present a particular vulnerability to BCL2 inhibition while a majority of myeloma cells relies on MCL1 for survival. The present study aimed to determine whether the combination of BCL2 and MCL1 inhibitors at low doses could be of benefit for myeloma cells beyond the single selective inhibition of BCL2 or MCL1. We identified that half of patients were not efficiently targeted neither by BCL2 inhibitor nor MCL1 inhibitor. Seventy percent of these myeloma samples, either from patients at diagnosis or relapse, presented a marked increase of apoptosis upon low dose combination of both inhibitors. Interestingly, primary cells from a patient in progression under venetoclax treatment were not sensitive ex vivo to neither venetoclax nor to MCL1 inhibitor, whereas the combination of both efficiently induced cell death. This finding suggests that the combination could overcome venetoclax resistance. The efficacy of the combination was also confirmed in U266 xenograft model resistant to BCL2 and MCL1 inhibitors. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that the combination of both inhibitors favors apoptosis in a BAX/BAK dependent manner. We showed that activated BAX was readily increased upon the inhibitor combination leading to the formation of BAK/BAX hetero-complexes. We found that BCLXL remains a major resistant factor of cell death induced by this combination. The present study supports a rational for the clinical use of venetoclax/S63845 combination in myeloma patients with the potential to elicit significant clinical activity when both single inhibitors would not be effective but also to overcome developed in vivo venetoclax resistance.
- Open Access
- 14 January 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 11 (1) , 1-16
STING-dependent paracriny shapes apoptotic priming of breast tumors in response to anti-mitotic treatment
A fascinating but uncharacterized action of antimitotic chemotherapy is to collectively prime cancer cells to apoptotic mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP), while impacting only on cycling cell subsets. Here, we show that a proapoptotic secretory phenotype is induced by activation of cGAS/STING in cancer cells that are hit by antimitotic treatment, accumulate micronuclei and maintain mitochondrial integrity despite intrinsic apoptotic pressure. Organotypic cultures of primary human breast tumors and patient-derived xenografts sensitive to paclitaxel exhibit gene expression signatures typical of type I IFN and TNFα exposure. These cytokines induced by cGAS/STING activation trigger NOXA expression in neighboring cells and render them acutely sensitive to BCL-xL inhibition. cGAS/STING-dependent apoptotic effects are required for paclitaxel response in vivo, and they are amplified by sequential, but not synchronous, administration of BH3 mimetics. Thus anti-mitotic agents propagate apoptotic priming across heterogeneously sensitive cancer cells through cytosolic DNA sensing pathway-dependent extracellular signals, exploitable by delayed MOMP targeting.
- 14 January 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Communications
- Vol. 11 (1) , 1-16
Open AccessSTING-dependent paracriny shapes apoptotic priming of breast tumors in response to anti-mitotic treatment
A fascinating but uncharacterized action of antimitotic chemotherapy is to collectively prime cancer cells to apoptotic mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP), while impacting only on cycling cell subsets. Here, we show that a proapoptotic secretory phenotype is induced by activation of cGAS/STING in cancer cells that are hit by antimitotic treatment, accumulate micronuclei and maintain mitochondrial integrity despite intrinsic apoptotic pressure. Organotypic cultures of primary human breast tumors and patient-derived xenografts sensitive to paclitaxel exhibit gene expression signatures typical of type I IFN and TNFα exposure. These cytokines induced by cGAS/STING activation trigger NOXA expression in neighboring cells and render them acutely sensitive to BCL-xL inhibition. cGAS/STING-dependent apoptotic effects are required for paclitaxel response in vivo, and they are amplified by sequential, but not synchronous, administration of BH3 mimetics. Thus anti-mitotic agents propagate apoptotic priming across heterogeneously sensitive cancer cells through cytosolic DNA sensing pathway-dependent extracellular signals, exploitable by delayed MOMP targeting.
- Open Access
- 10 December 2018
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood Advances
- Vol. 2 (23) , 3492-3505
p53 regulates CD46 expression and measles virus infection in myeloma cells
In this study, we assessed the sensitivity of myeloma cells to the oncolytic measles virus (MV) in relation to p53 using 37 cell lines and 23 primary samples. We showed that infection and cell death were correlated with CD46 expression, which was associated with TP53 status; TP53abn cell lines highly expressed CD46 and were preferentially infected by MV when compared with the TP53wt cell lines (P = .046 and P = .045, respectively). Infection of myeloma cells was fully dependent on CD46 expression in both cell lines and primary cells. In the TP53wt cell lines, but not the TP53abn cell lines, activation of the p53 pathway with nutlin3a inhibited both CD46 expression and MV infection, while TP53 silencing reciprocally increased CD46 expression and MV infection. We showed using a p53 chromatin immunoprecipitation assay and microRNA assessment that CD46 gene expression was directly and indirectly regulated by p53. Primary myeloma cells overexpressed CD46 as compared with normal cells and were highly infected and killed by MV. CD46 expression and MV infection were inhibited by nutlin3a in primary p53-competent myeloma cells, but not in p53-deficient myeloma cells, and the latter were highly sensitive to MV infection. In summary, myeloma cells were highly sensitive to MV and infection inhibition by the p53 pathway was abrogated in p53-deficient myeloma cells. These results argue for an MV-based clinical trial for patients with p53 deficiency.
