Kai Yu

Kai Yu

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Kai Yu has a total of 14 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    WLRT-DR: Dual-Stage Wavelet Low-Rank Tensor Completion With Deep Networks for Cloud Removal in Satellite Imagery

    by Yu Zhang, Peng Zhang, Zhangxin Cai, Kai Yu, Feng Wang, Hongjian You, Hairong Tang

    Cloud contamination in multi-temporal remote sensing images, particularly due to thick clouds, significantly impacts the accuracy of environmental monitoring tasks. While existing Low-Rank Tensor Completion (LRTC) methods address cloud removal, they struggle with strict multi-temporal correlation requirements and poor generalization due to parameter sensitivity. To overcome these limitations, we propose WLRT-DR, a novel two-stage framework combining Wavelet-domain Low-Rank Tensor Completion with Deep Regularization. First, we introduce discrete wavelet transform (DWT) to decompose multi-temporal imagery into frequency-specific subbands (LL, LH, HL, HH). Empirical analysis reveals distinct low-rank properties in each subband, enabling targeted low-rank processing that better preserves spatial textures and structural continuity compared to unified spatial-domain LRTC. Second, we develop a dual-phase architecture where wavelet-domain LRTC (Stage 1) is synergistically combined with deep network regularization (Stage 2). This hybrid strategy leverages the complementary strengths: wavelet-domain low-rank recovery efficiently reconstructs fundamental spatial features, while pretrained deep networks impose non-linear constraints to enhance spectral fidelity. Comprehensive validation on simulated (Landsat data covering diverse Beijing landscapes) and real-world data demonstrates that WLRT-DR delivers enhanced reconstruction accuracy, robustness to complex spatio-temporal patterns, and improved processing efficiency. The framework provides an effective alternative for cloud reconstruction by integrating traditional tensor completion and deep learning in a novel manner.


  • Adaptive Transformer for Multitemporal Thick Cloud Reconstruction With Low-Intensity Reference

    by Yu Zhang, Hairong Tang, Peng Zhang, Kai Yu, Shunlin Liang

    Optical satellite imagery has become indispensable for Earth observation, yet thick cloud contamination severely impedes continuous monitoring capabilities. Current temporal-based methodologies present dual limitations: conventional approaches suffer from inefficient processing speeds and poor robustness, while existing deep learning-based solutions exhibit constrained temporal adaptability by relying on limited temporal information from single or fixed-period images. These inherent shortcomings consequently hinder their scalability in large-scale real-world applications. To address this challenge, we propose a Multi-temporal Adaptive Cloud Removal Transformer (MACRT), which uses a temporal aggregation strategy to integrate information from multiple reference images, reduce the constraint of reference image selection, and provide a more practical cloud removal solution. Since neighboring pixels of remote sensing images have strong correlations, the proposed network architecture introduces a novel spatio-spectral multi-head attention (SSMHA) module. This module decomposes the attention computation into two branches: coarse-resolution spatial and spectral, which work together to capture long-range dependencies across both dimensions while maintaining a compact parameter count. Extensive experiments on multispectral datasets (Landsat and Sentinel-2) demonstrate the superior performance of MACRT. Quantitative evaluations on Landsat imagery reveal improvements of 1.7 % in SSIM and 2.1° in SAM over state-of-the-art methods, achieving enhanced structural preservation and spectral accuracy. The source code, pretrained models, and all experimental results will be publicly available at https://github.com/Zhangyu-student/ACRT upon the paper’s acceptance.


  • FastVGBS: A Fast Version of the Volume-Gradient-Based Band Selection Method for Hyperspectral Imagery

    by Luyan Ji, Liangliang Zhu, Lei Wang, Yanxin Xi, Kai Yu, Xiurui Geng

    Recently, the volume-gradient-based band selection (VGBS) method has attracted more and more attention in the field of band selection. It is a ranking-based unsupervised algorithm which applies the sequential backward selection strategy to successively remove the most abundant band. The key finding of VGBS is that the band redundancy corresponds to the volume gradient matrix with respect to hyperspectral images. However, we have found that VGBS requires to update the gradient matrix after each band removal, which includes the calculation of the matrix inverse, determinant, and multiplication, and thus is time-consuming when the number of bands is large. In this letter, we first find that the norm of the row of the gradient matrix has a one-to-one correspondence to the diagonal element of the covariance matrix of the image. Further, we develop a recursive formula to calculate the inverse of the covariance matrix. The experimental results show the effectiveness of the method, i.e., we can reduce the computational complexity of VGBS with an order of magnitude.


  • Open Access

    A Study on Optimal Strategy in Relative Radiometric Calibration for Optical Sensors

    by Kai Yu, Suhong Liu, Yongchao Zhao

    Based on the analysis of three main factors involved in the relative radiometric calibration for optical sensors, namely: the number of radiance level; the number of measurements at each level; and the radiance level grouping method, an optimal strategy is presented in this paper for relative radiometric calibration. First, the maximization to the possible extent of either the number of the radiance level or the number of measurements at each level can improve the precision of the calibration results, where the recommended number of measurements is no less than 20. Second, when the number of the radiance level is divisible by four, dividing all the levels evenly into four groups by intensity gradient order and conducting averages for each group could achieve calibration results with the highest precision, which is higher than the result of no grouping or any other grouping method with the mean square error being 2 2 M n / I T (where M n is the mean square error of noise in the calibration data, I is the number of the radiance level, and T is the number of measurements for each level. In this case, the first two factors had an equivalent effect and showed their strongest effect on the precision. Third, when the calibration data were not evenly divided, the number of measurements demonstrated a stronger effect than the number of the radiance level. These cognitions are helping to achieve more precise relative radiometric calibration of optical sensors.