Aaron Yi Ding

Governments aim to embrace private-sector cloud services to benefit from scalability, economies of scale, and ease of use. At the same time, governments are reluctant to innovate, as a focus on sovereignty can make cloud services undesirable, and innovative use of cloud services is needed. Although research on challenges to cloud services for governments exists, public values and current developments towards sovereignty requires deeper analysis of the underlying forces driving. This paper investigates challenges addressed in previous research and analyses them using the Technological Innovation Systems (TIS) framework, as this provides in-depth analysis in internal and external functions that incorporate interactions and conflicts. TIS draws attention to the need to innovate the government cloud provider relationship. We found that incorporating public values such as transparency, sustainability, and privacy is pertinent to public services, but there are no approaches for incorporating them when moving to cloud services. In the current geopolitical environment, sovereignty and digital autonomy are increasingly considered in terms of varying degrees of independence. Furthermore, functions as the Guidance of the Search show conflicting forces that enhance complexity but provide a source of identified challenges in the literature. Sovereign clouds are under development as solutions for overcoming these problems. Cloud innovation systems should take public values and other specific public-sector aspects into account to enable the use of cloud services. Governmental adoption of cloud services and their challenges have their source in conflicting forces.

Federated unlearning (FUL) enables removing the data influence from the model trained across distributed clients, upholding the right to be forgotten as mandated by privacy regulations. FUL facilitates a value exchange where clients gain privacy-preserving control over their data contributions, while service providers leverage decentralized computing and data freshness. However, this entire proposition is undermined because clients have no reliable way to verify that their data influence has been provably removed, as current metrics and simple notifications offer insufficient assurance. We envision unlearning verification becoming a pivotal and trust-by-design part of the FUL life-cycle development, essential for highly regulated and data-sensitive services and applications like healthcare. This article introduces VeriFUL, a reference framework for verifiable FUL that formalizes verification entities, goals, approaches, and metrics. Specifically, we consolidate existing efforts and contribute new insights, concepts, and metrics to this domain. Finally, we highlight research challenges and identify potential applications and developments for verifiable FUL and VeriFUL.

AI is transforming the healthcare domain and is increasingly helping practitioners to make health-related decisions. Therefore, accountability becomes a crucial concern for critical AI-driven decisions. Although regulatory bodies, such as the EU Commission, provide guidelines, they are highlevel and focus on the “what” that should be done and less on the “how”, creating a knowledge gap for actors. Through an extensive analysis, we found that the term accountability is perceived and dealt with in many different ways, depending on the actor’s expertise and domain of work. With increasing concerns about AI accountability issues and the ambiguity around this term, this paper bridges the gap between the “what” and “how” of AI accountability, specifically for AI systems in healthcare. We do this by analysing the concept of accountability, formulating an accountability framework, and providing a three-tier structure for handling various accountability mechanisms. Our accountability framework positions the regulations of healthcare AI systems and the mechanisms adopted by the actors under a consistent accountability regime. Moreover, the three-tier structure guides the actors of the healthcare AI system to categorise the mechanisms based on their conduct. Through our framework, we advocate that decision-making in healthcare AI holds shared dependencies, where accountability should be dealt with jointly and should foster collaborations. We highlight the role of explainability in instigating communication and information sharing between the actors to further facilitate the collaborative process.

AI is transforming the healthcare domain and is increasingly helping practitioners to make health-related decisions. Therefore, accountability becomes a crucial concern for critical AI-driven decisions. Although regulatory bodies, such as the EU commission, provide guidelines, they are highlevel and focus on the ''what'' that should be done and less on the ''how'', creating a knowledge gap for actors. Through an extensive analysis, we found that the term accountability is perceived and dealt with in many different ways, depending on the actor's expertise and domain of work. With increasing concerns about AI accountability issues and the ambiguity around this term, this paper bridges the gap between the ''what'' and ''how'' of AI accountability, specifically for AI systems in healthcare. We do this by analysing the concept of accountability, formulating an accountability framework, and providing a three-tier structure for handling various accountability mechanisms. Our accountability framework positions the regulations of healthcare AI systems and the mechanisms adopted by the actors under a consistent accountability regime. Moreover, the three-tier structure guides the actors of the healthcare AI system to categorise the mechanisms based on their conduct. Through our framework, we advocate that decision-making in healthcare AI holds shared dependencies, where accountability should be dealt with jointly and should foster collaborations. We highlight the role of explainability in instigating communication and information sharing between the actors to further facilitate the collaborative process.

