Jennifer C. Taylor

The study of food consumption, diet, and related concepts is motivated by diverse goals, including understanding why food consumption impacts our health, and why we eat the foods we do. These varied motivations can make it challenging to define and measure consumption, as it can be specified across nearly infinite dimensions—from micronutrients to carbon footprint to food preparation. This challenge is amplified by the dynamic nature of food consumption processes, with the underlying phenomena of interest often based on the nature of repeated interactions with food occurring over time. This complexity underscores a need to not only improve how we measure food consumption but is also a call to support theoreticians in better specifying what, how, and why food consumption occurs as part of processes, as a prerequisite step to rigorous measurement. The purpose of this Perspective article is to offer a framework, the consumption process framework, as a tool that researchers in a theoretician role can use to support these more robust definitions of consumption processes. In doing so, the framework invites theoreticians to be a bridge between practitioners who wish to measure various aspects of food consumption and methodologists who can develop measurement protocols and technologies that can support measurement when consumption processes are clearly defined. In the paper we justify the need for such a framework, introduce the consumption process framework, illustrate the framework via a use case, and discuss existing technologies that enable the use of this framework and, by extension, more rigorous study of consumption. This consumption process framework demonstrates how theoreticians could fundamentally shift how food consumption is defined and measured towards more rigorous study of what, how, and why food is eaten as part of dynamic processes and a deeper understanding of linkages between behavior, food, and health.

Introduction: Horticulture interventions in developing countries are most effective in improving micronutrient malnutrition when combined with nutrition education, although there have been few studies assessing their long term impact. In 2017, a peer-led nutrition education and horticulture intervention was implemented in a women’s group in Eastern Kenya which focused on

Objective: School-based interventions and policies encourage youths to include and consume fruits and vegetables at lunchtime via school lunches, but limited research has examined how these behaviours compare when youths have home-packed lunches. The objective of the present study was to compare fruit and vegetable contents and consumption among students having school or home-packed lunches over the school week.Design: Participants were observed over five consecutive days at school lunchtime. Trained analysts estimated students’ lunchtime fruit and vegetable contents and consumption using digital imaging. Mixed models examined associations between fruit and vegetable dietary behaviours and lunch source (school v. home-packed), controlling for student gender, grade and school.Setting: Three elementary schools in northern California, USA.Participants: Fourth-, fifth- and sixth-grade students (n_children 315; n_observations 1421).Results: Students were significantly less likely to have and to consume fruits and vegetables (all PP<0·05) but no differences for other dietary outcomes.Conclusions: The study adds to a growing body of literature indicating shortfalls in fruit and vegetable contents and consumption associated with having a home-packed lunch, relative to having a school lunch. Findings suggest that school-based interventions, particularly when targeting home-packed lunches, should focus on whether or not these foods are included and consumed, with less emphasis on quantities.

This pilot study evaluated the impact of a school-based intervention integrating garden-enhanced nutrition education, family and community partnerships, and improvements to school fruit and vegetable availability. Two elementary schools in Northern California were randomly assigned to control and intervention. Changes in lunchtime fruit and vegetable intake as well as changes in fruit and vegetable availability were compared between schools, with dietary outcomes assessed among fourth-grade students having complete fruit (n = 111) and vegetable (n = 112) intake data. There were greater increases in vegetable consumption, produce expenditures, and vegetable variety at the intervention than control school (p < 0.01) but no differences for fruit outcomes. The complementary nature of program components illustrates how the promotion of vegetables available at school meals can be connected to garden-enhanced nutrition education.

INTRODUCTION: General practitioners (GPs) have the potential to promote alcohol harm minimisation via discussion of alcohol use with patients, but knowledge of GPs’ current practice and attitudes on this matter is limited. Our aim was to assess GPs’ current practice and attitudes towards discussing alcohol use with their patients. METHODS: This qualitative study involved semi-structured, face-to-face interviews with 19 GPs by a group of medical students in primary care practices in Wellington, New Zealand. FINDINGS: Despite agreement amongst GPs about the importance of their role in alcohol harm minimisation, alcohol was not often raised in patient consultations. GPs’ usual practice included referral to drug and alcohol services and advice. GPs were also aware of national drinking guidelines and alcohol screening tools, but in practice these were rarely utilised. Key barriers to discussing alcohol use included its societal ‘taboo’ nature, time constraints, and perceptions of patient dishonesty. CONCLUSION: In this study there is a fundamental mismatch between the health community’s expectations of GPs to discuss alcohol with patients and the reality. Potential solutions to the most commonly identified barriers include screening outside the GP consultation, incorporating screening tools into existing software used by GPs, exploring with GPs the social stigma associated with alcohol misuse, and framing alcohol misuse as a health issue. As it is unclear if these approaches will change GP practice, there remains scope for the development and pilot testing of potential solutions identified in this research, together with an assessment of their efficacy in reducing hazardous alcohol consumption. KEYWORDS: Primary health care; general practice; alcohol drinking; alcohol-related disorders, attitude of health personnel