Wenxiong Xu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Wenxiong Xu has a total of 158 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Liang Peng
Department of Infectious Diseases, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
33 shared publications - Chan Xie
Department of Infectious Diseases, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
19 shared publications - Guangmei Yan
Department of Pharmacology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
12 shared publications - Wenbo Zhu
Department of Pharmacology, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
12 shared publications - Xingrong Zheng
Department of Infectious Disease The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐Sen University Guangzhou Guangdong China
12 shared publications - Songmin He
Guangzhou Virotech Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, China
11 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 7 May 2026
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Medical Virology
- Vol. 98 (5) , e70960
Tenofovir Alafenamide in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection in the High‐Replicative Low‐Inflammatory Phase: A 48‐Week Randomized Controlled Trial
Antiviral treatment for chronic HBV infection in the “high‐replicative low‐inflammatory” phase has not been widely recommended. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of antiviral therapy in this patient population and analyze peripheral immunological characteristics in relation to treatment response. In this randomized controlled trial, HBeAg‐positive patients with normal ALT and elevated HBV DNA were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive TAF 25 mg/day or observation. The primary endpoint was the decline from baseline in HBsAg at Week 48. Secondary endpoints included HBV DNA response rates and the magnitude of HBV DNA reduction. The treatment group was further divided into virological response (VR) and low‐level viremia (LLV) subgroups based on HBV DNA response at Week 48. PBMCs from VR ( n = 3) and LLV ( n = 3) patients underwent scRNA‐seq for comparative immunological analysis. A total of 59 patients were allocated to the treatment ( n = 30) and control ( n = 29) groups. No serious adverse events occurred, except for one control patient who developed an ALT flare and required antiviral initiation. At Week 48, the treatment group demonstrated significantly greater reductions in HBsAg (0.19 vs. 0 log10 IU/mL, p = 0.005) and HBV DNA (6.32 vs. 0.19 log10 IU/mL, p < 0.001) compared to controls. In the treatment group, 20% achieved HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL and 3.3% achieved HBeAg seroconversion, while none occurred in the untreated patients. PBMCs scRNA‐seq revealed dominant distributions of NK_FCER1G, NK_KLRF1, NK_XCL1, and NKT_FCGR3A subclusters in the VR group, with upregulated expression of genes such as SLC27A4 and PTMA . Taken together, our findings revealed that TAF demonstrates favorable safety and antiviral efficacy in patients with high‐replicative, low‐inflammatory HBV infection during the 48‐week follow‐up period, although complete virological suppression rates remain suboptimal. NK‐mediated mechanisms may contribute to antiviral success. Trial Registration: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 04231565).
- 7 May 2026
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Medical Virology
- Vol. 98 (5) , e70960
Open AccessTenofovir Alafenamide in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection in the High‐Replicative Low‐Inflammatory Phase: A 48‐Week Randomized Controlled Trial
Antiviral treatment for chronic HBV infection in the “high‐replicative low‐inflammatory” phase has not been widely recommended. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of antiviral therapy in this patient population and analyze peripheral immunological characteristics in relation to treatment response. In this randomized controlled trial, HBeAg‐positive patients with normal ALT and elevated HBV DNA were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive TAF 25 mg/day or observation. The primary endpoint was the decline from baseline in HBsAg at Week 48. Secondary endpoints included HBV DNA response rates and the magnitude of HBV DNA reduction. The treatment group was further divided into virological response (VR) and low‐level viremia (LLV) subgroups based on HBV DNA response at Week 48. PBMCs from VR ( n = 3) and LLV ( n = 3) patients underwent scRNA‐seq for comparative immunological analysis. A total of 59 patients were allocated to the treatment ( n = 30) and control ( n = 29) groups. No serious adverse events occurred, except for one control patient who developed an ALT flare and required antiviral initiation. At Week 48, the treatment group demonstrated significantly greater reductions in HBsAg (0.19 vs. 0 log10 IU/mL, p = 0.005) and HBV DNA (6.32 vs. 0.19 log10 IU/mL, p < 0.001) compared to controls. In the treatment group, 20% achieved HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL and 3.3% achieved HBeAg seroconversion, while none occurred in the untreated patients. PBMCs scRNA‐seq revealed dominant distributions of NK_FCER1G, NK_KLRF1, NK_XCL1, and NKT_FCGR3A subclusters in the VR group, with upregulated expression of genes such as SLC27A4 and PTMA . Taken together, our findings revealed that TAF demonstrates favorable safety and antiviral efficacy in patients with high‐replicative, low‐inflammatory HBV infection during the 48‐week follow‐up period, although complete virological suppression rates remain suboptimal. NK‐mediated mechanisms may contribute to antiviral success. Trial Registration: The trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 04231565).
