Elena Cubedo
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Elena Cubedo has a total of 97 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jesús García-Foncillas
Translational Oncology Division, OncohealthInstitute, IIS-Fundación Jimenez Diaz-UAM (Madrid), Spain
8 shared publications - Carmen Sanmartín
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain
7 shared publications - María Font
Facultad de Farmacia y Nutrición de la Universidad de Navarra, Irunlarrea nℴ1, 31008 Pamplona;
7 shared publications - Eva Bandrés
Immunology Unit, Hematology Department Hospital Universitario de Navarra Pamplona Spain
6 shared publications Izidore S. Lossos
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL
5 shared publicationsLucia Cordeu
5 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 7 June 2016
- Published by Impact Journals, LLC in Oncotarget
- Vol. 7 (28) , 43689-43702
Blocking the PAH2 domain of Sin3A inhibits tumorigenesis and confers retinoid sensitivity in triple negative breast cancer
Blocking the PAH2 domain of Sin3A inhibits tumorigenesis and confers retinoid sensitivity in triple negative breast cancer
- 7 June 2016
- Published by Impact Journals, LLC in Oncotarget
- Vol. 7 (28) , 43689-43702
Open AccessBlocking the PAH2 domain of Sin3A inhibits tumorigenesis and confers retinoid sensitivity in triple negative breast cancer
Blocking the PAH2 domain of Sin3A inhibits tumorigenesis and confers retinoid sensitivity in triple negative breast cancer
- Open Access
- 7 June 2012
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood
- Vol. 119 (23) , 5478-5491
Identification of LMO2 transcriptome and interactome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
LMO2 regulates gene expression by facilitating the formation of multipartite DNA-binding complexes. In B cells, LMO2 is specifically up-regulated in the germinal center (GC) and is expressed in GC-derived non-Hodgkin lymphomas. LMO2 is one of the most powerful prognostic indicators in diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL) patients. However, its function in GC B cells and DLBCL is currently unknown. In this study, we characterized the LMO2 transcriptome and transcriptional complex in DLBCL cells. LMO2 regulates genes implicated in kinetochore function, chromosome assembly, and mitosis. Overexpression of LMO2 in DLBCL cell lines results in centrosome amplification. In DLBCL, the LMO2 complex contains some of the traditional partners, such as LDB1, E2A, HEB, Lyl1, ETO2, and SP1, but not TAL1 or GATA proteins. Furthermore, we identified novel LMO2 interacting partners: ELK1, nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFATc1), and lymphoid enhancer-binding factor1 (LEF1) proteins. Reporter assays revealed that LMO2 increases transcriptional activity of NFATc1 and decreases transcriptional activity of LEF1 proteins. Overall, our studies identified a novel LMO2 transcriptome and interactome in DLBCL and provides a platform for future elucidation of LMO2 function in GC B cells and DLBCL pathogenesis.
- 7 June 2012
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood
- Vol. 119 (23) , 5478-5491
Open AccessIdentification of LMO2 transcriptome and interactome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
LMO2 regulates gene expression by facilitating the formation of multipartite DNA-binding complexes. In B cells, LMO2 is specifically up-regulated in the germinal center (GC) and is expressed in GC-derived non-Hodgkin lymphomas. LMO2 is one of the most powerful prognostic indicators in diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL) patients. However, its function in GC B cells and DLBCL is currently unknown. In this study, we characterized the LMO2 transcriptome and transcriptional complex in DLBCL cells. LMO2 regulates genes implicated in kinetochore function, chromosome assembly, and mitosis. Overexpression of LMO2 in DLBCL cell lines results in centrosome amplification. In DLBCL, the LMO2 complex contains some of the traditional partners, such as LDB1, E2A, HEB, Lyl1, ETO2, and SP1, but not TAL1 or GATA proteins. Furthermore, we identified novel LMO2 interacting partners: ELK1, nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFATc1), and lymphoid enhancer-binding factor1 (LEF1) proteins. Reporter assays revealed that LMO2 increases transcriptional activity of NFATc1 and decreases transcriptional activity of LEF1 proteins. Overall, our studies identified a novel LMO2 transcriptome and interactome in DLBCL and provides a platform for future elucidation of LMO2 function in GC B cells and DLBCL pathogenesis.
