Catherine E. Bond

Colorectal cancer is an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The current treatment landscape includes chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. A key challenge to improving patient outcomes is the significant inter-patient heterogeneity in treatment response. Tumour organoids derived from the patients’ tumours via surgically resected or endoscopically biopsied tissue, have emerged as promising models for personalised medicine. This review synthesises the findings, to date, of studies which have explored the efficacy of ex vivo organoid sensitivity testing for predicting treatment response. Most studies have focused on predicting the response to standard-of-care radiotherapy and chemotherapy options. There is strong evidence to support organoid sensitivity testing of ionising radiation, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan, and to a lesser extent, oxaliplatin and TAS-102. Fewer studies have used organoids to identify patients who are likely to benefit from novel treatment options that otherwise remain in clinical trials. This review also summarises recent advancements in organoid culture to include non-epithelial components of the tumour microenvironment, to allow testing of immunotherapy and certain targeted therapy options. Overall, further prospective trials will support the implementation of organoid-based personalised medicine for colorectal cancer patients in the future.

Objective: Sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) are common across the age spectrum, but the BRAF mutant cancers arising occur predominantly in the elderly. Aberrant DNA methylation is uncommon in SSL from young patients. Here, we interrogate the role of ageing and DNA methylation in SSL initiation and progression. Design: We used an inducible model of Braf mutation to direct recombination of the oncogenic Braf V637E allele to the murine intestine. BRAF mutation was activated after periods of ageing, and tissue was assessed for histological, DNA methylation and gene expression changes thereafter. We also investigated DNA methylation alterations in human SSLs. Results: Inducing Braf mutation in aged mice was associated with a 10-fold relative risk of serrated lesions compared with young mice. There were extensive differences in age-associated DNA methylation between animals induced at 9 months versus wean, with relatively little differential Braf-specific methylation. DNA methylation at WNT pathway genes scales with age and Braf mutation accelerated age-associated DNA methylation. In human SSLs, increased epigenetic age was associated with high-risk serrated colorectal neoplasia. Conclusions: SSLs arising in the aged intestine are at a significantly higher risk of spontaneous neoplastic progression. These findings provide support for a new conceptual model for serrated colorectal carcinogenesis, whereby risk of Braf-induced neoplastic transformation is dependent on age and may be related to age-associated molecular alterations that accumulate in the ageing intestine, including DNA methylation. This may have implications for surveillance and chemopreventive strategies targeting the epigenome.

Background: WNT activation is a hallmark of colorectal cancer. BRAF mutation is present in 15% of colorectal cancers, and the role of mutations in WNT signaling regulators in this context is unclear. Here, we evaluate the mutational landscape of WNT signaling regulators in BRAF mutant cancers. Methods: we performed exome-sequencing on 24 BRAF mutant colorectal cancers and analyzed these data in combination with 175 publicly available BRAF mutant colorectal cancer exomes. We assessed the somatic mutational landscape of WNT signaling regulators, and performed hotspot and driver mutation analyses to identify potential drivers of WNT signaling. The effects of Apc and Braf mutation were modelled, in vivo, using the Apc^min/+ and Braf^V637/Villin-Cre^ERT2/+ mouse, respectively. Results: RNF43 was the most frequently mutated WNT signaling regulator (41%). Mutations in the beta-catenin destruction complex occurred in 48% of cancers. Hotspot analyses identified potential cancer driver genes in the WNT signaling cascade, including MEN1, GNG12 and WNT16. Truncating APC mutation was identified in 20.8% of cancers. Truncating APC mutation was associated with early age at diagnosis (p < 2 × 10⁻⁵), advanced stage (p < 0.01), and poor survival (p = 0.026). Apc^min/+/Braf^V637 animals had more numerous and larger SI and colonic lesions (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.05, respectively), and a markedly reduced survival (median survival: 3.2 months, p = 8.8 × 10⁻²¹), compared to animals with Apc or Braf mutation alone. Conclusions: the WNT signaling axis is frequently mutated in BRAF mutant colorectal cancers. WNT16 and MEN1 may be novel drivers of aberrant WNT signaling in colorectal cancer. Co-mutation of BRAF and APC generates an extremely aggressive neoplastic phenotype that is associated with poor patient outcome.

