MGMatthias Griebel

Matthias Griebel

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Matthias Griebel has a total of 36 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Deep learning-enabled segmentation of ambiguous bioimages with deepflash2

    by Matthias Griebel, Dennis Segebarth, Nikolai Stein, Nina Schukraft, Philip Tovote, Robert Blum, Christoph M. Flath

    Bioimages frequently exhibit low signal-to-noise ratios due to experimental conditions, specimen characteristics, and imaging trade-offs. Reliable segmentation of such ambiguous images is difficult and laborious. Here we introduce deepflash2, a deep learning-enabled segmentation tool for bioimage analysis. The tool addresses typical challenges that may arise during the training, evaluation, and application of deep learning models on ambiguous data. The tool’s training and evaluation pipeline uses multiple expert annotations and deep model ensembles to achieve accurate results. The application pipeline supports various use-cases for expert annotations and includes a quality assurance mechanism in the form of uncertainty measures. Benchmarked against other tools, deepflash2 offers both high predictive accuracy and efficient computational resource usage. The tool is built upon established deep learning libraries and enables sharing of trained model ensembles with the research community. deepflash2 aims to simplify the integration of deep learning into bioimage analysis projects while improving accuracy and reliability.


  • Open Access

    On the objectivity, reliability, and validity of deep learning enabled bioimage analyses

    by Dennis Segebarth, Matthias Griebel, Nikolai Stein, Cora R von Collenberg, Corinna Martin, Dominik Fiedler, Lucas B Comeras, Anupam Sah, Victoria Schoeffler, Teresa Lüffe, et al.

    Bioimage analysis of fluorescent labels is widely used in the life sciences. Recent advances in deep learning (DL) allow automating time-consuming manual image analysis processes based on annotated training data. However, manual annotation of fluorescent features with a low signal-to-noise ratio is somewhat subjective. Training DL models on subjective annotations may be instable or yield biased models. In turn, these models may be unable to reliably detect biological effects. An analysis pipeline integrating data annotation, ground truth estimation, and model training can mitigate this risk. To evaluate this integrated process, we compared different DL-based analysis approaches. With data from two model organisms (mice, zebrafish) and five laboratories, we show that ground truth estimation from multiple human annotators helps to establish objectivity in fluorescent feature annotations. Furthermore, ensembles of multiple models trained on the estimated ground truth establish reliability and validity. Our research provides guidelines for reproducible DL-based bioimage analyses.


  • Open Access

    On the objectivity, reliability, and validity of deep learning enabled bioimage analyses

    by Dennis Segebarth, Matthias Griebel, Nikolai Stein, Cora R. von Collenberg, Corinna Martin, Dominik Fiedler, Lucas B. Comeras, Anupam Sah, Victoria Schoeffler, Theresa Lüffe, et al.

    Fluorescent labeling of biomolecules is widely used for bioimage analyses throughout the life sciences. Recent advances in deep learning (DL) have opened new possibilities to scale the image analysis processes through automation. However, the annotation of fluorescent features with a low signal-to-noise ratio is frequently based on subjective criteria. Training on subjective annotations may ultimately lead to biased DL models yielding irreproducible results. An end-to-end analysis process that integrates data annotation, ground truth estimation, and model training can mitigate this risk. To highlight the importance of this integrated process, we compare different DL-based analysis approaches. Based on data from different laboratories, we show that ground truth estimation from multiple human annotators is indispensable to establish objectivity in fluorescent feature annotations. We demonstrate that ensembles of multiple models trained on the estimated ground truth establish reliability and validity. Our research provides guidelines for reproducible and transparent bioimage analyses using DL methods.


  • A hidden Markov model for distinguishing between RFID-tagged objects in adjacent areas

    by Matthias Hauser, Matthias Griebel, Frederic Thiesse

    Distinguishing between RFID-tagged objects within different areas poses an important building block for many RFID-based applications. Existing localization techniques, however, often cannot reliably distinguish between tagged objects that are close to the border of adjacent areas. Against this backdrop, we present a hybrid approach based on an ANN and a HMM that leverages not only low-level RFID data streams but also information about physical constraints and process knowledge and thus incorporates scene dynamics. We experimentally demonstrate the performance of our approach considering a RFID-based smart fitting room which is a practically relevant application with limited process control in an environment with strong multipath reflections and non-line-of-sight effects. Our results show that our approach is able to reliably distinguish between tagged objects within different cabins. This includes objects hanging on coat hooks at partition walls of adjacent cabins, i.e., at a maximum distance of 5 centimeters to the border of an adjacent area.