Sebastien Villard

Numerous studies have been carried out on the potential effects of an extremely low frequency (ELF—0–300 Hz) magnetic field (MF) on human health. However, there is limited data on the effect of a high exposure level to ELF MFs for a prolonged period. Therefore, the objective of this pilot work was to demonstrate the feasibility of a study evaluating the stress hormone concentrations resulting from a 10‐min exposure to a 60 Hz MF of several tens of thousands of µT. In this pilot study, human volunteers were thus exposed for the first time to a 60 Hz, 50 mT MF for a duration of 10 min. Stress hormone levels were measured before (once), during (twice) and after (once) this 10‐min exposure period. The small sample size (n = 5) did not allow to conduct standard inferential statistical tests and no conclusion regarding the exposure effects can be drawn. However, this study demonstrates the feasibility of using a simple blood testing material in a protocol testing for the effect of a 10‐min exposure to a high MF level in healthy human volunteers. © 2022 Bioelectromagnetics Society.

Electric fields from both extremely low‐frequency magnetic fields (ELF‐MF) and alternating current (AC) stimulations impact human neurophysiology. As the retinal photoreceptors, vestibular hair cells are graded potential cells and are sensitive to electric fields. Electrophosphene and magnetophosphene literature suggests different impacts of AC and ELF‐MF on the vestibular hair cells. Furthermore, while AC modulates the vestibular system more globally, lateral ELF‐MF stimulations could be more utricular specific. Therefore, to further address the impact of ELF‐MF‐induced electric fields on the human vestibular system and the potential differences with AC stimulations, we investigated the effects of both stimulation modalities on the perception of verticality using a subjective visual vertical (SVV) paradigm. For similar levels of SVV precision, the ELF‐MF condition required more time to adjust SVV, and SVV variability was higher with ELF‐MF than with AC vestibular‐specific stimulations. Yet, the differences between AC and ELF‐MF stimulations were small. Overall, this study highlights small differences between AC and ELF‐MF vestibular stimulations, underlines a potential utricular contribution, and has implications for international exposure guidelines and standards. © 2022 Bioelectromagnetics Society.

Background: International agencies recognize the lack of knowledge to further establish standards and guidelines to protect the workers and the public from extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (ELF-MF). In that regard, postural control has been proposed as a biomarker of potential adverse effects in humans. Considering its crucial role in postural control and its specific neurophysiological characteristics, the vestibular system emerges as an ELF-MF likely target. However, postural modulation to vestibular ELF-MF exposure remains inconclusive. Previous studies led us to investigate stimulation orientation and point of application to clarify the ELF-MF impact on balance in humans. Objectives: This research aimed to investigate the acute postural impact of lateral vestibular-specific ELF-MF stimulations. Methods: Postural control of thirty eight healthy participants was analyzed with lateral vestibular-specific ELF-MF stimulations ranging from 20 Hz to 160 Hz, up to 142 T/s and vestibular electrical stimulations at the same frequencies. Both spatial orientation and quantity of movement variables were used to investigate postural modulations. Results: Despite a conclusive positive control effect, no significant effects of ELF-MF and alternating current stimulation exposures were found regardless of frequency conditions. Conclusions: Although important electric fields were generated, no postural modulation was found. However, at these frequencies, the potential vestibular activation did not translate into functional postural sway but might be observed with reflexive vestibular outcomes.

Background: International agencies such as the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and the International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety (ICES) of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers need further data to set international guidelines to protect workers and the public from potential adverse effects to Extremely Low-Frequency Magnetic Fields (ELF-MF). Interestingly, electromagnetic induction has been hypothesized to impact human vestibular function (i.e. through induced electric fields). To date, a theoretical 4 T/s vestibular threshold was proposed to modulate postural control, but data is lacking above this limit. Objectives: This research aimed to investigate the impact of full head homogeneous ELF-MF stimulations above the 4 T/s threshold on human postural control. Methods: Postural control of twenty healthy participants was analyzed while full head homogeneous ELF-MF stimulations (20 Hz, 60 Hz, and 90 Hz) up to 40 T/s were applied. Velocity, main direction and spatial dispersion of sway were used to investigate postural modulations. Results: Despite a conclusive positive control effect, no significant effects of ELF-MF exposures on velocity, spatial dispersion, and direction of the postural sway were found for our 3 frequency conditions. Conclusions: The homogeneous full head MF stimulations oriented vertically and delivered at high frequencies induced E-fields having a weaker impact than anticipated, possibly because they impacted only a small portion of the vestibular system. This resulted in an absence of effect on postural control outcomes.

