DSDáithí A. Stone

Dáithí A. Stone

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Dáithí A. Stone has a total of 289 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Recent extreme heatwaves are no match for future events

    by Philipp Aglas-Leitner, Sarah E. Perkins-Kirkpatrick, Lukas Brunner, Sabine Undorf, Florentina Aglas-Leitner, Erich Fischer, Dáithí A. Stone

    In recent years, record-breaking heatwaves have occurred over many regions of the Earth causing serious impacts to human and natural systems. Here we show that recently observed exceptional heatwaves are no match to potential future 21 st century events based on multiple metrics. For several observed heatwaves, this holds even under low- and medium-emissions scenarios. In a high- to very high-emissions future, many regions are projected to experience heatwaves that generate several times more cumulative heat and are many times longer (up to several months) than the observed heatwaves. Should the Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement not be implemented, in most regions a concerningly large proportion of projected heatwaves exceeds all analyzed heatwave characteristics at once. Our results underscore the crucial need for substantial emissions reduction and have important implications for adaptation measures, as a substantial proportion of projected heatwaves is well outside the recent lived experience.

  • Approaches, challenges and applications of climate change impact attribution

    by Sabine Undorf, Asya Dimitrova, Luke J. Harrington, Gabriele C. Hegerl, Aglaé Jézéquel, Joyce Kimutai, Y. T. Eunice Lo, Matthias Mengel, Sarah Perkins-Kirkpatrick, Rosa Pietroiusti, et al.


  • Open Access

    The Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP v2.0) contribution to CMIP7

    by Nathan P. Gillett, Isla R. Simpson, Gabi Hegerl, Reto Knutti, Dann Mitchell, Aurélien Ribes, Hideo Shiogama, Dáithí Stone, Claudia Tebaldi, Piotr Wolski, et al.

    The first version of the Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP v1.0) coordinated key simulations exploring the role of individual forcings in past, current and future climate as part of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 6 (CMIP6). The simulations have been used extensively in the literature for detection and attribution of long-term changes, constraining projections of climate change, attributing extreme events and understanding drivers of past and future simulated climate changes. Attribution studies using DAMIP v1.0 simulations underpinned prominent assessments of human-induced warming in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report. Here, we describe the set of DAMIP v2.0 simulations, proposed for the next phase of CMIP, CMIP7. Detection and attribution studies rely on pre-industrial control simulations and historical simulations, which will be part of the Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima (DECK) set of simulations for CMIP7. In addition, we identify the three highest-priority single-forcing experiments for CMIP7 to be run as “Assessment Fast Track” simulations in support of the Seventh Assessment Report of the IPCC: simulations with natural forcings only, anthropogenic well-mixed greenhouse gases only and anthropogenic aerosols only. Beyond this, the DAMIP v2.0 experimental design includes full-column ozone-only simulations and land-use-only simulations, such that the set of individual forcing experiments, when these are considered together, represents the full set of historical forcings. While concentration-driven simulations are prioritised for attribution, emissions-driven versions of the DAMIP experiments are also proposed to support understanding of the influence of carbon-cycle feedbacks on the simulated responses to individual forcings.


  • Open Access

    Fingerprint of anthropogenic climate change detected in long-term western North American fire weather trends

    by Laura E. Queen, Sam Dean, Dáithí Stone, Piyush Jain, James Renwick, Nathanael Melia, Yukiko Imada


  • Open Access

    Reply on CC1

    by Nathan P. Gillett, Isla R. Simpson, Gabi Hegerl, Reto Knutti, Dann Mitchell, Aurélien Ribes, Hideo Shiogama, Dáithí Stone, Claudia Tebaldi, Piotr Wolski, et al.

    The first version of the Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP v1.0) coordinated key simulations exploring the role of individual forcings in past, current and future climate as part of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 6 (CMIP6). The simulations have been used extensively in the literature for detection and attribution of long-term changes, constraining projections of climate change, extreme event attribution, and understanding drivers of past and future simulated climate changes. Attribution studies using DAMIP v1.0 simulations underpinned prominent assessments of human-induced warming in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report. Here we describe the set of DAMIP v2.0 simulations, proposed for the next phase of CMIP, CMIP7. Detection and attribution studies rely on preindustrial control simulations and historical simulations which will be part of the Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima (DECK) set of simulations for CMIP7. In addition, DAMIP v2.0 identifies three highest priority single forcing experiments for CMIP7 to be run as Fast Track simulations in support of the Seventh Assessment Report of the IPCC – namely simulations with natural forcings only, anthropogenic well-mixed greenhouse gases only, and anthropogenic aerosols only. Beyond this, the DAMIP v2.0 experimental design includes full column ozone-only simulations and land-use-only simulations, such that the set of individual forcings experiments, when considered together, represents the full set of historical forcings. While concentration driven simulations are prioritized for attribution of past changes, emissions-driven versions of the DAMIP experiments are also proposed to support understanding of the influence of carbon-cycle feedbacks on the simulated responses to individual forcings.

  • Open Access

    Detection and attribution of climate change impacts in coupled natural-human systems in the Andes

    by Ana Ochoa-Sánchez, Dáithí Stone, Fabian Drenkhan, Daniel Mendoza, Ronald Gualán, Christian Huggel


  • Open Access

    Reply on RC2

    by Nathan P. Gillett, Isla R. Simpson, Gabi Hegerl, Reto Knutti, Dann Mitchell, Aurélien Ribes, Hideo Shiogama, Dáithí Stone, Claudia Tebaldi, Piotr Wolski, et al.

