Adam S. Radomsky
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Adam S. Radomsky has a total of 159 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Roz Shafran
UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health University College London London UK
11 shared publications Andrea R. Ashbaugh
Concordia University
9 shared publications- Gillian M. Alcolado
Department of Clinical Health Psychology University of Manitoba Winnipeg, MB Canada
9 shared publications - Allison J. Ouimet
School of Psychology, University of Ottawa
7 shared publications Corinna M. Elliott
Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
7 shared publicationsLaurie A. Gelfand
Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada
7 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 13 July 2026
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
- Vol. 54 (2) , 123-133
Examining the associations between beliefs about losing control and eating disorder symptomatology
Background: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for eating disorders (EDs) does not yield consistent long-term recovery for all patients, highlighting the need to better understand underlying cognitive mechanisms. Recent work suggests that beliefs about losing control – particularly anticipated catastrophic consequences – may serve as key etiological and maintenance factors. Aim: This study examined whether negative beliefs about losing control predict general ED symptomatology in an undergraduate sample. Method: Data were drawn from a larger psychometric study on control-related constructs and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. A total of 262 undergraduate participants completed the Beliefs About Losing Control Inventory – Second Edition (BALCI-II), Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q 6.0), and Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Results: Simple linear regression indicated that BALCI-II total scores significantly predicted EDE-Q total scores ( adj. R 2 =.08, F 1,260 =23.61, p <.001). However, in a hierarchical regression, BALCI-II scores did not account for additional variance in ED symptoms beyond depression ( ΔR 2 =.18, ΔF 1,259 =.624, p =.43). Subscale analyses showed that fears of losing control leading to overwhelming emotions significantly predicted ED symptoms ( β =.22, t 259 =3.03, p =.006), whereas fears related to madness and dangerous behaviours were not significant predictors. Conclusion: Beliefs about losing control – especially fears of overwhelming emotions – appear to contribute to ED symptom maintenance. These findings provide initial psychometric support for prior qualitative research and suggest such beliefs may represent a meaningful treatment target within CBT. Future research should investigate causal relationships between these beliefs and ED psychopathology.
- 13 July 2026
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
- Vol. 54 (2) , 123-133
Open AccessExamining the associations between beliefs about losing control and eating disorder symptomatology
Background: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for eating disorders (EDs) does not yield consistent long-term recovery for all patients, highlighting the need to better understand underlying cognitive mechanisms. Recent work suggests that beliefs about losing control – particularly anticipated catastrophic consequences – may serve as key etiological and maintenance factors. Aim: This study examined whether negative beliefs about losing control predict general ED symptomatology in an undergraduate sample. Method: Data were drawn from a larger psychometric study on control-related constructs and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. A total of 262 undergraduate participants completed the Beliefs About Losing Control Inventory – Second Edition (BALCI-II), Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q 6.0), and Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Results: Simple linear regression indicated that BALCI-II total scores significantly predicted EDE-Q total scores ( adj. R 2 =.08, F 1,260 =23.61, p <.001). However, in a hierarchical regression, BALCI-II scores did not account for additional variance in ED symptoms beyond depression ( ΔR 2 =.18, ΔF 1,259 =.624, p =.43). Subscale analyses showed that fears of losing control leading to overwhelming emotions significantly predicted ED symptoms ( β =.22, t 259 =3.03, p =.006), whereas fears related to madness and dangerous behaviours were not significant predictors. Conclusion: Beliefs about losing control – especially fears of overwhelming emotions – appear to contribute to ED symptom maintenance. These findings provide initial psychometric support for prior qualitative research and suggest such beliefs may represent a meaningful treatment target within CBT. Future research should investigate causal relationships between these beliefs and ED psychopathology.
- Open Access
- 6 July 2026
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
- p. 1-17
The Vancouver Obsessional Compulsive Inventory-2 (VOCI-2)
Since the publication of the original Vancouver Obsessional Compulsive Inventory (VOCI), a large body of evidence demonstrating the prevalence and importance of newer symptom domains in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) (e.g. mental contamination, reassurance seeking, and symmetry, ordering, and arranging) has emerged. Although the VOCI has excellent psychometric properties, these developments point to the need for a revision. The present study aimed to revise the VOCI to provide a brief and up-to-date measure to assess OCD symptomatology. The development of the VOCI-2 is discussed, along with information about its reliability, validity and factor structure. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted on data obtained from 1108 non-clinical participants who completed the VOCI, the Vancouver Obsessional Compulsive Inventory – Mental Contamination Scale (VOCI-MC), the Symmetry Ordering and Arranging Questionnaire (SOAQ), and the Covert and Overt Reassurance Seeking Inventory (CORSI) to arrive at an updated measure, and clinical samples (primary diagnosis of OCD, n =59; anxious controls, n =42; depressed controls, n =18) completed the VOCI-2 to assess known-groups validity. The VOCI-2 consists of six distinctive factors reflecting symptom categories: Symmetry, Ordering and Arranging; Reassurance Seeking; Checking; Mental Contamination; Obsessions; and Contact Contamination. The updated questionnaire is characterized by strong reliability and validity, face valid items and subscales, is easy to administer and reflects a current understanding of the heterogeneous presentations of OCD. Future directions include additional validation in larger clinical samples and in other (e.g. treatment) contexts.
