Sola Kim

Background/Objectives: Initial cardiac rhythm is a known prognostic indicator in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, the impact of rhythm conversion during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on outcomes in patients undergoing extracorporeal CPR (ECPR) remains unclear. This study evaluated the association between initial and converted cardiac rhythms and outcomes in patients with refractory OHCA treated with ECPR. Methods: This nationwide retrospective observational study analyzed data from the Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Surveillance registry in South Korea (2008–2022). Patients were categorized into three groups: initial shockable rhythm (SR), non-shockable rhythm (NSR) converted to SR, and refractory NSR. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge; the secondary outcome was favorable neurological status (CPC 1–2). Results: Among 681 patients, 161 had initial SR, 345 had converted SR, and 175 had refractory NSR. Before matching, survival and CPC 1–2 rates were highest in the initial SR group (21.1% and 15.5%), followed by the converted SR group (19.4% and 11.6%), and lowest in the refractory NSR group (9.7% and 4.0%) (p < 0.01). After matching, CPC 1–2 remained significantly higher in the initial SR group (14.4%) and in the converted SR group (9.3%) vs. the refractory NSR group (5.1%, p = 0.016; 3.7%, p = 0.042). Persistent NSR was independently associated with poor neurological outcomes compared to both initial SR (AOR 0.337, p = 0.037) and converted SR (AOR 0.283, p = 0.020). Conclusions: Rhythm conversion from NSR to SR before ECPR was associated with significantly improved neurological outcomes. Rhythm conversion may serve as a prognostic marker and resuscitation target to guide ECPR decisions.

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the optimal ventilation mode during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by comparing the effects of chest compression-synchronized ventilation (CCSV) and intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV) on arterial blood gases. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled study included patients presenting with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who were randomly assigned to the CCSV or IPPV groups. Arterial blood gas analysis was performed at the start of CPR and 10 min after initiating mechanical ventilation. Primary outcomes included changes in the arterial oxygen and carbon dioxide pressures. Results: Of the 144 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, 30 were included in the study, with 15 each assigned to the CCSV and IPPV groups. The median arterial oxygen pressure in the CCSV group was 76.1 [22.8; 260.3 interquartile range], compared with 8.8 [−1.6; 113.9 interquartile range] in the IPPV group (p = 0.250). The change in carbon dioxide pressure was −10.3 [−18.3; −2.7 interquartile range] in the CCSV group and −11.5 [−39.5; 5.6 interquartile range] in the IPPV group (p = 0.935). Wilcoxon signed-rank test results revealed significant differences in arterial oxygen and carbon dioxide pressure levels before and after treatment in the CCSV group (p = 0.026 and 0.048, respectively). However, in the IPPV group, changes in arterial partial pressure of oxygen and carbon dioxide before and after treatment were non-significant (p = 0.095 and 0.107, respectively). Conclusions: Although CCSV significantly improved oxygenation and ventilation in patients undergoing CPR, it cannot be considered superior to IPPV.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education requires that learners practice key skills to promote mastery. Our aim in this study was to evaluate differences in post-education performance and class participation during CPR training between face-to- face (FF) and non-face-to-face (NFF) learning formats. This was a randomized controlled study of third-year medical students from two university hospital, allocated to either the FF or NFF format for CPR education. The learning scenario addressed single-person CPR, consisting of chest compression only, and excluded breathing. The Kahoot! application was used for NFF. Between-group comparisons for class participation and CPR skills were based on video recordings. Seventy students participated in our study, with 35 randomly allocated to the FF and NFF groups. There were no between-group differences in terms of age, sex, previous basic life support training, and willingness and confidence in performing CPR. Compared to the FF group, the NFF group demonstrated significant differences during CPR, including fewer calling for assistance and using of defibrillator (p = 0.006), as well as fewer checking for breathing (p = 0.007), and fewer counting during chest compression (p = 0.006). Additionally, < 30% of learners in the NFF group completed rhythm analysis after the last defibrillator shock delivery and resumed immediate chest compression (p < 0.001). All students in both groups passed the post-training assessment. Class participation in NFF learning was lower than that in FF learning. Although the post-education evaluation in the NFF group was not inferior, efforts on promoting active participation in NFF learning are required.

