Punitha Periyasamy
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Punitha Periyasamy has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Mohamed Mohamed Yagoub
Department of Geography and Urban Sustainability, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain P.O. Box 15551, United Arab Emirates
2 shared publications Aishah A. Alsereidi
Department of Geography and Urban Sustainability, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain, UAE
1 shared publication- Elfadil Abdalla Mohamed
Artificial Intelligence Research Center (AIRC), College of Engineering and Information Technology, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
1 shared publication Mahalingam Sudalaimuthu
Department of Applied Geology, University of Madras, Chepauk, Chennai, India
1 shared publication- Reem Alameri
Department of Geography and Urban Sustainability, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain, UAE
1 shared publication - Salama Aldarmaki
Department of Geography and Urban Sustainability, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain, UAE
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 17 July 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Natural Hazards
- Vol. 104 (1) , 111-141
Newspapers as a validation proxy for GIS modeling in Fujairah, United Arab Emirates: identifying flood-prone areas
The UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction listed 10 reasons businesses should reduce their disaster exposure, including risk factoring, which cannot be achieved without historical data about hazards, their locations, magnitudes, and frequencies. Substantial hazard data are reported by newspapers, which could add value to disaster management decision making. In this study, a text-mining program extracted keywords related to floods’ geographic location, date, and damages from newspaper analyses of flash floods in Fujairah, UAE, from 2000–2018. The paper describes extracting such information as well as geocoding and validating flood-prone areas generated through geographic information system (GIS) modeling. The generation of flood-prone areas was based on elevation, slope, land use, soil, and geology coupled with topographic wetness index, topographic position index, and curve number. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) produced relative weight for each factor, and GIS map algebra generated flood-prone areas. AHP inclusion helped minimize weight subjectivity among various experts. Of all areas, 85% are considered medium and low flood-prone zones, mainly mountainous areas. However, the 15% that are high/very high are dominated by urban areas in low coastal plains, predisposing them to flash floods. Eighty-four percent of flood events reported by newspapers were in areas rated as high/very high flood-prone zones. In the absence of flood records, newspapers reports can be used as a reference. Policymakers should assess whether flood-prone area models offer accurate analyses. These findings are useful for organizations related to disaster management, urban planning, insurance, archiving, and documentation.
- 17 July 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Natural Hazards
- Vol. 104 (1) , 111-141
Open AccessNewspapers as a validation proxy for GIS modeling in Fujairah, United Arab Emirates: identifying flood-prone areas
The UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction listed 10 reasons businesses should reduce their disaster exposure, including risk factoring, which cannot be achieved without historical data about hazards, their locations, magnitudes, and frequencies. Substantial hazard data are reported by newspapers, which could add value to disaster management decision making. In this study, a text-mining program extracted keywords related to floods’ geographic location, date, and damages from newspaper analyses of flash floods in Fujairah, UAE, from 2000–2018. The paper describes extracting such information as well as geocoding and validating flood-prone areas generated through geographic information system (GIS) modeling. The generation of flood-prone areas was based on elevation, slope, land use, soil, and geology coupled with topographic wetness index, topographic position index, and curve number. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) produced relative weight for each factor, and GIS map algebra generated flood-prone areas. AHP inclusion helped minimize weight subjectivity among various experts. Of all areas, 85% are considered medium and low flood-prone zones, mainly mountainous areas. However, the 15% that are high/very high are dominated by urban areas in low coastal plains, predisposing them to flash floods. Eighty-four percent of flood events reported by newspapers were in areas rated as high/very high flood-prone zones. In the absence of flood records, newspapers reports can be used as a reference. Policymakers should assess whether flood-prone area models offer accurate analyses. These findings are useful for organizations related to disaster management, urban planning, insurance, archiving, and documentation.
- Open Access
- 14 November 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in Geoenvironmental Disasters
- Vol. 5 (1) , 21
Flood vulnerable zones in the rural blocks of Thiruvallur district, South India
- 14 November 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in Geoenvironmental Disasters
- Vol. 5 (1) , 21
Open AccessFlood vulnerable zones in the rural blocks of Thiruvallur district, South India