- 10 December 2018
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood Advances
- Vol. 2 (23) , 3492-3505
Open Accessp53 regulates CD46 expression and measles virus infection in myeloma cells
In this study, we assessed the sensitivity of myeloma cells to the oncolytic measles virus (MV) in relation to p53 using 37 cell lines and 23 primary samples. We showed that infection and cell death were correlated with CD46 expression, which was associated with TP53 status; TP53abn cell lines highly expressed CD46 and were preferentially infected by MV when compared with the TP53wt cell lines (P = .046 and P = .045, respectively). Infection of myeloma cells was fully dependent on CD46 expression in both cell lines and primary cells. In the TP53wt cell lines, but not the TP53abn cell lines, activation of the p53 pathway with nutlin3a inhibited both CD46 expression and MV infection, while TP53 silencing reciprocally increased CD46 expression and MV infection. We showed using a p53 chromatin immunoprecipitation assay and microRNA assessment that CD46 gene expression was directly and indirectly regulated by p53. Primary myeloma cells overexpressed CD46 as compared with normal cells and were highly infected and killed by MV. CD46 expression and MV infection were inhibited by nutlin3a in primary p53-competent myeloma cells, but not in p53-deficient myeloma cells, and the latter were highly sensitive to MV infection. In summary, myeloma cells were highly sensitive to MV and infection inhibition by the p53 pathway was abrogated in p53-deficient myeloma cells. These results argue for an MV-based clinical trial for patients with p53 deficiency.
- Open Access
- 25 October 2018
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 13 (10) , e0206253
E2F1 binds to the peptide-binding groove within the BIR3 domain of cIAP1 and requires cIAP1 for chromatin binding
The cellular inhibitor of apoptosis 1 (cIAP1) is an E3-ubiquitin ligase that regulates cell signaling pathways involved in fundamental cellular processes including cell death, cell proliferation, cell differentiation and inflammation. It recruits ubiquitination substrates thanks to the presence of three baculoviral IAP repeat (BIR) domains at its N-terminal extremity. We previously demonstrated that cIAP1 promoted the ubiquitination of the E2 factor 1 (E2F1) transcription factor. Moreover, we showed that cIAP1 was required for E2F1 stabilization during the S phase of cell cycle and in response to DNA damage. Here, we report that E2F1 binds within the cIAP1 BIR3 domain. The BIR3 contains a surface hydrophobic groove that specifically anchors a conserved IAP binding motif (IBM) found in a number of intracellular proteins including Smac. The Smac N-7 peptide that includes the IBM, as well as a Smac mimetic, competed with E2F1 for interaction with cIAP1 demonstrating the importance of the BIR surface hydrophobic groove. We demonstrated that the first alpha-helix of BIR3 was required for E2F1 binding, as well as for the binding of Smac and Smac mimetics. Overexpression of cIAP1 modified the ubiquitination profile of E2F1, increasing the ratio of E2F1 conjugated with K11- and K63-linked ubiquitin chains, and decreasing the proportion of E2F1 modified by K48-linked ubiquitin chains. ChIP-seq analysis demonstrated that cIAP1 was required for the recruitment of E2F1 onto chromatin. Lastly, we identified an E2F-binding site on the cIAP1-encoding birc2 gene promoter, suggesting a retro-control regulation loop.