There is increasingly more evidence that automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems are biased against different speakers and speaker groups, e.g., due to gender, age, or accent. Research on bias in ASR has so far primarily focused on detecting and quantifying bias, and developing mitigation approaches. Despite this progress, the open question is how to measure the performance and bias of a system. In this study, we compare different performance and bias measures, from literature and proposed, to evaluate state-of-the-art end-to-end ASR systems for Dutch. Our experiments use several bias mitigation strategies to address bias against different speaker groups. The findings reveal that averaged error rates, a standard in ASR research, alone is not sufficient and should be supplemented by other measures. The paper ends with recommendations for reporting ASR performance and bias to better represent a system's performance for diverse speaker groups, and overall system bias.

The advancement and widespread adoption of computing technology has yielded services that could help mitigate the climate crisis. However, the retirement of obsolete equipment, the consumption of rare earth materials, and the escalating energy demands associated with massive data processing and cloud infrastructures have raised new environmental dilemmas. Existing design and development methodologies primarily focus on fulfilling functional requirements and improving performance. In this paper, we argue that these methodologies must be augmented with sustainability considerations encompassing energy efficiency, material usage, longevity, and upgradability. Solutions at different layers of the system stack, from the physical to the application layer, must be integrated. Moreover, there should be a strong focus on the transparency of sustainability metrics across the whole computing continuum. Building on fruitful discussions at the international Lorentz workshop on Future Computing for Digital Infrastructures, we advocate novel approaches in the design, development, and operation of the computing continuum.

Vulnerable road users (VRUs), including pedestrians, cyclists, and motorcyclists, account for approximately 50% of road traffic fatalities globally, as per the World Health Organization. In these scenarios, the accuracy and fairness of perception applications used in autonomous driving become critical to reduce such risks. For machine learning models, performing object classification and detection tasks, the focus has been on improving accuracy and enhancing model performance metrics; however, issues such as biases inherited in models, statistical imbalances and disparities within the datasets are often overlooked. Our research addresses these issues by exploring class imbalances among vulnerable road users by focusing on class distribution analysis, evaluating model performance, and bias impact assessment. Using popular CNN models and Vision Transformers (ViTs) with the nuScenes dataset, our performance evaluation shows detection disparities for underrepresented classes. Compared to related work, we focus on metric-specific and cost-sensitive learning for model optimization and bias mitigation, which includes data augmentation and resampling. Using the proposed mitigation approaches, we see improvement in IoU(%) and NDS(%) metrics from 71.3 to 75.6 and 80.6 to 83.7 for the CNN model. Similarly, for ViT, we observe improvement in IoU and NDS metrics from 74.9 to 79.2 and 83.8 to 87.1. This research contributes to developing reliable models while addressing inclusiveness for minority classes in datasets. Code can be accessed at: BiasDet.

Vision transformer (ViTs) models have shown higher accuracy, robustness and large volume data processing ability, creating new baselines and references for perception tasks. However, these advantages require large memory and high-performance processors and computing units, which makes model adaptability and deployment challenging within resource-constrained environments such as memory-restricted and battery-powered edge devices. This paper addresses the model deployment challenges by proposing a model approximation approach VI-ViT, for edge deployment using variational inference with mixed precision for processing multi-modalities, such as point clouds and images. Our experimental evaluation on the nuScenes and Waymo datasets show up to 37% and 31% reduction in model parameters and Flops while maintaining a mean average precision of 70.5 compared to 74.8 of the baseline model. This work presents a practical deployment approach for approximating and optimizing Vision Transformers for edge AI applications by balancing model metrics such as parameters, flops, latency, energy consumption, and accuracy, which can easily be adapted to other transformer models and datasets.

Developing and deploying resource-aware AI models presents a compelling optimization challenge in edge computing and serverless domains. Current research mainly focuses on scalable training and inference using serverless frameworks to optimize operational costs. However, these approaches often overlook the challenges of heterogeneous-aware training and overall cost optimization, including computing, memory, and communication. Our work introduces a framework for a heterogeneous edge environment, focusing on the model and key performance metrics like accuracy, FLOPs, number of parameters, and latency. This framework enables distributed training within a serverless architecture. Further, it explores the construction of ML models from existing serverless functions using a look-up table while estimating AI model training in edge, cloud or hybrid settings. We test the framework on object detection tasks in AI model development and deployment using serverless operations.