Studies have found that extremely low-frequency (ELF, < 300 Hz) magnetic fields (MF) can modulate standing balance; however, the acute balance effects of high flux densities in this frequency range have not been systematically investigated yet. This study explores acute human standing balance responses of 22 participants exposed to magnetic induction at 50 and 100 mTrms (MF), and to 1.5 mA alternating currents (AC). The center of pressure displacement (COP) was collected and analyzed to investigate postural modulation. The path length, the area, the velocity, the power spectrum in low (< 0.5 Hz) and medium (0.5–2 Hz) bands have computed and showed the expected effect of the positive control direct current (DC) electric stimulation but failed to show any significant effect of the time-varying stimulations (AC and MF). However, we showed a significant biased stabilization effect on postural data from the custom experimental apparatus employed in this work, which might have neutralized the hypothesized results.

Humans are surrounded by sources of daily exposure to power-frequency (60 Hz in North America) magnetic fields (MFs). Such time-varying MFs induce electric fields and currents in living structures which possibly lead to biological effects. The present pilot study examined possible extremely low frequency (ELF) MF effects on human neuromotor control in general, and physiological postural tremor and electroencephalography (EEG) in particular. Since the EEG cortical mu-rhythm (8–12 Hz) from the primary motor cortex and physiological tremor are related, it was hypothesized that a 60 Hz MF exposure focused on this cortical region could acutely modulate human physiological tremor. Ten healthy volunteers (age: 23.8 ± 4 SD) were fitted with a MRI-compatible EEG cap while exposed to 11 MF conditions (60 Hz, 0 to 50 mT_rms, 5 mT_rms increments). Simultaneously, physiological tremor (recorded from the contralateral index finger) and EEG (from associated motor and somatosensory brain regions) were measured. Results showed no significant main effect of MF exposure conditions on any of the analyzed physiological tremor characteristics. In terms of EEG, no significant effects of the MF were observed for C1, C3, C5 and CP1 electrodes. However, a significant main effect was found for CP3 and CP5 electrodes, both suggesting a decreased mu-rhythm spectral power with increasing MF flux density. This is however not confirmed by Bonferroni corrected pairwise comparisons. Considering both EEG and tremor findings, no effect of the MF exposure on human motor control was observed. However, MF exposure had a subtle effect on the mu-rhythm amplitude in the brain region involved in tactile perception. Current findings are to be considered with caution due to the small size of this pilot work, but they provide preliminary insights to international agencies establishing guidelines regarding electromagnetic field exposure with new experimental data acquired in humans exposed to high mT-range MFs.

Although studies have found that extremely low-frequency (ELF, < 300 Hz) magnetic fields (MF) can modulate human standing balance, the acute effects of electromagnetic fields on standing balance have not been systematically investigated. This work aims to establish the threshold for acute standing balance modulation during ELFMF exposure. One hundred volunteers will be exposed to transcranial electric stimulations (Direct Current - DC and Alternating Current - AC, 1 mA) and ELFMF (0 to 160 Hz, 0 to 100 mT). The displacement of their center of pressure will be collected and analyzed as an indicator of vestibular performance. During pilot testing (n=6), we found increased lateral sway with DC, and to a lesser extent, AC exposure. The ELFMF exposure system still needs to be adapted to allow meaningful results. Future protocol design will test for possible effects due to exposures in the radiofrequency range (i.e. above 3 kHz). These results will contribute to the literature documenting exposure guidelines aiming to protect workers and the general public.

The control of stance is influenced by activities that are engaged in during stance. We investigated simultaneous constraints imposed by individual-specific factors (such as the distance of visual targets) and of interpersonal factors arising from dyadic conversation. Each member of participant pairs looked at targets (drawings) that were similar to, but differed from, that of a conversational partner. Conversational partners conversed to identify the differing elements. In Experiments 1 and 2, members of each dyad conversed with each other or separately conversed with a confederate (an experimenter). We varied the distance of targets (Experiment 1) and their size (Experiment 2). In Experiment 3, target size could be the same for both members of a dyad (i.e., small-small, large-large) or could differ (i.e., small-large, large-small). Interpersonal postural coordination was stronger when members of dyads conversed with each other, replicating earlier studies, but this manipulation also influenced parameters of individual sway. In Experiment 3, interpersonal postural coordination also was influenced by variation in the size of the partner's target. Analysis of the sway of individuals revealed influences of target distance and size, replicating previous effects; however, these manipulations also influenced interpersonal postural coordination. Overall, the results indicate that postural activity was modulated simultaneously with respect to individual and dyadic parameters of the task situation. We argue that it may be useful, both theoretically and empirically, to interpret the effects of conversation on postural activity within the broader context of relations between postural control and the performance of suprapostural tasks.