- Open Access
- 29 January 2026
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Viral Hepatitis
- Vol. 33 (3) , e70141
Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate Reduces Virological Replication in HBeAg ‐Negative Patients With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase: A 48‐Week Randomised Controlled Trial
The optimal strategy for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infected patients with negative hepatitis B e‐antigen (HBeAg) and normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) treatment in this patient population. This prospective, open‐label, randomised controlled trial enrolled HBeAg‐negative patients with normal ALT and randomised them 1:1 to either the treatment group (TAF) or the control group (no treatment). The primary endpoint was the reduction in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels from baseline to week 48. A total of 62 patients were enrolled and followed up by 48 weeks ( n = 31 per group). No serious adverse events were reported. At week 48, there was no significant difference in the change in HBsAg between the treatment and control groups [0.01 (−0.06, 0.05) vs. −0.05 (−0.12, 0.06) log 10 IU/mL, p = 0.354]. However, HBV DNA levels were significantly lower in the treatment group (0 vs. 2.86 log 10 IU/mL, p < 0.001). All patients achieved HBV DNA below 20 IU/mL after treatment. Additionally, chitinase‐3‐like protein 1 level was lower in the treatment group (23.8 vs. 44.8 ng/mL, p = 0.019). TAF was well‐tolerated in HBeAg‐negative patients with normal ALT and low‐level HBV DNA viremia. Treatment for 48 weeks led to a high rate of HBV DNA suppression and may potentially delay liver fibrosis progression. Accordingly, early antiviral treatment may benefit this patient population. Trial Registration: Clinical trial number: NCT 04231565
- 29 January 2026
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Viral Hepatitis
- Vol. 33 (3) , e70141
Open AccessTenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate Reduces Virological Replication in HBeAg ‐Negative Patients With Normal Alanine Aminotransferase: A 48‐Week Randomised Controlled Trial
The optimal strategy for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infected patients with negative hepatitis B e‐antigen (HBeAg) and normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) treatment in this patient population. This prospective, open‐label, randomised controlled trial enrolled HBeAg‐negative patients with normal ALT and randomised them 1:1 to either the treatment group (TAF) or the control group (no treatment). The primary endpoint was the reduction in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels from baseline to week 48. A total of 62 patients were enrolled and followed up by 48 weeks ( n = 31 per group). No serious adverse events were reported. At week 48, there was no significant difference in the change in HBsAg between the treatment and control groups [0.01 (−0.06, 0.05) vs. −0.05 (−0.12, 0.06) log 10 IU/mL, p = 0.354]. However, HBV DNA levels were significantly lower in the treatment group (0 vs. 2.86 log 10 IU/mL, p < 0.001). All patients achieved HBV DNA below 20 IU/mL after treatment. Additionally, chitinase‐3‐like protein 1 level was lower in the treatment group (23.8 vs. 44.8 ng/mL, p = 0.019). TAF was well‐tolerated in HBeAg‐negative patients with normal ALT and low‐level HBV DNA viremia. Treatment for 48 weeks led to a high rate of HBV DNA suppression and may potentially delay liver fibrosis progression. Accordingly, early antiviral treatment may benefit this patient population. Trial Registration: Clinical trial number: NCT 04231565
- Open Access
- 15 October 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S4 from Clinical Evaluation of M1-c6v1 Oncolytic Virus Combined with Camrelizumab and Apatinib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Supplementary Figure 4. No positive viral copies were detected in 242 nasal swabs (3A), 242 urine samples (3B), and 108 stool samples (3C).
- 15 October 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S4 from Clinical Evaluation of M1-c6v1 Oncolytic Virus Combined with Camrelizumab and Apatinib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Supplementary Figure 4. No positive viral copies were detected in 242 nasal swabs (3A), 242 urine samples (3B), and 108 stool samples (3C).
- Open Access
- 15 October 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S1 from Clinical Evaluation of M1-c6v1 Oncolytic Virus Combined with Camrelizumab and Apatinib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Supplementary Table 1. Details of inclusion and Exclusion criteria
- 15 October 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S1 from Clinical Evaluation of M1-c6v1 Oncolytic Virus Combined with Camrelizumab and Apatinib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Supplementary Table 1. Details of inclusion and Exclusion criteria
- Open Access
- 15 October 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S3 from Clinical Evaluation of M1-c6v1 Oncolytic Virus Combined with Camrelizumab and Apatinib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Supplementary Figure 3. Viral Distribution and its correlation with efficacy.
- 15 October 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S3 from Clinical Evaluation of M1-c6v1 Oncolytic Virus Combined with Camrelizumab and Apatinib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Supplementary Figure 3. Viral Distribution and its correlation with efficacy.
- Open Access
- 15 October 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S3 from Clinical Evaluation of M1-c6v1 Oncolytic Virus Combined with Camrelizumab and Apatinib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Supplementary Table 3. Research process
- 15 October 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S3 from Clinical Evaluation of M1-c6v1 Oncolytic Virus Combined with Camrelizumab and Apatinib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Supplementary Table 3. Research process
- Open Access
- 15 October 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S4 from Clinical Evaluation of M1-c6v1 Oncolytic Virus Combined with Camrelizumab and Apatinib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Supplementary Table 4. Summary of drug exposure and treatment
- 15 October 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S4 from Clinical Evaluation of M1-c6v1 Oncolytic Virus Combined with Camrelizumab and Apatinib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Supplementary Table 4. Summary of drug exposure and treatment
- Open Access
- 15 October 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Figure S2 from Clinical Evaluation of M1-c6v1 Oncolytic Virus Combined with Camrelizumab and Apatinib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Supplementary Figure 2. Viral titer testing (CCID50/mL) from samples with positive viral RNA copies in serum.
- 15 October 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Figure S2 from Clinical Evaluation of M1-c6v1 Oncolytic Virus Combined with Camrelizumab and Apatinib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Supplementary Figure 2. Viral titer testing (CCID50/mL) from samples with positive viral RNA copies in serum.
- Open Access
- 15 October 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Table S2 from Clinical Evaluation of M1-c6v1 Oncolytic Virus Combined with Camrelizumab and Apatinib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Supplementary table 2. Representative of Study Participants
- 15 October 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Table S2 from Clinical Evaluation of M1-c6v1 Oncolytic Virus Combined with Camrelizumab and Apatinib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Supplementary table 2. Representative of Study Participants