Jiwoong Jung
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Jiwoong Jung has a total of 41 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ki-Tae Hwang
Department of Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
4 shared publications - Byoung Hyuck Kim
Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2 shared publications - Eun Sook Lee
Center for Breast Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Korea
2 shared publications - In Sil Choi
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2 shared publications - Sohee Oh
Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2 shared publications Bo Kyung Koo
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (South)
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 October 2020
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Vol. 29 (10) , 2038-2047
Influence of Metabolic Syndrome on Risk of Breast Cancer: A Study Analyzing Nationwide Data from Korean National Health Insurance Service
Background: To investigate the influence of metabolic syndrome and its components on the risk of breast cancer. Methods: Retrospective nationwide cohort study analyzing data of 13,377,349 women older than 19 years from Korean National Health Insurance Service was performed. Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate HR and 95% confidence interval (CI) of breast cancer risk. Results: The presence of metabolic syndrome decreased the risk of all breast cancer types in all subjects (HR, 0.954; 95% CI, 0.939–0.970). In women with age ≤50 years, metabolic syndrome decreased the risk of all breast cancer types, with similar findings for all subject groups (HR, 0.915; 95% CI, 0.892–0.939). In women with age >50 years, metabolic syndrome increased the risk of all breast cancer types (HR, 1.146; 95% CI, 1.123–1.170), especially in age groups of more than 55 years. In women with age >50 years, HRs increased as the number of metabolic syndrome components increased, while HRs decreased as the number of metabolic syndrome components increased in women with age ≤50 years. Conclusions: The presence of metabolic syndrome increased the risk of breast cancers in postmenopausal women, but decreased the risk in premenopausal women. Every metabolic syndrome component played similar roles on the risk of breast cancer as metabolic syndrome, and their effects became stronger when the number of components increased. Impact: Metabolic syndrome is associated with the risk of breast cancer having different effect according to age groups.
- 1 October 2020
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
- Vol. 29 (10) , 2038-2047
Influence of Metabolic Syndrome on Risk of Breast Cancer: A Study Analyzing Nationwide Data from Korean National Health Insurance Service
Background: To investigate the influence of metabolic syndrome and its components on the risk of breast cancer. Methods: Retrospective nationwide cohort study analyzing data of 13,377,349 women older than 19 years from Korean National Health Insurance Service was performed. Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate HR and 95% confidence interval (CI) of breast cancer risk. Results: The presence of metabolic syndrome decreased the risk of all breast cancer types in all subjects (HR, 0.954; 95% CI, 0.939–0.970). In women with age ≤50 years, metabolic syndrome decreased the risk of all breast cancer types, with similar findings for all subject groups (HR, 0.915; 95% CI, 0.892–0.939). In women with age >50 years, metabolic syndrome increased the risk of all breast cancer types (HR, 1.146; 95% CI, 1.123–1.170), especially in age groups of more than 55 years. In women with age >50 years, HRs increased as the number of metabolic syndrome components increased, while HRs decreased as the number of metabolic syndrome components increased in women with age ≤50 years. Conclusions: The presence of metabolic syndrome increased the risk of breast cancers in postmenopausal women, but decreased the risk in premenopausal women. Every metabolic syndrome component played similar roles on the risk of breast cancer as metabolic syndrome, and their effects became stronger when the number of components increased. Impact: Metabolic syndrome is associated with the risk of breast cancer having different effect according to age groups.
- Open Access
Validating the ACOSOG Z0011 Trial Result: A Population-Based Study Using the SEER Database
The Z0011 trial demonstrated that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) could be omitted in spite of 1–2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes. This study aimed to validate the results on a population-based database. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was searched for patients comparable to the Z0011 participants. The type of axillary surgery was estimated using the total number of examined axillary lymph nodes (ALNs). Breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) was compared between patients with ≥10 ALNs (the sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) and ALND group, or “SLND + ALND group”) and patients with one or two ALNs (the “SLND group”). During 2010–2015, the SEER database included 7077 and 6620 patients categorized in the SLND group and the SLND + ALND group, respectively. Death was observed for 515 patients (7.3%) in the SLND group and 589 patients (8.9%) in the SLND + ALND group based on a median follow-up of 41 months. After propensity-score matching, the adjusted hazard ratio for BCSM in the SLND group (vs. the SLND + ALND group) was 1.038 (95% confidence interval: 0.798–1.350). Regardless of the SLND criteria, the outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. This retrospective cohort study of Z0011-comparable patients revealed that ALND could be omitted based on the Z0011 strategy, even among patients with ≤2 dissected ALNs.
