Martin Afan John Parry

The Rubisco enzyme represents a significant amount of leaf nitrogen, which in turn requires the application of high amounts of nitrogen fertilizer to sustain plant growth and yield. This has both cost and environmental implications, and approaches to reductions nitrogen fertilizer application are desirable. In this study, the level of Rubisco protein was reduced in wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Cadenza) using RNA interference (RNAi) to test the hypothesis that photosynthesis, growth, and grain yield could be maintained whilst improving nitrogen use efficiency. The RNAi Rubisco wheat plants, with a Rubisco activity of less than 70% of wild type (WT) plant levels, had reduced photosynthesis, reductions in leaf and stem biomass, and decreased seed yield. Interestingly, in the wheat RNAi Rubisco lines that had a small (<30%) reduction in Rubisco activity, the seed number per ear, total seed weight, and harvest index were comparable to those of WT plants. However, no improvement in photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency was evident in any of the RNAi Rubisco lines. Notably, photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency was lower than for WT wheat plants in the RNAi lines that had more than a 30% reduction in Rubisco activity. This result was unexpected and caused by an accumulation of N in both the leaves and the seeds. At present we do not have an explanation for this, but one possible hypothesis is that it could be due to slower growth caused by a reduction in source strength in the RNAi plants, which in turn resulted in changes to carbon and nitrogen allocation.

In this study, the level of Rubisco protein was reduced in wheat using RNAi, to test the hypothesis that photosynthesis, growth, and grain yield could be maintained whilst improving nitrogen use efficiency. The RNAi Rubisco wheat plants, with a Rubisco activity of less than 70% of wild type (WT) plant levels, had reduced photosynthesis, reductions in leaf and stem biomass and decreased seed yield. Interestingly, in the wheat RNAi Rubisco lines that had a small (<30%) reduction in Rubisco activity, the seed number, total seed weight and harvest index were comparable to that of WT type plants. However, no improvement in photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency (PNUE) was evident in any of the RNAi Rubisco lines. Notably, PNUE was lower than for WT wheat plants in the RNAi lines with more than a 30% reduction in Rubisco activity. This result was unexpected and caused by an accumulation of N in both the leaves and seeds. At present we do not have an explanation for this but one possible hypothesis is that it could be due to slower growth caused by a reduction in source strength in the RNAi plants, which in turn resulted in changes to carbon and nitrogen allocation. Highlight: Wheat RNAi plants with small reductions in the amount and activity of Rubisco had a similar biomass and total seed weight to that of untransformed controls but no improvement in nitrogen use efficiency was evident.

To meet the increasing global demand for food, feed, fibre and other plant‐derived products, a steep increase in crop productivity is a scientifically and technically challenging imperative. The CropBooster‐P project, a response to the H2020 call ‘Future proofing our plants’, is developing a roadmap for plant research to improve crops critical for the future of European agriculture by increasing crop yield, nutritional quality, value for non‐food applications and sustainability. However, if we want to efficiently improve crop production in Europe and prioritize methods for crop trait improvement in the coming years, we need to take into account future socio‐economic, technological and global developments, including numerous policy and socio‐economic challenges and constraints. Based on a wide range of possible global trends and key uncertainties, we developed four extreme future learning scenarios that depict complementary future developments. Here, we elaborate on how the scenarios could inform and direct future plant research, and we aim to highlight the crop improvement approaches that could be the most promising or appropriate within each of these four future world scenarios. Moreover, we discuss some key plant technology options that would need to be developed further to meet the needs of multiple future learning scenarios, such as improving methods for breeding and genetic engineering. In addition, other diverse platforms of food production may offer unrealized potential, such as underutilized terrestrial and aquatic species as alternative sources of nutrition and biomass production. We demonstrate that although several methods or traits could facilitate a more efficient crop production system in some of the scenarios, others may offer great potential in all four of the future learning scenarios. Altogether, this indicates that depending on which future we are heading toward, distinct plant research fields should be given priority if we are to meet our food, feed and non‐food biomass production needs in the coming decades.

The growing world population and global increases in the standard of living both result in an increasing demand for food, feed and other plant‐derived products. In the coming years, plant‐based research will be among the major drivers ensuring food security and the expansion of the bio‐based economy. Crop productivity is determined by several factors, including the available physical and agricultural resources, crop management, and the resource use efficiency, quality and intrinsic yield potential of the chosen crop. This review focuses on intrinsic yield potential, since understanding its determinants and their biological basis will allow to maximize the plant's potential in food and energy production. Yield potential is determined by a variety of complex traits that integrate strictly regulated processes and their underlying gene regulatory networks. Due to this inherent complexity, numerous potential targets have been identified that could be exploited to increase crop yield. These encompass diverse metabolic and physical processes at the cellular, organ and canopy level. We present an overview of some of the distinct biological processes considered to be crucial for yield determination that could further be exploited to improve future crop productivity.

The world needs more than double its current agricultural productivity by 2050 to produce enough food and feed, as well as to provide feedstock for the bioeconomy. These future increases will not only need to be sustainable but without comprommising the nutritional quality, and ideally also need to decrease greenhouse gas emissions and increase carbon sequestration to help mitigate the consequences of global climate change. These challenges could be tackled by developing and integrating new future‐proof crops into our food system. The H2020 CropBooster‐P project sets out plant‐centered breeding approaches guided by a broad socio‐economic and societal support. First, the potential approaches for breeding crops with sustainably increased yields adapted to the future climate of Europe are identified. These crop‐breeding options are subsequently prioritized and their adoption considered by experts across the agri‐food system and the wider public, taking into account environmental, economic and other technical criteria. In this way, a specific research agenda to future‐proof our crops was developed, supported by an eventual implementation plan.