- 6 July 2026
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
- p. 1-17
Open AccessThe Vancouver Obsessional Compulsive Inventory-2 (VOCI-2)
Since the publication of the original Vancouver Obsessional Compulsive Inventory (VOCI), a large body of evidence demonstrating the prevalence and importance of newer symptom domains in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) (e.g. mental contamination, reassurance seeking, and symmetry, ordering, and arranging) has emerged. Although the VOCI has excellent psychometric properties, these developments point to the need for a revision. The present study aimed to revise the VOCI to provide a brief and up-to-date measure to assess OCD symptomatology. The development of the VOCI-2 is discussed, along with information about its reliability, validity and factor structure. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted on data obtained from 1108 non-clinical participants who completed the VOCI, the Vancouver Obsessional Compulsive Inventory – Mental Contamination Scale (VOCI-MC), the Symmetry Ordering and Arranging Questionnaire (SOAQ), and the Covert and Overt Reassurance Seeking Inventory (CORSI) to arrive at an updated measure, and clinical samples (primary diagnosis of OCD, n =59; anxious controls, n =42; depressed controls, n =18) completed the VOCI-2 to assess known-groups validity. The VOCI-2 consists of six distinctive factors reflecting symptom categories: Symmetry, Ordering and Arranging; Reassurance Seeking; Checking; Mental Contamination; Obsessions; and Contact Contamination. The updated questionnaire is characterized by strong reliability and validity, face valid items and subscales, is easy to administer and reflects a current understanding of the heterogeneous presentations of OCD. Future directions include additional validation in larger clinical samples and in other (e.g. treatment) contexts.
- Open Access
- 26 June 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Neuropsychologia
- Vol. 231, 109533
Seeing is believing: mental imagery amplifies moral, emotional, and motivational responding to mentally constructed hypothetical events
- 26 June 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Neuropsychologia
- Vol. 231, 109533
Open AccessSeeing is believing: mental imagery amplifies moral, emotional, and motivational responding to mentally constructed hypothetical events
- Open Access
- 24 November 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Cognitive Therapy and Research
- p. 1-13
Disorder Relevant or Disorder Specific: Fear of Losing Control in OCD and Panic Disorder
Background: Fear of losing control may play an important role in multiple anxiety disorders. However, the disorder relevance/ specificity of the construct has not been examined. The authors previously developed the novel Fear of Losing Control Inventory (FOLCI), with which the present study aimed to investigate the disorder relevance/ specificity of fear of losing control in OCD and panic disorder. Methods: The FOLCI, the Beliefs About Losing Control Inventory-II (BALCI-II) and a battery of psychological measures were administered to three groups: OCD ( N = 36), panic disorder ( N = 31) and healthy controls ( N = 33). Mixed model ANOVAs tested for differences between groups in terms of FOLCI and BALCI-II subscales. Results: As hypothesised, the OCD and panic groups reported greater fear of losing control than healthy controls across all FOLCI and BALCI-II subscales. Contrary to hypotheses, there were no significant differences between the OCD and panic groups in terms of the FOLCI’s Agent of Harm, Delayed Catastrophe and Imminent Catastrophe subscales. As hypothesised, the panic group scored significantly higher than the OCD group on the Bodily Sensations subscale. Non-hypothesised differences were also observed, with the panic group scoring significantly higher than the OCD group on the Escape and Avoidance subscale, and the Thoughts and Feelings subscale. Discussion: Findings suggest fear of losing control is relevant to both OCD and panic disorder. The findings suggest some aspects—specifically fear of losing control of bodily sensations, emotions (and thoughts) and escape and avoidance behaviours driven by feared loss of control, may be specific to panic disorder. The present findings extend previous research by demonstrating the relevance of feared loss of control—and of the FOLCI and BALCI-II as measures—within clinical groups.
- 24 November 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Cognitive Therapy and Research
- p. 1-13
Open AccessDisorder Relevant or Disorder Specific: Fear of Losing Control in OCD and Panic Disorder
Background: Fear of losing control may play an important role in multiple anxiety disorders. However, the disorder relevance/ specificity of the construct has not been examined. The authors previously developed the novel Fear of Losing Control Inventory (FOLCI), with which the present study aimed to investigate the disorder relevance/ specificity of fear of losing control in OCD and panic disorder. Methods: The FOLCI, the Beliefs About Losing Control Inventory-II (BALCI-II) and a battery of psychological measures were administered to three groups: OCD ( N = 36), panic disorder ( N = 31) and healthy controls ( N = 33). Mixed model ANOVAs tested for differences between groups in terms of FOLCI and BALCI-II subscales. Results: As hypothesised, the OCD and panic groups reported greater fear of losing control than healthy controls across all FOLCI and BALCI-II subscales. Contrary to hypotheses, there were no significant differences between the OCD and panic groups in terms of the FOLCI’s Agent of Harm, Delayed Catastrophe and Imminent Catastrophe subscales. As hypothesised, the panic group scored significantly higher than the OCD group on the Bodily Sensations subscale. Non-hypothesised differences were also observed, with the panic group scoring significantly higher than the OCD group on the Escape and Avoidance subscale, and the Thoughts and Feelings subscale. Discussion: Findings suggest fear of losing control is relevant to both OCD and panic disorder. The findings suggest some aspects—specifically fear of losing control of bodily sensations, emotions (and thoughts) and escape and avoidance behaviours driven by feared loss of control, may be specific to panic disorder. The present findings extend previous research by demonstrating the relevance of feared loss of control—and of the FOLCI and BALCI-II as measures—within clinical groups.