Background & Aims: WNT activation is a hallmark of colorectal cancer. BRAF mutation is present in 15% of colorectal cancers, and the role of mutations in WNT signaling regulators in this context is unclear. Here we evaluate the mutational landscape of WNT signaling regulators in BRAF mutant cancers. Methods: We performed exome-sequencing on 24 BRAF mutant colorectal cancers and analysed these data in combination with 175 publicly available BRAF mutant colorectal cancer exomes. We assessed the somatic mutational landscape of WNT signaling regulators, and performed hotspot and driver mutation analyses to identify potential drivers of WNT signaling. The effects of Apc and Braf mutation were modelled, in vivo , using the Apc ^{min/ +} and Braf ^V637 /Villin-Cre ^{ERT2/ +} mouse , respectively. Results: RNF43 was the most frequently mutated WNT signaling regulator (41%). Mutations in the beta-catenin destruction complex occurred in 48% of cancers. Hotspot analyses identified potential cancer driver genes in the WNT signaling cascade, including MEN1, GNG12 and WNT16 . Truncating APC mutation was identified in 20.8% of cancers. Truncating APC mutation was associated with early age at diagnosis (P< 2×10 ⁻⁵ ), advanced stage (PApc ^{min/ +} /Braf ^V637 animals had more numerous and larger SI and colonic lesions (P−21 ) compared to animals with Apc or Braf mutation alone. Conclusions: The WNT signaling axis is frequently mutated in BRAF mutant colorectal cancers. WNT16 and MEN1 may be novel drivers of aberrant WNT signaling in colorectal cancer. Co-mutation of BRAF and APC generates an extremely aggressive neoplastic phenotype that is associated with poor patient outcome. Synopsis: We have comprehensively evaluated the somatic mutation landscape of WNT signaling regulators in serrated colorectal cancers. We identified a mosaic of mutations that may be responsible for elevating WNT signaling in this context. Approximately 20% of serrated colorectal cancers harbor truncating APC mutation, and these cancers confer extremely poor prognoses.

TheBRAFoncogene is an integral component of the MAP kinase pathway, and an activating V600E mutation occurs in 15% of sporadic colorectal cancer. This is an early event in serrated pathway tumourigenesis, and theBRAFV600E has been commonly associated with the CpG island methylator phenotype, microsatellite instability (MSI), and a consistent clinical presentation including a proximal location and predilection for elderly females. A proportion of theBRAFmutant lesions remain as microsatellite stable (MSS), and in contrast to the MSI cancers, they have an aggressive phenotype and correlate with poor patient outcomes. Recent studies have found that they have clinical and molecular features of both theBRAFmutant/MSI and the conventionalBRAFwild-type cancers and comprise a distinct colorectal cancer subgroup. This review highlights the importance of theBRAFmutation occurring in colorectal cancer stratified for molecular background and discusses its prognostic and clinical significance.

Sessile serrated adenomas with BRAF mutation progress rapidly to cancer following the development of dysplasia (SSAD). Approximately 75% of SSADs methylate the mismatch repair gene MLH1, develop mismatch repair deficiency and the resultant cancers have a good prognosis. The remaining SSADs and BRAF mutant traditional serrated adenomas (TSA) develop into microsatellite stable cancers with a poor prognosis. The reason for this dichotomy is unknown. In this study, we assessed the genotypic frequency of the MLH1–93 polymorphism rs1800734 in SSADs and TSAs to determine if the uncommon variant A allele predisposes to MLH1 promoter hypermethylation. We performed genotyping for the MLH1–93 polymorphism, quantitative methylation specific PCR, and MLH1 immunohistochemistry on 124 SSAD, 128 TSA, 203 BRAF mutant CRCs and 147 control subjects with normal colonoscopy. The minor A allele was significantly associated with a dose dependent increase in methylation at the MLH1 promoter in SSADs (p = 0.022). The AA genotype was only observed in SSADs with MLH1 loss. The A allele was also overrepresented in BRAF mutant cancers with MLH1 loss. Only one of the TSAs showed loss of MLH1 and the overall genotype distribution in TSAs did not differ from controls. The MLH1–93 AA genotype is significantly associated with promoter hypermethylation and MLH1 loss in the context of SSADs. BRAF mutant microsatellite stable colorectal cancers with the AA genotype most likely arise in TSAs since the A allele does not predispose to methylation in this context.