Open AccessValidating the ACOSOG Z0011 Trial Result: A Population-Based Study Using the SEER Database
The Z0011 trial demonstrated that axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) could be omitted in spite of 1–2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes. This study aimed to validate the results on a population-based database. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was searched for patients comparable to the Z0011 participants. The type of axillary surgery was estimated using the total number of examined axillary lymph nodes (ALNs). Breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) was compared between patients with ≥10 ALNs (the sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) and ALND group, or “SLND + ALND group”) and patients with one or two ALNs (the “SLND group”). During 2010–2015, the SEER database included 7077 and 6620 patients categorized in the SLND group and the SLND + ALND group, respectively. Death was observed for 515 patients (7.3%) in the SLND group and 589 patients (8.9%) in the SLND + ALND group based on a median follow-up of 41 months. After propensity-score matching, the adjusted hazard ratio for BCSM in the SLND group (vs. the SLND + ALND group) was 1.038 (95% confidence interval: 0.798–1.350). Regardless of the SLND criteria, the outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. This retrospective cohort study of Z0011-comparable patients revealed that ALND could be omitted based on the Z0011 strategy, even among patients with ≤2 dissected ALNs.
- Open Access
- 26 June 2019
- Published by Korean Breast Cancer Society in Journal of Breast Disease
- Vol. 7 (1) , 16-22
Clinical Implication of Intraoperative Sonography in Localized Excision Biopsy for Mammographic Microcalcifications
- 26 June 2019
- Published by Korean Breast Cancer Society in Journal of Breast Disease
- Vol. 7 (1) , 16-22
Open AccessClinical Implication of Intraoperative Sonography in Localized Excision Biopsy for Mammographic Microcalcifications
- 4 February 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Vol. 175 (1) , 203-215
Retrospectively validating the results of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial in a large Asian Z0011-eligible cohort
Purpose The Z0011 trial demonstrated that axillary dissection (ALND) could be omitted during breast-conserving therapy for cT1-2N0 breast cancers with 1–2 metastatic SLNs. However, that result has not been validated in a larger cohort and the significance of the small number of SLNs remains unclear. This study aimed to validate the Z0011 results within an Asian Z0011-eligible cohort and determine whether the number of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) influenced the Z0011-based outcomes. Methods Data from Asian patients who fulfilled the Z0011 criteria were collected from five hospitals. Disease recurrence (DR) was compared between patients who underwent ALND or SLN dissection (SLND) alone. Propensity-score matching was performed to reduce the effects of potential selection biases. Results During 2010–2016, 1750 Asian patients had 1–2 SLN metastases and fulfilled the Z0011 criteria. These patients included 707 cases treated using SLND alone (40%) and 967 patients with ≤ 2 SLNs (55%). Ninety-five patients (5.4%) experienced DR at a median interval of 50 months, although the rates of DR were similar in the ALND and SLND groups. The adjusted hazard ratios for DR after ALND omission were 0.95 (95% CI 0.55–1.64) among the entire cohort and 0.83 (95% CI 0.34–2.03) among patients with ≤ 2 SLNs. Conclusions In this Asian Z0011-eligible cohort, ALND omission did not increase risk of DR, even among patients with ≤ 2 SLNs. Therefore, the Z0011 strategy might be safely applied in Asia, and a small number of SLNs did not significantly influence this strategy.