Purpose: The increasing use of electric personal mobility devices (ePMDs) has been accompanied by an increasing incidence of associated accidents. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of ePMD-related injuries and their associated factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the Emergency Department-based Injury In-depth Surveillance database from 2014 to 2018. All patients who were injured while operating an ePMD were eligible. The primary outcome was the rate of severe injury, defined as an excess mortality ratio-adjusted Injury Severity Score of ≥25. We calculated the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) of outcomes associated with ePMD-related injuries. Results: Of 1,391,980 injured patients, 684 (0.05%) were eligible for inclusion in this study. Their median age was 28 years old, and most injuries were sustained by men (68.0%). The rate of ePMD-related injuries increased from 3.1 injuries per 100,000 population in 2014 to 100.3 per 100,000 population in 2018. A majority of the injuries occurred on the street (32.7%). The most commonly injured area was the head and face (49.6%), and the most common diagnosis was superficial injuries or contusions (32.9%). Being aged 55 years or older (AOR=3.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33–11.36) and operating an ePMD while intoxicated (AOR=2.78; 95% CI 1.52–5.08) were associated with severe injuries. Conclusions: The number of emergency room visits due to ePMD-related injuries is increasing. Old age and drunk driving are both associated with serious injuries. Active traffic enforcement and safety regulations regarding ePMDs should be implemented to prevent severe injuries caused by ePMD-related accidents.

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, prehospital times were delayed for patients who needed to arrive at the hospital in a timely manner to receive treatment. To address this, in March 2020, the Korean government designated emergency medical centers for critical care (EMC-CC). This study retrospectively analyzed whether this intervention effectively reduced ambulance diversion (AD) and shortened prehospital times using emergency medical service records from 219,763 patients from the Gyeonggi Province, collected between 1 January and 31 December 2020. We included non-traumatic patients aged 18 years or older. We used interrupted time series analysis to investigate the intervention effects on the daily AD rate and compared prehospital times before and after the intervention. Following the intervention, the proportion of patients transported 30–35 km and 50 km or more was 13.8% and 5.7%, respectively, indicating an increased distance compared to before the intervention. Although the change in the AD rate was insignificant, the daily AD rate significantly decreased after the intervention. Prehospital times significantly increased after the intervention in all patients (p < 0.001) and by disease group; all prehospital times except for the scene time of cardiac arrest patients increased. In order to achieve optimal treatment times for critically ill patients in a situation that pushes the limits of the medical system, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, even regional distribution of EMC-CC may be necessary, and priority should be given to the allocation of care for patients with mild symptoms.

This study aimed to identify factors associated with the decision to transfer resuscitated patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) who were initially examined at hospitals with limited targeted temperature management capability (HLTC) in Korea. We included adult patients with OHCA who were initially transported to HLTC from 2012 to 2015. We limited the study population with OHCA who were admitted or transferred. Potential factors associated with the transfer decision were categorized as patient- or hospital-level characteristics. The primary outcome was emergency department disposition: transfer out versus admission to HLTC. A stepwise multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with the outcome. Of the 64,696 patients with OHCA, 37,705 (58.3%) were initially transported to HLTC. Approximately 44.7% of patients were transferred out. In terms of patient-level factors, age, socioeconomic status, and initial electrocardiogram rhythm were associated with the transfer decision. Hospital factors, such as percutaneous coronary intervention capability of HLTC (adjusted odds ratio = 0.16; 95% confidence interval = 0.14–0.19) and location of the metropolitan or urban hospital, were negatively associated with the transfer decision. Several hospital and patient factors were associated with the decision to transfer out patients with OHCA who were initially examined at HLTC.

Park JH, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Feb;34(9):e73. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e73