Tingwen Li
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Tingwen Li has a total of 57 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Dana Grecov
6 shared publicationsKonstantin Pougatch
6 shared publicationsMehrdad Shahnam
National Energy Technology Laboratory, Morgantown, West Virginia 26507, United States
6 shared publicationsChris Guenther
National Energy Technology Laboratory, Morgantown, West Virginia 26507, United States
5 shared publicationsMartha Salcudean
5 shared publicationsJean-François Dietiker
4 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 1 February 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Chemical Engineering Science
- Vol. 195, 356-366
Numerical and experimental comparison of tracer particle and averaging techniques for particle velocities in a fluidized bed
- 1 February 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Chemical Engineering Science
- Vol. 195, 356-366
Numerical and experimental comparison of tracer particle and averaging techniques for particle velocities in a fluidized bed
- Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Chemical Engineering Science
- Vol. 184, 33-51
Development and validation of an enhanced filtered drag model for simulating gas-solid fluidization of Geldart A particles in all flow regimes
- 1 July 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Chemical Engineering Science
- Vol. 184, 33-51
Top Cited PapersDevelopment and validation of an enhanced filtered drag model for simulating gas-solid fluidization of Geldart A particles in all flow regimes
- 1 November 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Powder Technology
- Vol. 301, 1130-1143
Investigation of CO2 capture using solid sorbents in a fluidized bed reactor: Cold flow hydrodynamics
- 1 November 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Powder Technology
- Vol. 301, 1130-1143
Investigation of CO2 capture using solid sorbents in a fluidized bed reactor: Cold flow hydrodynamics
- 10 October 2016
- Published by Wiley in AIChE Journal
- Vol. 63 (4) , 1203-1212
An approach for drag correction based on the local heterogeneity for gas–solid flows
The drag models typically used for gas–solids interaction are mainly developed based on homogeneous systems of flow passing fixed particle assembly. It has been shown that the heterogeneous structures, i.e., clusters and bubbles in fluidized beds, need to be resolved to account for their effect in the numerical simulations. Since the heterogeneity is essentially captured through the local concentration gradient in the computational cells, this study proposes a simple approach to account for the non‐uniformity of solids spatial distribution inside a computational cell and its effect on the interaction between gas and solid phases. To validate this approach, the predicted drag coefficient has been compared to the results from direct numerical simulations. In addition, the need to account for this type of heterogeneity is discussed for a periodic riser flow simulation with highly resolved numerical grids and the impact of the proposed correction for drag is demonstrated. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 63: 1203–1212, 2017
- 10 October 2016
- Published by Wiley in AIChE Journal
- Vol. 63 (4) , 1203-1212
An approach for drag correction based on the local heterogeneity for gas–solid flows
The drag models typically used for gas–solids interaction are mainly developed based on homogeneous systems of flow passing fixed particle assembly. It has been shown that the heterogeneous structures, i.e., clusters and bubbles in fluidized beds, need to be resolved to account for their effect in the numerical simulations. Since the heterogeneity is essentially captured through the local concentration gradient in the computational cells, this study proposes a simple approach to account for the non‐uniformity of solids spatial distribution inside a computational cell and its effect on the interaction between gas and solid phases. To validate this approach, the predicted drag coefficient has been compared to the results from direct numerical simulations. In addition, the need to account for this type of heterogeneity is discussed for a periodic riser flow simulation with highly resolved numerical grids and the impact of the proposed correction for drag is demonstrated. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 63: 1203–1212, 2017
- 1 April 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Particuology
- Vol. 25, 10-22
Investigation of particle–wall interaction in a pseudo-2D fluidized bed using CFD-DEM simulations
- 1 April 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Particuology
- Vol. 25, 10-22
Investigation of particle–wall interaction in a pseudo-2D fluidized bed using CFD-DEM simulations
- 1 December 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Powder Technology
- Vol. 286, 817-827
Validation of a 2.5D CFD model for cylindrical gas–solids fluidized beds
- 1 December 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Powder Technology
- Vol. 286, 817-827
Validation of a 2.5D CFD model for cylindrical gas–solids fluidized beds
- 21 November 2013
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Energy & Fuels
- Vol. 27 (12) , 7896-7904
Computational Fluid Dynamic Simulations of a Pilot-Scale Transport Coal Gasifier: Evaluation of Reaction Kinetics
- 21 November 2013
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Energy & Fuels
- Vol. 27 (12) , 7896-7904
Computational Fluid Dynamic Simulations of a Pilot-Scale Transport Coal Gasifier: Evaluation of Reaction Kinetics
- 28 May 2013
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Vol. 52 (33) , 11424-11435
Validation and Uncertainty Quantification of a Multiphase Computational Fluid Dynamics Model
- 28 May 2013
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
- Vol. 52 (33) , 11424-11435
Validation and Uncertainty Quantification of a Multiphase Computational Fluid Dynamics Model
- 29 April 2013
- Published by Wiley in AIChE Journal
- Vol. 59 (10) , 3624-3632
Evaluation of wall boundary condition parameters for gas–solids fluidized bed simulations
Wall boundary conditions for the solids phase have significant effects on numerical predictions of various gas–solids fluidized beds. Several models for the granular flow wall boundary condition are available in the open literature for numerical modeling of gas–solids flow. A model for specularity coefficient used in Johnson and Jackson boundary conditions by Li and Benyahia (Li and Benyahia, AIChE J. 2012;58:2058–2068) is implemented in the open‐source CFD code‐MFIX. The variable specularity coefficient model provides a physical way to calculate the specularity coefficient needed by the partial‐slip boundary conditions for the solids phase. Through a series of two‐dimensional numerical simulations of bubbling fluidized bed and circulating fluidized bed riser, the model predicts qualitatively consistent trends to the previous studies. Furthermore, a quantitative comparison is conducted between numerical results of variable and constant specularity coefficients to investigate the effect of spatial and temporal variations in specularity coefficient. Published 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 59: 3624–3632, 2013
- 29 April 2013
- Published by Wiley in AIChE Journal
- Vol. 59 (10) , 3624-3632
Evaluation of wall boundary condition parameters for gas–solids fluidized bed simulations
Wall boundary conditions for the solids phase have significant effects on numerical predictions of various gas–solids fluidized beds. Several models for the granular flow wall boundary condition are available in the open literature for numerical modeling of gas–solids flow. A model for specularity coefficient used in Johnson and Jackson boundary conditions by Li and Benyahia (Li and Benyahia, AIChE J. 2012;58:2058–2068) is implemented in the open‐source CFD code‐MFIX. The variable specularity coefficient model provides a physical way to calculate the specularity coefficient needed by the partial‐slip boundary conditions for the solids phase. Through a series of two‐dimensional numerical simulations of bubbling fluidized bed and circulating fluidized bed riser, the model predicts qualitatively consistent trends to the previous studies. Furthermore, a quantitative comparison is conducted between numerical results of variable and constant specularity coefficients to investigate the effect of spatial and temporal variations in specularity coefficient. Published 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 59: 3624–3632, 2013