Xin Qu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Xin Qu has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Alex Hall
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences University of California Los Angeles CA USA
5 shared publications - Anthony M. DeAngelis
Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland
2 shared publications - Chad W. Thackeray
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
2 shared publications - Daniel L. Swain
California Institute for Water Resources University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources Davis California USA
1 shared publication - Fengpeng Sun
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Missouri–Kansas City Kansas MI USA
1 shared publication - Kevin W. Bowman
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena CA USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 12 December 2018
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Geophysical Research Letters
- Vol. 45 (23) , 13050-13059
A Hierarchical Statistical Framework for Emergent Constraints: Application to Snow‐Albedo Feedback
- 12 December 2018
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Geophysical Research Letters
- Vol. 45 (23) , 13050-13059
Open AccessA Hierarchical Statistical Framework for Emergent Constraints: Application to Snow‐Albedo Feedback
- Open Access
- 23 October 2018
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Geophysical Research Letters
- Vol. 45 (20) , 11343-11351
On the Connection Between Global Hydrologic Sensitivity and Regional Wet Extremes
- 23 October 2018
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Geophysical Research Letters
- Vol. 45 (20) , 11343-11351
Open AccessOn the Connection Between Global Hydrologic Sensitivity and Regional Wet Extremes
- Open Access
- 23 June 2018
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Geophysical Research Letters
- Vol. 45 (12) , 6223-6231
Why Do Models Produce Spread in Snow Albedo Feedback?
Key Points: Structurally varying snowpack, vegetation, and albedo parameterizations drive most of the intermodel spread in snow albedo feedback Many models now exhibit a more realistic feedback than in the past, but issues with two models limit the reduction in ensemble spread Preliminary signs from ongoing model development are positive and suggest a likely reduction in spread among upcoming models
- 23 June 2018
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Geophysical Research Letters
- Vol. 45 (12) , 6223-6231
Open AccessWhy Do Models Produce Spread in Snow Albedo Feedback?
Key Points: Structurally varying snowpack, vegetation, and albedo parameterizations drive most of the intermodel spread in snow albedo feedback Many models now exhibit a more realistic feedback than in the past, but issues with two models limit the reduction in ensemble spread Preliminary signs from ongoing model development are positive and suggest a likely reduction in spread among upcoming models
- Open Access
- 26 December 2016
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Geophysical Research Letters
- Vol. 43 (24)
Importance of vegetation processes for model spread in the fast precipitation response to CO2 forcing
In the current generation of climate models, the projected increase in global precipitation over the 21st century ranges from 2% to 10% under a high‐emission scenario. Some of this uncertainty can be traced to the rapid response to carbon dioxide (CO2) forcing. We analyze an ensemble of simulations to better understand model spread in this rapid response. A substantial amount is linked to how the land surface partitions a change in latent versus sensible heat flux in response to the CO2‐induced radiative perturbation; a larger increase in sensible heat results in a larger decrease in global precipitation. Model differences in the land surface response appear to be strongly related to the vegetation response to increased CO2, specifically, the closure of leaf stomata. Future research should thus focus on evaluation of the vegetation physiological response, including stomatal conductance parameterizations, for the purpose of constraining the fast response of Earth's hydrologic cycle to CO2 forcing.
- 26 December 2016
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Geophysical Research Letters
- Vol. 43 (24)
Open AccessImportance of vegetation processes for model spread in the fast precipitation response to CO2 forcing
In the current generation of climate models, the projected increase in global precipitation over the 21st century ranges from 2% to 10% under a high‐emission scenario. Some of this uncertainty can be traced to the rapid response to carbon dioxide (CO2) forcing. We analyze an ensemble of simulations to better understand model spread in this rapid response. A substantial amount is linked to how the land surface partitions a change in latent versus sensible heat flux in response to the CO2‐induced radiative perturbation; a larger increase in sensible heat results in a larger decrease in global precipitation. Model differences in the land surface response appear to be strongly related to the vegetation response to increased CO2, specifically, the closure of leaf stomata. Future research should thus focus on evaluation of the vegetation physiological response, including stomatal conductance parameterizations, for the purpose of constraining the fast response of Earth's hydrologic cycle to CO2 forcing.
- Open Access
- 5 September 2011
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Vol. 11 (17) , 9053-9065
On the relationship between low cloud variability and lower tropospheric stability in the Southeast Pacific
In this study, we examine marine low cloud cover variability in the Southeast Pacific and its association with lower-tropospheric stability (LTS) across a spectrum of timescales. On both daily and interannual timescales, LTS and low cloud amount are very well correlated in austral summer (DJF). Meanwhile in winter (JJA), when ambient LTS increases, the LTS–low cloud relationship substantially weakens. The DJF LTS–low cloud relationship also weakens in years with unusually large ambient LTS values. These are generally strong El Niño years, in which DJF LTS values are comparable to those typically found in JJA. Thus the LTS–low cloud relationship is strongly modulated by the seasonal cycle and the ENSO phenomenon. We also investigate the origin of LTS anomalies closely associated with low cloud variability during austral summer. We find that the ocean and atmosphere are independently involved in generating anomalies in LTS and hence variability in the Southeast Pacific low cloud deck. This highlights the importance of the physical (as opposed to chemical) component of the climate system in generating internal variability in low cloud cover. It also illustrates the coupled nature of the climate system in this region, and raises the possibility of cloud feedbacks related to LTS. We conclude by addressing the implications of the LTS–low cloud relationship in the Southeast Pacific for low cloud feedbacks in anthropogenic climate change.
- 5 September 2011
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Vol. 11 (17) , 9053-9065
Open AccessOn the relationship between low cloud variability and lower tropospheric stability in the Southeast Pacific
In this study, we examine marine low cloud cover variability in the Southeast Pacific and its association with lower-tropospheric stability (LTS) across a spectrum of timescales. On both daily and interannual timescales, LTS and low cloud amount are very well correlated in austral summer (DJF). Meanwhile in winter (JJA), when ambient LTS increases, the LTS–low cloud relationship substantially weakens. The DJF LTS–low cloud relationship also weakens in years with unusually large ambient LTS values. These are generally strong El Niño years, in which DJF LTS values are comparable to those typically found in JJA. Thus the LTS–low cloud relationship is strongly modulated by the seasonal cycle and the ENSO phenomenon. We also investigate the origin of LTS anomalies closely associated with low cloud variability during austral summer. We find that the ocean and atmosphere are independently involved in generating anomalies in LTS and hence variability in the Southeast Pacific low cloud deck. This highlights the importance of the physical (as opposed to chemical) component of the climate system in generating internal variability in low cloud cover. It also illustrates the coupled nature of the climate system in this region, and raises the possibility of cloud feedbacks related to LTS. We conclude by addressing the implications of the LTS–low cloud relationship in the Southeast Pacific for low cloud feedbacks in anthropogenic climate change.