    The first version of the Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP v1.0) coordinated key simulations exploring the role of individual forcings in past, current and future climate as part of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 6 (CMIP6). The simulations have been used extensively in the literature for detection and attribution of long-term changes, constraining projections of climate change, extreme event attribution, and understanding drivers of past and future simulated climate changes. Attribution studies using DAMIP v1.0 simulations underpinned prominent assessments of human-induced warming in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report. Here we describe the set of DAMIP v2.0 simulations, proposed for the next phase of CMIP, CMIP7. Detection and attribution studies rely on preindustrial control simulations and historical simulations which will be part of the Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima (DECK) set of simulations for CMIP7. In addition, DAMIP v2.0 identifies three highest priority single forcing experiments for CMIP7 to be run as Fast Track simulations in support of the Seventh Assessment Report of the IPCC – namely simulations with natural forcings only, anthropogenic well-mixed greenhouse gases only, and anthropogenic aerosols only. Beyond this, the DAMIP v2.0 experimental design includes full column ozone-only simulations and land-use-only simulations, such that the set of individual forcings experiments, when considered together, represents the full set of historical forcings. While concentration driven simulations are prioritized for attribution of past changes, emissions-driven versions of the DAMIP experiments are also proposed to support understanding of the influence of carbon-cycle feedbacks on the simulated responses to individual forcings.

  • Open Access

    Comment on egusphere-2024-4086

    by Nathan P. Gillett, Isla R. Simpson, Gabi Hegerl, Reto Knutti, Dann Mitchell, Aurélien Ribes, Hideo Shiogama, Dáithí Stone, Claudia Tebaldi, Piotr Wolski, et al.

    The first version of the Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP v1.0) coordinated key simulations exploring the role of individual forcings in past, current and future climate as part of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 6 (CMIP6). The simulations have been used extensively in the literature for detection and attribution of long-term changes, constraining projections of climate change, extreme event attribution, and understanding drivers of past and future simulated climate changes. Attribution studies using DAMIP v1.0 simulations underpinned prominent assessments of human-induced warming in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report. Here we describe the set of DAMIP v2.0 simulations, proposed for the next phase of CMIP, CMIP7. Detection and attribution studies rely on preindustrial control simulations and historical simulations which will be part of the Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima (DECK) set of simulations for CMIP7. In addition, DAMIP v2.0 identifies three highest priority single forcing experiments for CMIP7 to be run as Fast Track simulations in support of the Seventh Assessment Report of the IPCC – namely simulations with natural forcings only, anthropogenic well-mixed greenhouse gases only, and anthropogenic aerosols only. Beyond this, the DAMIP v2.0 experimental design includes full column ozone-only simulations and land-use-only simulations, such that the set of individual forcings experiments, when considered together, represents the full set of historical forcings. While concentration driven simulations are prioritized for attribution of past changes, emissions-driven versions of the DAMIP experiments are also proposed to support understanding of the influence of carbon-cycle feedbacks on the simulated responses to individual forcings.

  • Open Access

    Performance Evaluation of Weather@home2 Simulations over West African Region

    by Kamoru Abiodun Lawal, Oluwatosin Motunrayo Akintomide, Eniola Olaniyan, Andrew Bowery, Sarah N. Sparrow, Michael F. Wehner, Dáithí A. Stone

    Weather and climate forecasting, using climate models, have become essential tools and life-savers in the West African region; in spite of the fact that climate models do not fully comply with attributes of forecast qualities—RASAP: reliability, association, skill, accuracy, and precision. The objective of this paper is to quantitatively evaluate, in comparison to CRU and ERA5 datasets, the RASAP compliance-level of the weather@home2 modeling system (w@h2). Findings from some statistical evaluations show that, to a moderately significant extent, w@h2 model provides useful information during the monsoon seasons; skills to capture the Little Dry Season over the Guinea zone; predictive skills for the onset season; ability to reproduce all the annual characteristics of the surface maximum air temperature over the region; as well as skill to detect heat waves that usually ravage West Africa during the boreal spring. The model displays traces of attributes that are needed for seasonal climate predictions and applications. Deficiencies in the quantitative reproducibility point to the facts that the model does provide a reliability akin to that of regional climate models. This paper further furnishes a prospective user with information on whether the model might be “useful or not” for a particular application.


  • Open Access

    Comment on egusphere-2024-4086

    by Nathan P. Gillett, Isla R. Simpson, Gabi Hegerl, Reto Knutti, Dann Mitchell, Aurélien Ribes, Hideo Shiogama, Dáithí Stone, Claudia Tebaldi, Piotr Wolski, et al.

    The first version of the Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP v1.0) coordinated key simulations exploring the role of individual forcings in past, current and future climate as part of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 6 (CMIP6). The simulations have been used extensively in the literature for detection and attribution of long-term changes, constraining projections of climate change, extreme event attribution, and understanding drivers of past and future simulated climate changes. Attribution studies using DAMIP v1.0 simulations underpinned prominent assessments of human-induced warming in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report. Here we describe the set of DAMIP v2.0 simulations, proposed for the next phase of CMIP, CMIP7. Detection and attribution studies rely on preindustrial control simulations and historical simulations which will be part of the Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima (DECK) set of simulations for CMIP7. In addition, DAMIP v2.0 identifies three highest priority single forcing experiments for CMIP7 to be run as Fast Track simulations in support of the Seventh Assessment Report of the IPCC – namely simulations with natural forcings only, anthropogenic well-mixed greenhouse gases only, and anthropogenic aerosols only. Beyond this, the DAMIP v2.0 experimental design includes full column ozone-only simulations and land-use-only simulations, such that the set of individual forcings experiments, when considered together, represents the full set of historical forcings. While concentration driven simulations are prioritized for attribution of past changes, emissions-driven versions of the DAMIP experiments are also proposed to support understanding of the influence of carbon-cycle feedbacks on the simulated responses to individual forcings.