- 25 October 2018
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 13 (10) , e0206253
Open AccessE2F1 binds to the peptide-binding groove within the BIR3 domain of cIAP1 and requires cIAP1 for chromatin binding
The cellular inhibitor of apoptosis 1 (cIAP1) is an E3-ubiquitin ligase that regulates cell signaling pathways involved in fundamental cellular processes including cell death, cell proliferation, cell differentiation and inflammation. It recruits ubiquitination substrates thanks to the presence of three baculoviral IAP repeat (BIR) domains at its N-terminal extremity. We previously demonstrated that cIAP1 promoted the ubiquitination of the E2 factor 1 (E2F1) transcription factor. Moreover, we showed that cIAP1 was required for E2F1 stabilization during the S phase of cell cycle and in response to DNA damage. Here, we report that E2F1 binds within the cIAP1 BIR3 domain. The BIR3 contains a surface hydrophobic groove that specifically anchors a conserved IAP binding motif (IBM) found in a number of intracellular proteins including Smac. The Smac N-7 peptide that includes the IBM, as well as a Smac mimetic, competed with E2F1 for interaction with cIAP1 demonstrating the importance of the BIR surface hydrophobic groove. We demonstrated that the first alpha-helix of BIR3 was required for E2F1 binding, as well as for the binding of Smac and Smac mimetics. Overexpression of cIAP1 modified the ubiquitination profile of E2F1, increasing the ratio of E2F1 conjugated with K11- and K63-linked ubiquitin chains, and decreasing the proportion of E2F1 modified by K48-linked ubiquitin chains. ChIP-seq analysis demonstrated that cIAP1 was required for the recruitment of E2F1 onto chromatin. Lastly, we identified an E2F-binding site on the cIAP1-encoding birc2 gene promoter, suggesting a retro-control regulation loop.
- Open Access
- 12 December 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in EMBO Reports
- Vol. 19 (2) , 234-243
E2F1 interacts with BCL‐xL and regulates its subcellular localization dynamics to trigger cell death
E2F1 is the main pro‐apoptotic effector of the pRB‐regulated tumor suppressor pathway by promoting the transcription of various pro‐apoptotic proteins. We report here that E2F1 partly localizes to mitochondria, where it favors mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization. E2F1 interacts with BCL‐xL independently from its BH3 binding interface and induces a stabilization of BCL‐xL at mitochondrial membranes. This prevents efficient control of BCL‐xL over its binding partners, in particular over BAK resulting in the induction of cell death. We thus identify a new, non‐BH3‐binding regulator of BCL‐xL localization dynamics that influences its anti‐apoptotic activity. Synopsis E2F1 interacts with BCL‐xL, independently from its BH3 binding groove, and decreases the subcellular mobility of BCL‐xL. This interferes with its ability to inhibit mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilisation and accounts for transcription‐independent E2F1‐induced apoptosis. E2F1 exerts a non transcriptional pro‐apoptotic function at the mitochondria. E2F1 interacts with BCL‐xL. E2F1 negatively regulates BCL‐xL mobility. BCL‐xL mobility is required for efficient BAK dependent cell death inhibition.
- 12 December 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in EMBO Reports
- Vol. 19 (2) , 234-243
Open AccessE2F1 interacts with BCL‐xL and regulates its subcellular localization dynamics to trigger cell death
E2F1 is the main pro‐apoptotic effector of the pRB‐regulated tumor suppressor pathway by promoting the transcription of various pro‐apoptotic proteins. We report here that E2F1 partly localizes to mitochondria, where it favors mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization. E2F1 interacts with BCL‐xL independently from its BH3 binding interface and induces a stabilization of BCL‐xL at mitochondrial membranes. This prevents efficient control of BCL‐xL over its binding partners, in particular over BAK resulting in the induction of cell death. We thus identify a new, non‐BH3‐binding regulator of BCL‐xL localization dynamics that influences its anti‐apoptotic activity. Synopsis E2F1 interacts with BCL‐xL, independently from its BH3 binding groove, and decreases the subcellular mobility of BCL‐xL. This interferes with its ability to inhibit mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilisation and accounts for transcription‐independent E2F1‐induced apoptosis. E2F1 exerts a non transcriptional pro‐apoptotic function at the mitochondria. E2F1 interacts with BCL‐xL. E2F1 negatively regulates BCL‐xL mobility. BCL‐xL mobility is required for efficient BAK dependent cell death inhibition.
- Open Access
- 1 July 2017
- Published by Elsevier in SLAS Discovery
- Vol. 22 (6) , 751-759
Screening for Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors Using a Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET)–Based Assay in Yeast
- 1 July 2017
- Published by Elsevier in SLAS Discovery
- Vol. 22 (6) , 751-759
Open AccessScreening for Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitors Using a Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET)–Based Assay in Yeast
- Open Access
- 1 December 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Cell Reports
- Vol. 17 (12) , 3347-3358
Tight Sequestration of BH3 Proteins by BCL-xL at Subcellular Membranes Contributes to Apoptotic Resistance
- 1 December 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Cell Reports
- Vol. 17 (12) , 3347-3358
Open AccessTight Sequestration of BH3 Proteins by BCL-xL at Subcellular Membranes Contributes to Apoptotic Resistance