- 12 January 2012
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood
- Vol. 119 (2) , 513-520
miR-155 regulates HGAL expression and increases lymphoma cell motility
HGAL, a prognostic biomarker in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and classic Hodgkin lymphoma, inhibits lymphocyte and lymphoma cell motility by activating the RhoA signaling cascade and interacting with actin and myosin proteins. Although HGAL expression is limited to germinal center (GC) lymphocytes and GC-derived lymphomas, little is known about its regulation. miR-155 is implicated in control of GC reaction and lymphomagenesis. We demonstrate that miR-155 directly down-regulates HGAL expression by binding to its 3′-untranslated region, leading to decreased RhoA activation and increased spontaneous and chemoattractant-induced lymphoma cell motility. The effects of miR-155 on RhoA activation and cell motility can be rescued by transfection of HGAL lacking the miR-155 binding site. This inhibitory effect of miR-155 suggests that it may have a key role in the loss of HGAL expression on differentiation of human GC B cells to plasma cell. Furthermore, this effect may contribute to lymphoma cell dissemination and aggressiveness, characteristic of activated B cell–like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma typically expressing high levels of miR-155 and lacking HGAL expression.
- 12 January 2012
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood
- Vol. 119 (2) , 513-520
miR-155 regulates HGAL expression and increases lymphoma cell motility
HGAL, a prognostic biomarker in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and classic Hodgkin lymphoma, inhibits lymphocyte and lymphoma cell motility by activating the RhoA signaling cascade and interacting with actin and myosin proteins. Although HGAL expression is limited to germinal center (GC) lymphocytes and GC-derived lymphomas, little is known about its regulation. miR-155 is implicated in control of GC reaction and lymphomagenesis. We demonstrate that miR-155 directly down-regulates HGAL expression by binding to its 3′-untranslated region, leading to decreased RhoA activation and increased spontaneous and chemoattractant-induced lymphoma cell motility. The effects of miR-155 on RhoA activation and cell motility can be rescued by transfection of HGAL lacking the miR-155 binding site. This inhibitory effect of miR-155 suggests that it may have a key role in the loss of HGAL expression on differentiation of human GC B cells to plasma cell. Furthermore, this effect may contribute to lymphoma cell dissemination and aggressiveness, characteristic of activated B cell–like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma typically expressing high levels of miR-155 and lacking HGAL expression.
- Open Access
- 1 July 2011
- Published by Wiley in The FEBS Journal
- Vol. 278 (17) , 3065-3075
PRDM1/Blimp1 downregulates expression of germinal center genes LMO2 and HGAL
Human germinal center‐associated lymphoma (HGAL) and LIM domain only‐2 (LMO2) are proteins highly expressed in germinal center (GC) B lymphocytes. HGAL and LMO2 are also expressed in GC‐derived lymphomas and distinguish biologically distinct subgroups of diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas (DLBCL) associated with improved survival. However, little is known about their regulation. PRDM1/Blimp1 is a master regulator of terminal B cell differentiation and may also function as a tumor suppressor in the pathogenesis of DLBCL, where it is frequently inactivated by mutations and deletions. We now demonstrate that both HGAL and LMO2 are directly regulated by the transcription repressor PRDM1. In vivo studies demonstrate that PRDM1 directly binds to the recognition sites within the upstream promoters of both HGAL and LMO2. PRDM1 binding suppresses endogenous protein and mRNA levels of HGAL and LMO2. In addition, promoter analysis reveals that site‐specific binding of PRDM1 to the promoters is capable of repressing transcriptional activity. This inhibitory effect of PRDM1 suggests that it has a key role in the loss of HGAL and LMO2 expression upon differentiation of GC B cells to plasma cells and may also contribute to absence of HGAL and LMO2 expression in post‐GC lymphoid tumors.
