Bela Gipp

Recommender systems (RecSys) research depends on extensive empirical evaluation, yet translating experimental designs into executable code remains a manual, error-prone process. This paper presents AutoRecLab, a Python-based autonomous RecSys lab that automates RecSys experimentation from natural-language prompts. Starting from a research idea, AutoRecLab derives explicit experiment requirements, develops and validates a prototype, and iteratively refines it into the requested full experiment by combining retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) documentation lookup, static type verification, and execution-steered tree search. As a demonstration, AutoRecLab autonomously implements an explicit-to-implicit feedback conversion study and, in a baseline comparison across six algorithms and three datasets, achieves 8 out of 9 successful runs at an average cost of approximately $1 per run using GPT-5.4-mini.

Text generation has become more accessible than ever, and the growing interest in these systems, especially those using large language models, has spurred a surge in related publications. We provide a systematic literature review comprising 257 papers, covering the period from January 2017 to December 2025. This review categorizes text generation contributions into five main tasks: open-ended text generation, summarization, translation, paraphrasing, and question answering. For each task in our taxonomy, we review relevant characteristics and key subtasks. We assess current approaches for evaluating text generation systems, covering model-free, model-based, and human evaluation. Our investigation shows several task-specific challenges (e.g., missing datasets for multi-document summarization, lack of coherence in story generation, and difficulties in complex reasoning for question answering). We further discuss nine challenges common to all tasks and sub-tasks in recent text generation papers: bias, reasoning, hallucinations, misuse, privacy, interpretability, transparency, datasets, and computing. This systematic literature review targets two main audiences: early-career researchers in natural language processing seeking an overview of the field and promising research directions, and senior researchers who need a recent overview of the main tasks, evaluation, challenges, and mitigation strategies.

This note reports on the digitisation of scanned reviews from zbMATH volumes 1–529. We describe the procedure, techniques, and achievements, and release the dataset of images, corresponding text, and structured information for the community.

This article provides a comprehensive systematic review of the literature on entity linking using Wikidata as the grounding knowledge base. Our review extends the scope of previous studies from two to eight dimensions of entity linking, which we classify into the following categories: definitions, tasks, types, domains, approaches, datasets, applications, and challenges. We find that datasets primarily address question-answering and news domains but underutilize Wikidata’s capabilities for hyper-relations, multilingualism, and time dependence. The research gaps we identify include the need for more robust datasets, hybrid methods combining rule-based and learning-based approaches, and improved handling of ambiguity, sparse entity types, data noise, and knowledge graph evolution.

Cross-document coreference resolution (CDCR) identifies and links mentions of the same entities and events across related documents, enabling content analysis that aggregates information at the level of discourse participants. However, existing datasets primarily focus on event resolution and employ a narrow definition of coreference, which limits their effectiveness in analyzing diverse and polarized news coverage where wording varies widely. This paper proposes a revised CDCR annotation scheme of the NewsWCL50 dataset, treating coreference chains as discourse elements (DEs) and conceptual units of analysis. The approach accommodates both identity and near-identity relations, e.g., by linking “the caravan” - “asylum seekers” “those contemplating illegal entry”, allowing models to capture lexical diversity and framing variation in media discourse, while maintaining the fine-grained annotation of DEs. We reannotate the NewsWCL50 and a subset of ECB+ using a unified codebook and evaluate the new datasets through lexical diversity metrics and a same-head-lemma baseline. The results show that the reannotated datasets align closely, falling between the original ECB+ and NewsWCL50, thereby supporting balanced and discourseaware CDCR research in the news domain.

Over the past four decades, artificial intelligence (AI) research has flourished at the nexus of academia and industry. However, Big Tech companies have increasingly acquired the edge in computational resources, big data, and talent. So far, it has been largely unclear how many papers the industry funds, how their citation impact compares to non-funded papers, and what drives industry interest. This study fills that gap by quantifying the number of industry-funded papers at 10 top AI conferences (e.g., ICLR, CVPR, AAAI, ACL) and their citation influence. We analyze about 49.8K papers, about 1.8M citations from AI papers to other papers, and about 2.3M citations from other papers to AI papers from 1998-2022 in Scopus. Through seven research questions, we examine the volume and evolution of industry funding in AI research, the citation impact of funded papers, the diversity and temporal range of their citations, and the subfields in which industry predominantly acts. Our findings reveal that industry presence has grown markedly since 2015, from less than 2 percent to more than 11 percent in 2020. Between 2018 and 2022, 12 percent of industry-funded papers achieved high citation rates as measured by the h5-index, compared to 4 percent of non-industry-funded papers and 2 percent of non-funded papers. Top AI conferences engage more with industry-funded research than non-funded research, as measured by our newly proposed metric, the Citation Preference Ratio (CPR). We show that industry-funded research is increasingly insular, citing predominantly other industry-funded papers while referencing fewer non-funded papers. These findings reveal new trends in AI research funding, including a shift towards more industry-funded papers and their growing citation impact, greater insularity of industry-funded work than non-funded work, and a preference of industry-funded research to cite recent work.

Recent trends in NLP utilize knowledge graphs (KGs) to enhance pretrained language models by incorporating additional knowledge from the graph structures to learn domain-specific terminology or relationships between documents that might otherwise be overlooked. This paper explores how SciNCL, a graph-aware neighborhood contrastive learning methodology originally designed for scientific publications, can be applied to the process industry domain, where text logs contain crucial information about daily operations and are often structured as sparse KGs. Our experiments demonstrate that language models fine-tuned with triplets derived from graph embeddings (GE) outperform a state-of-the-art mE5-large text encoder by 9.8-14.3% (5.45-7.96p) on the proprietary process industry text embedding benchmark (PITEB) while having 3 times fewer parameters.