- Open Access
- 17 November 2025
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
- Vol. 53 (4) , 321-331
Psychometric evaluation and proposed revision of the Mental Contamination Report
Background/objectives: Substantial experimental research has explored mental contamination – feelings of internal pollution proposed to result from misinterpreting perceived violations. The Mental Contamination Report (MCR) was developed to measure in-the-moment experiences of mental contamination, and has been used in seminal experiments in this domain. However, the MCR has yet to be psychometrically evaluated. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the MCR, and if warranted, propose a revised version with improved research utility. Method: Data for this study were collected as part of a larger experiment examining the impact of moral self-violation on mental contamination. A sample of 150 undergraduate students completed the MCR, Vancouver Obsessional-Compulsive Inventory-Mental Contamination Subscale, and the Vancouver Obsessional-Compulsive Inventory. Results: The original Emotions Subscale of the MCR demonstrated excellent internal consistency ( ${\rm{\alpha }}$ =0.92) but contained emotions non-specific to mental contamination. We conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the emotion items to identify which items load more heavily onto a mental contamination-specific factor. The EFA revealed a two-factor solution, with five items items loading strongly on the mental contamination-specific factor. For the 5-item mental contamination-specific Emotions Subscale, we found excellent internal consistency ( ${\rm{\alpha }}$ =0.90), strong known groups validity, F 2,147 =63.17, p <.001, η p 2 =.46, good convergent validity and mixed results for divergent validity. For the Behavioural Urges Subscale, we found overall mixed psychometric properties. Conclusions: Based on the results of the psychometric analysis, a revised version of the MCR is proposed.- 17 November 2025
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
- Vol. 53 (4) , 321-331
Open AccessPsychometric evaluation and proposed revision of the Mental Contamination Report
Background/objectives: Substantial experimental research has explored mental contamination – feelings of internal pollution proposed to result from misinterpreting perceived violations. The Mental Contamination Report (MCR) was developed to measure in-the-moment experiences of mental contamination, and has been used in seminal experiments in this domain. However, the MCR has yet to be psychometrically evaluated. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the MCR, and if warranted, propose a revised version with improved research utility. Method: Data for this study were collected as part of a larger experiment examining the impact of moral self-violation on mental contamination. A sample of 150 undergraduate students completed the MCR, Vancouver Obsessional-Compulsive Inventory-Mental Contamination Subscale, and the Vancouver Obsessional-Compulsive Inventory. Results: The original Emotions Subscale of the MCR demonstrated excellent internal consistency ( ${\rm{\alpha }}$ =0.92) but contained emotions non-specific to mental contamination. We conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the emotion items to identify which items load more heavily onto a mental contamination-specific factor. The EFA revealed a two-factor solution, with five items items loading strongly on the mental contamination-specific factor. For the 5-item mental contamination-specific Emotions Subscale, we found excellent internal consistency ( ${\rm{\alpha }}$ =0.90), strong known groups validity, F 2,147 =63.17, p <.001, η p 2 =.46, good convergent validity and mixed results for divergent validity. For the Behavioural Urges Subscale, we found overall mixed psychometric properties. Conclusions: Based on the results of the psychometric analysis, a revised version of the MCR is proposed. - Open Access
- 12 June 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
- Vol. 46
A cognitive intervention for negative beliefs about losing control: impact on other cognitive domains and OCD symptoms
- 12 June 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders
- Vol. 46
Open AccessA cognitive intervention for negative beliefs about losing control: impact on other cognitive domains and OCD symptoms
- 27 January 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
- Vol. 18 (1) , 40-52
The Influence of Contamination-Related Cognitive Distortions in the Relationship Between Repugnant Obsessions and Mental Contamination
- 27 January 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
- Vol. 18 (1) , 40-52
The Influence of Contamination-Related Cognitive Distortions in the Relationship Between Repugnant Obsessions and Mental Contamination
- Open Access
- 15 January 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
- Vol. 87, 102004
Reappraising beliefs about losing control: An experimental investigation
- 15 January 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
- Vol. 87, 102004
Open AccessReappraising beliefs about losing control: An experimental investigation
- Open Access
- 1 December 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
- Vol. 86, 101998
Further analyses of appraisals of losing control and other OCD-related cognitions: A quasi-experimental investigation
- 1 December 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
- Vol. 86, 101998
Open AccessFurther analyses of appraisals of losing control and other OCD-related cognitions: A quasi-experimental investigation