RNF43 and ZNRF3 are commonly altered in serrated pathway colorectal tumorigenesis

PRDM5 is an epigenetic regulator that has been recognized as an important tumour suppressor gene. Silencing of PRDM5 by promoter hypermethylation has been demonstrated in several cancer types and PRDM5 loss results in upregulation of the Wnt pathway and increased cellular proliferation. PRDM5 has not been extensively investigated in specific subtypes of colorectal cancers. We hypothesized it would be more commonly methylated and inactivated in serrated pathway colorectal cancers that are hallmarked by a BRAF V600E mutation and a methylator phenotype, compared to traditional pathway cancers that are BRAF wild type. Cancer (214 BRAF mutant, 122 BRAF wild type) and polyp (59 serrated polyps, 40 conventional adenomas) cohorts were analysed for PRDM5 promoter methylation using MethyLight technology. PRDM5 protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in cancers and polyps. Mutation of PRDM5 was analysed using cBioPortal’s publicly available database. BRAF mutant cancers had significantly more frequent PRDM5 promoter methylation than BRAF wild type cancers (77/214,36% vs 4/122,3%; p<0.0001). Serrated type polyps had a lower methylation rate than cancers but were more commonly methylated than conventional adenomas (6/59,10% vs 0/40,0%). PRDM5 methylation was associated with advanced stages of presentation (p<0.05) and the methylator phenotype (p=0.03). PRDM5 protein expression was substantially down-regulated in both BRAF mutant and wild type cancer cohorts (92/97,95% and 39/44,89%). The polyp subgroups showed less silencing than the cancers, but similar rates were found between the serrated and conventional polyp cohorts (29/59, 49%; 23/40, 58% respectively). Of 295 colorectal cancers, PRDM5 was mutated in only 6 (2%) cancers which were all BRAF wild type. Serrated pathway colorectal cancers demonstrated early and progressive PRDM5 methylation with advancing disease. Interestingly, PRDM5 protein expression was substantially reduced in all polyp types and more so in cancers which also indicates early and increasing PRDM5 down-regulation with disease progression. Methylation may be contributing to gene silencing in a proportion of BRAF mutant cancers, but the large extent of absent protein expression indicates other mechanisms are also responsible for this. These data suggest that PRDM5 is a relevant tumour suppressor gene that is frequently targeted in colorectal tumourigenesis.

The BRAF (V600E) mutation in colorectal cancers that are microsatellite stable (MSS) confers a poor patient prognosis, whereas BRAF mutant microsatellite-unstable (MSI) colorectal cancers have an excellent prognosis. BRAF wild type cancers are typically MSS and display chromosomal instability (CIN). CIN has not been extensively studied on a genome-wide basis in relation to BRAF mutational status in colorectal cancer. BRAF mutant/MSS (BRAFmut/MSS) cancers (n = 33) and BRAF mutant/MSI (BRAFmut/MSI) cancers (n = 30) were compared for presence of copy number aberrations (CNAs) indicative of CIN, with BRAF wild type/MSS (BRAFwt/MSS) cancers (n = 18) using Illumina CytoSNP-12 arrays. BRAFmut/MSS and BRAFwt/MSS cancers showed comparable numbers of CNAs/cancer at 32.8 and 29.8 respectively. However, there were differences in patterns of CNA length between MSS cohorts, with BRAFmut/MSS cancers having significantly greater proportions of focal CNAs compared to BRAFwt/MSS cancers (pBRAFwt/MSS cancers (pBRAFmut/MSS compared to BRAFwt/MSS cancers (20.7 Mb vs 33.4 Mb;pBRAFmut/MSS compared to BRAFwt/MSS cancers (23.9% vs 34.9% respectively). BRAFmut/MSI cancers were confirmed to have low CNA rates (5.4/cancer) and minimal CIN-affected genomes (average of 4.5%) compared to MSS cohorts (pBRAFmut/MSS cancers had more frequent deletion CNAs compared to BRAFwt/MSS cancers on 6p and 17q at loci not typically correlated with colorectal cancer, and greater amplification CNAs on 8q and 18q compared to BRAFwt/MSS cancers. These results indicate that comparable rates of CIN occur between MSS subgroups, however significant differences in their patterns of instability exist, with BRAFmut/MSS cancers showing a ‘focal pattern’ and BRAFwt/MSS cancers having a ‘whole arm pattern’ of CIN. This and the genomic loci more frequently affected in BRAFmut/MSS cancers provides further evidence of the biological distinctions of this important cancer subgroup.