- 1 July 2011
- Published by Wiley in The FEBS Journal
- Vol. 278 (17) , 3065-3075
Open AccessPRDM1/Blimp1 downregulates expression of germinal center genes LMO2 and HGAL
Human germinal center‐associated lymphoma (HGAL) and LIM domain only‐2 (LMO2) are proteins highly expressed in germinal center (GC) B lymphocytes. HGAL and LMO2 are also expressed in GC‐derived lymphomas and distinguish biologically distinct subgroups of diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas (DLBCL) associated with improved survival. However, little is known about their regulation. PRDM1/Blimp1 is a master regulator of terminal B cell differentiation and may also function as a tumor suppressor in the pathogenesis of DLBCL, where it is frequently inactivated by mutations and deletions. We now demonstrate that both HGAL and LMO2 are directly regulated by the transcription repressor PRDM1. In vivo studies demonstrate that PRDM1 directly binds to the recognition sites within the upstream promoters of both HGAL and LMO2. PRDM1 binding suppresses endogenous protein and mRNA levels of HGAL and LMO2. In addition, promoter analysis reveals that site‐specific binding of PRDM1 to the promoters is capable of repressing transcriptional activity. This inhibitory effect of PRDM1 suggests that it has a key role in the loss of HGAL and LMO2 expression upon differentiation of GC B cells to plasma cells and may also contribute to absence of HGAL and LMO2 expression in post‐GC lymphoid tumors.
- Open Access
- 9 December 2010
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood
- Vol. 116 (24) , 5217-5227
HGAL, a germinal center specific protein, decreases lymphoma cell motility by modulation of the RhoA signaling pathway
HGAL is a germinal center (GC)–specific gene that negatively regulates lymphocyte motility and whose expression predicts improved survival of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). We demonstrate that HGAL serves as a regulator of the RhoA signaling pathway. HGAL enhances activation of RhoA and its down-stream effectors by a novel mechanism – direct binding to the catalytic DH-domain of the RhoA-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factors (RhoGEFs) PDZ-RhoGEF and LARG that stimulate the GDP-GTP exchange rate of RhoA. We delineate the structural domain of HGAL that mediates its interaction with the PDZ-RhoGEF protein. These observations reveal a novel molecular mechanism underlying the inhibitory effects of GC-specific HGAL protein on the motility of GC-derived lymphoma cells. This mechanism may underlie the limited dissemination and better outcome of patients with HGAL-expressing DLBCL and cHL.
- 9 December 2010
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood
- Vol. 116 (24) , 5217-5227
Open AccessHGAL, a germinal center specific protein, decreases lymphoma cell motility by modulation of the RhoA signaling pathway
HGAL is a germinal center (GC)–specific gene that negatively regulates lymphocyte motility and whose expression predicts improved survival of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). We demonstrate that HGAL serves as a regulator of the RhoA signaling pathway. HGAL enhances activation of RhoA and its down-stream effectors by a novel mechanism – direct binding to the catalytic DH-domain of the RhoA-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factors (RhoGEFs) PDZ-RhoGEF and LARG that stimulate the GDP-GTP exchange rate of RhoA. We delineate the structural domain of HGAL that mediates its interaction with the PDZ-RhoGEF protein. These observations reveal a novel molecular mechanism underlying the inhibitory effects of GC-specific HGAL protein on the motility of GC-derived lymphoma cells. This mechanism may underlie the limited dissemination and better outcome of patients with HGAL-expressing DLBCL and cHL.
- 7 April 2010
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Leukemia & Lymphoma
- Vol. 51 (7) , 1200-1216
Expression profiles of adult T-cell leukemia–lymphoma and associations with clinical responses to zidovudine and interferon α
Adult T-cell leukemia–lymphoma (ATLL) is an HTLV-1-associated lymphoproliferative malignancy that is frequently fatal. We compared gene expression profiles (GEPs) of leukemic specimens from nine patients with ATLL at the time of diagnosis and immediately after combination therapy with zidovudine (AZT) and interferon α (IFNα). GEPs were also related to genetic aberrations determined by comparative genomic hybridization. We identified several genes anomalously over-expressed in the ATLL leukemic cells at the mRNA level, including LYN, CSPG2, and LMO2, and confirmed LMO2 expression in ATLL cells at the protein level. In vivo AZT–IFNα therapy evoked a marked induction of interferon-induced genes accompanied by repression of cell-cycle regulated genes, including those encoding ribosomal proteins. Remarkably, patients not responding to AZT–IFNα differed most from responding patients in lower expression of these same IFN-responsive genes, as well as components of the antigen processing and presentation apparatus. Demonstration of specific gene expression signatures associated with response to AZT–IFNα therapy may provide novel insights into the mechanisms of action in ATLL.