- 4 February 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Vol. 175 (1) , 203-215
Retrospectively validating the results of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial in a large Asian Z0011-eligible cohort
Purpose The Z0011 trial demonstrated that axillary dissection (ALND) could be omitted during breast-conserving therapy for cT1-2N0 breast cancers with 1–2 metastatic SLNs. However, that result has not been validated in a larger cohort and the significance of the small number of SLNs remains unclear. This study aimed to validate the Z0011 results within an Asian Z0011-eligible cohort and determine whether the number of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) influenced the Z0011-based outcomes. Methods Data from Asian patients who fulfilled the Z0011 criteria were collected from five hospitals. Disease recurrence (DR) was compared between patients who underwent ALND or SLN dissection (SLND) alone. Propensity-score matching was performed to reduce the effects of potential selection biases. Results During 2010–2016, 1750 Asian patients had 1–2 SLN metastases and fulfilled the Z0011 criteria. These patients included 707 cases treated using SLND alone (40%) and 967 patients with ≤ 2 SLNs (55%). Ninety-five patients (5.4%) experienced DR at a median interval of 50 months, although the rates of DR were similar in the ALND and SLND groups. The adjusted hazard ratios for DR after ALND omission were 0.95 (95% CI 0.55–1.64) among the entire cohort and 0.83 (95% CI 0.34–2.03) among patients with ≤ 2 SLNs. Conclusions In this Asian Z0011-eligible cohort, ALND omission did not increase risk of DR, even among patients with ≤ 2 SLNs. Therefore, the Z0011 strategy might be safely applied in Asia, and a small number of SLNs did not significantly influence this strategy.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2019
- Published by XMLink in Journal of Breast Cancer
- Vol. 22 (4) , 548-561
Prognostic Role of KRAS mRNA Expression in Breast Cancer
Hwang KT, et al. J Breast Cancer. 2019 Jul;22:e55. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e55
- 1 January 2019
- Published by XMLink in Journal of Breast Cancer
- Vol. 22 (4) , 548-561
Open AccessPrognostic Role of KRAS mRNA Expression in Breast Cancer
Hwang KT, et al. J Breast Cancer. 2019 Jul;22:e55. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e55
- Open Access
- 12 October 2018
- Published by Wiley in Cancer Medicine
- Vol. 7 (11) , 5514-5524
Clinical implication of subcategorizing T2 category into T2a and T2b in TNM staging of breast cancer
Regarding TNM staging in breast cancer, T2 category is currently not divided into subcategories even though it covers a wider range of tumor sizes than T1 category. Using Korean Breast Cancer Registry database, data of 41 071 women diagnosed as non‐metastatic T2 breast cancer between 2001 and 2014 were analyzed. Cutoff value for optimal tumor size was approximated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to subcategorize T2 tumors. Overall survival (OS) was compared between two subcategories. Median follow‐up period was 65 months. Of 41 071 patients, 4504 (11.0%) died. Based on ROC curve analysis, 3.0 cm was selected as the cutoff value. Five‐year OS rate was 91% in patients with breast tumors ≤3.0 cm (T2a) and 86% in patients with breast tumors >3.0 cm (T2b) (log‐rank P < 0.001). T2b subcategory showed worse OS than T2a subcategory regardless of node status (log‐rank P < 0.001 for all node categories). Within every subgroup defined by primary OS analysis covariates, T2b subcategory consistently showed worse outcome compared to T2a subcategory. By multivariate analysis, T2b subcategory was a significant independent prognostic factor of OS (hazard ratio: 1.26, 95% CI = 1.18‐1.34). T2 category of breast cancer could be subcategorized into T2a and T2b with a cutoff value of 3 cm. These subcategories definitely showed different OSs even after adjusted for known prognostic factors. Subcategorization of T2 category might be useful for predicting prognosis more accurately and tailoring adjuvant therapy.
- 12 October 2018
- Published by Wiley in Cancer Medicine
- Vol. 7 (11) , 5514-5524
Open AccessClinical implication of subcategorizing T2 category into T2a and T2b in TNM staging of breast cancer
Regarding TNM staging in breast cancer, T2 category is currently not divided into subcategories even though it covers a wider range of tumor sizes than T1 category. Using Korean Breast Cancer Registry database, data of 41 071 women diagnosed as non‐metastatic T2 breast cancer between 2001 and 2014 were analyzed. Cutoff value for optimal tumor size was approximated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to subcategorize T2 tumors. Overall survival (OS) was compared between two subcategories. Median follow‐up period was 65 months. Of 41 071 patients, 4504 (11.0%) died. Based on ROC curve analysis, 3.0 cm was selected as the cutoff value. Five‐year OS rate was 91% in patients with breast tumors ≤3.0 cm (T2a) and 86% in patients with breast tumors >3.0 cm (T2b) (log‐rank P < 0.001). T2b subcategory showed worse OS than T2a subcategory regardless of node status (log‐rank P < 0.001 for all node categories). Within every subgroup defined by primary OS analysis covariates, T2b subcategory consistently showed worse outcome compared to T2a subcategory. By multivariate analysis, T2b subcategory was a significant independent prognostic factor of OS (hazard ratio: 1.26, 95% CI = 1.18‐1.34). T2 category of breast cancer could be subcategorized into T2a and T2b with a cutoff value of 3 cm. These subcategories definitely showed different OSs even after adjusted for known prognostic factors. Subcategorization of T2 category might be useful for predicting prognosis more accurately and tailoring adjuvant therapy.