- 7 April 2010
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Leukemia & Lymphoma
- Vol. 51 (7) , 1200-1216
Expression profiles of adult T-cell leukemia–lymphoma and associations with clinical responses to zidovudine and interferon α
Adult T-cell leukemia–lymphoma (ATLL) is an HTLV-1-associated lymphoproliferative malignancy that is frequently fatal. We compared gene expression profiles (GEPs) of leukemic specimens from nine patients with ATLL at the time of diagnosis and immediately after combination therapy with zidovudine (AZT) and interferon α (IFNα). GEPs were also related to genetic aberrations determined by comparative genomic hybridization. We identified several genes anomalously over-expressed in the ATLL leukemic cells at the mRNA level, including LYN, CSPG2, and LMO2, and confirmed LMO2 expression in ATLL cells at the protein level. In vivo AZT–IFNα therapy evoked a marked induction of interferon-induced genes accompanied by repression of cell-cycle regulated genes, including those encoding ribosomal proteins. Remarkably, patients not responding to AZT–IFNα differed most from responding patients in lower expression of these same IFN-responsive genes, as well as components of the antigen processing and presentation apparatus. Demonstration of specific gene expression signatures associated with response to AZT–IFNα therapy may provide novel insights into the mechanisms of action in ATLL.
- Open Access
- 16 April 2009
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood
- Vol. 113 (16) , 3754-3764
Differentiation stage–specific expression of microRNAs in B lymphocytes and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas
MiRNAs are small RNA molecules binding to partially complementary sites in the 3′-UTR of target transcripts and repressing their expression. miRNAs orchestrate multiple cellular functions and play critical roles in cell differentiation and cancer development. We analyzed miRNA profiles in B-cell subsets during peripheral B-cell differentiation as well as in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cells. Our results show temporal changes in the miRNA expression during B-cell differentiation with a highly unique miRNA profile in germinal center (GC) lymphocytes. We provide experimental evidence that these changes may be physiologically relevant by demonstrating that GC-enriched hsa-miR-125b down-regulates the expression of IRF4 and PRDM1/BLIMP1, and memory B cell–enriched hsa-miR-223 down-regulates the expression of LMO2. We further demonstrate that although an important component of the biology of a malignant cell is inherited from its nontransformed cellular progenitor—GC centroblasts—aberrant miRNA expression is acquired upon cell transformation. A 9-miRNA signature was identified that could precisely differentiate the 2 major subtypes of DLBCL. Finally, expression of some of the miRNAs in this signature is correlated with clinical outcome of uniformly treated DLBCL patients.
- 16 April 2009
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood
- Vol. 113 (16) , 3754-3764
Open AccessDifferentiation stage–specific expression of microRNAs in B lymphocytes and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas
MiRNAs are small RNA molecules binding to partially complementary sites in the 3′-UTR of target transcripts and repressing their expression. miRNAs orchestrate multiple cellular functions and play critical roles in cell differentiation and cancer development. We analyzed miRNA profiles in B-cell subsets during peripheral B-cell differentiation as well as in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) cells. Our results show temporal changes in the miRNA expression during B-cell differentiation with a highly unique miRNA profile in germinal center (GC) lymphocytes. We provide experimental evidence that these changes may be physiologically relevant by demonstrating that GC-enriched hsa-miR-125b down-regulates the expression of IRF4 and PRDM1/BLIMP1, and memory B cell–enriched hsa-miR-223 down-regulates the expression of LMO2. We further demonstrate that although an important component of the biology of a malignant cell is inherited from its nontransformed cellular progenitor—GC centroblasts—aberrant miRNA expression is acquired upon cell transformation. A 9-miRNA signature was identified that could precisely differentiate the 2 major subtypes of DLBCL. Finally, expression of some of the miRNAs in this signature is correlated with clinical outcome of uniformly treated DLBCL patients.
- Open Access
- 1 February 2009
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 131 (2) , 264-278
The Transcription Factor LMO2 Is a Robust Marker of Vascular Endothelium and Vascular Neoplasms and Selected Other Entities
The transcription factor LMO2 is involved in vascular and hematopoietic development and hematolymphoid neoplasia. We have demonstrated that LMO2 is expressed nearly ubiquitously in native and neoplastic vasculature, including lymphatics. LMO2 reactivity is otherwise virtually absent in nonhematolymphoid tissues except in breast myoepithelium, prostatic basal cells, and secretory phase endometrial glands. Vasculature is LMO2– in adult and fetal heart, brain of older adults, hepatic sinusoids, and hepatocellular carcinoma. LMO2 is uniformly expressed in benign vascular and lymphatic neoplasms and in most malignant vascular neoplasms with the exception of epithelioid vascular neoplasms of pleura and bone. Among nonvascular neoplasms, LMO2 reactivity is present in giant cell tumor of tendon sheath, juvenile xanthogranuloma, a subset of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, small round blue cell tumors, and myoepithelial-derived neoplasms. The restricted expression pattern, nuclear localization, and crisp staining of LMO2 in paraffin blocks make it an attractive candidate for the diagnostic immunohistochemistry laboratory.
- 1 February 2009
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 131 (2) , 264-278
Open AccessThe Transcription Factor LMO2 Is a Robust Marker of Vascular Endothelium and Vascular Neoplasms and Selected Other Entities
The transcription factor LMO2 is involved in vascular and hematopoietic development and hematolymphoid neoplasia. We have demonstrated that LMO2 is expressed nearly ubiquitously in native and neoplastic vasculature, including lymphatics. LMO2 reactivity is otherwise virtually absent in nonhematolymphoid tissues except in breast myoepithelium, prostatic basal cells, and secretory phase endometrial glands. Vasculature is LMO2– in adult and fetal heart, brain of older adults, hepatic sinusoids, and hepatocellular carcinoma. LMO2 is uniformly expressed in benign vascular and lymphatic neoplasms and in most malignant vascular neoplasms with the exception of epithelioid vascular neoplasms of pleura and bone. Among nonvascular neoplasms, LMO2 reactivity is present in giant cell tumor of tendon sheath, juvenile xanthogranuloma, a subset of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, small round blue cell tumors, and myoepithelial-derived neoplasms. The restricted expression pattern, nuclear localization, and crisp staining of LMO2 in paraffin blocks make it an attractive candidate for the diagnostic immunohistochemistry laboratory.
- 28 December 2007
- Published by Wiley in Archiv der Pharmazie
- Vol. 341 (1) , 28-41
Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 2,4,6-Functionalized Derivatives of Pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidines as Cytotoxic Agents and Apoptosis Inducers
In the search for new derivatives with anticancer activity that are able to induce a selective pro-apoptotic mechanism in cancer cells, we have designed, synthesized, and evaluated a series of new 2-(alkylsulfanyl)-N-alkylpyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine-4-amine derivatives as cytotoxic and apoptosis inducers. The potential antitumor activity of the compounds was evaluated in vitro by examining their cytotoxic effects against human breast, colon, and bladder cancer-cell lines. The IC50 values of the compounds that showed cytotoxic activity were calculated. The cytotoxic compounds were then tested for their ability to induce caspase-3 activation and nuclear-chromatin degradation. Some compounds, such as 6c, 6d, 6e, 6j, 6o, and 6p, show significant in-vitro cytotoxicity in at least two of the three tested cell lines, induced apoptosis, and also produced a rapid dose-dependent increase in the caspase-3 level in some of the cell lines tested. In order to test the selectivity of the compounds, two non-tumoral human cell lines were used. Several compounds of the did not show cytotoxicity in these cell lines.
- 28 December 2007
- Published by Wiley in Archiv der Pharmazie
- Vol. 341 (1) , 28-41
Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 2,4,6-Functionalized Derivatives of Pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidines as Cytotoxic Agents and Apoptosis Inducers
In the search for new derivatives with anticancer activity that are able to induce a selective pro-apoptotic mechanism in cancer cells, we have designed, synthesized, and evaluated a series of new 2-(alkylsulfanyl)-N-alkylpyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine-4-amine derivatives as cytotoxic and apoptosis inducers. The potential antitumor activity of the compounds was evaluated in vitro by examining their cytotoxic effects against human breast, colon, and bladder cancer-cell lines. The IC50 values of the compounds that showed cytotoxic activity were calculated. The cytotoxic compounds were then tested for their ability to induce caspase-3 activation and nuclear-chromatin degradation. Some compounds, such as 6c, 6d, 6e, 6j, 6o, and 6p, show significant in-vitro cytotoxicity in at least two of the three tested cell lines, induced apoptosis, and also produced a rapid dose-dependent increase in the caspase-3 level in some of the cell lines tested. In order to test the selectivity of the compounds, two non-tumoral human cell lines were used. Several compounds of the did not show cytotoxicity in these cell lines.
- Open Access
- 15 December 2007
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood
- Vol. 110 (13) , 4268-4277
HGAL, a lymphoma prognostic biomarker, interacts with the cytoskeleton and mediates the effects of IL-6 on cell migration
HGAL is a newly identified germinal center (GC)–specific gene whose expression by the tumor cells correlates with a favorable prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell and classical Hodgkin lymphomas. The function of HGAL is unknown. Previous studies demonstrated that HGAL is dispensable for GC formation, immunoglobulin gene class-switch recombination, and somatic hypermutation. Herein, we identify a role for HGAL in the regulation of cell motility. We demonstrate that IL-6 induces the phosphorylation of the C-terminal tyrosine residue of the HGAL protein via the Lyn kinase, and promotes its relocalization from the cytoplasm to podosome-like structures. Further, IL-6–induced HGAL phosphorylation increases its interaction with myosin II and is associated with inhibition of cell migration. Knockdown of endogenous HGAL ameliorates IL-6–induced inhibition of cell migration, whereas overexpression of HGAL imparts inhibitory effects of IL-6 on cell migration. Taken together, our results suggest that HGAL is involved in negative regulation of lymphocyte migration, thus constraining lymphocytes to the GC. Inhibition of lymphocyte migration might contribute to the less aggressive clinical behavior of HGAL-expressing lymphomas.
- 15 December 2007
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood
- Vol. 110 (13) , 4268-4277
Open AccessHGAL, a lymphoma prognostic biomarker, interacts with the cytoskeleton and mediates the effects of IL-6 on cell migration
HGAL is a newly identified germinal center (GC)–specific gene whose expression by the tumor cells correlates with a favorable prognosis in patients with diffuse large B-cell and classical Hodgkin lymphomas. The function of HGAL is unknown. Previous studies demonstrated that HGAL is dispensable for GC formation, immunoglobulin gene class-switch recombination, and somatic hypermutation. Herein, we identify a role for HGAL in the regulation of cell motility. We demonstrate that IL-6 induces the phosphorylation of the C-terminal tyrosine residue of the HGAL protein via the Lyn kinase, and promotes its relocalization from the cytoplasm to podosome-like structures. Further, IL-6–induced HGAL phosphorylation increases its interaction with myosin II and is associated with inhibition of cell migration. Knockdown of endogenous HGAL ameliorates IL-6–induced inhibition of cell migration, whereas overexpression of HGAL imparts inhibitory effects of IL-6 on cell migration. Taken together, our results suggest that HGAL is involved in negative regulation of lymphocyte migration, thus constraining lymphocytes to the GC. Inhibition of lymphocyte migration might contribute to the less aggressive clinical behavior of HGAL-expressing lymphomas.