Lennart G.L. van der Zwaan
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Lennart G.L. van der Zwaan has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Allard J. van der Beek
Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
2 shared publications - Astrid de Wind
Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
2 shared publications - Cecile R. L. Boot
Radboud University, Behavioural Science Institute Nijmegen the Netherlands
2 shared publications - Ranu Sewdas
Sewdas Free University of Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands
2 shared publications - Romy Steenbeek
TNO Work and Health, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands
2 shared publications - Karen M. Oude Hengel
Unit Health and Work, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Leiden, The Netherlands
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 4 December 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
- Vol. 92 (4) , 535-549
The role of personal characteristics, work environment and context in working beyond retirement: a mixed-methods study
To investigate the role of personal characteristics, work environment and context in working beyond retirement.
- 4 December 2018
- Published by Springer Nature in International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
- Vol. 92 (4) , 535-549
Open AccessThe role of personal characteristics, work environment and context in working beyond retirement: a mixed-methods study
To investigate the role of personal characteristics, work environment and context in working beyond retirement.
- Open Access
- 22 August 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 17 (1) , 1-9
Why older workers work beyond the retirement age: a qualitative study
The aims of the present study were to: 1) gain insight into reasons for working beyond the statutory retirement age from older workers’ perspectives, and 2) explore how the domains of the research framework Study on Transitions in Employment, Ability and Motivation (STREAM) can be applied to working beyond retirement age. A qualitative research design included individual interviews (n = 15) and three focus groups (n = 18 participants) conducted with older workers aged 65 years and older continuing in a paid job or self-employment. Interview participants were recruited from an existing STREAM cohort study. Focus group participants were recruited from companies and employment agencies. The data were subjected to thematic analysis. The most important motives for working beyond retirement age were maintaining daily routines and financial benefit. Good health and flexible work arrangements were mentioned as important preconditions. The themes emerging from the categorization of the motives and preconditions corresponded to the domains of health, work characteristics, skills and knowledge, and social and financial factors from the STREAM research framework. However, our analysis revealed one additional theme—purpose in life. This study offers important new insights into the various preconditions and motives that influence working beyond retirement age. In addition, the five domains of the STREAM research framework, including the additional domain of ‘purpose in life’, seem to be applicable to working beyond retirement age. This knowledge contributes to the development of work-related interventions that enhance older workers’ motivation to prolong their working lives.
- 22 August 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 17 (1) , 1-9
Open AccessWhy older workers work beyond the retirement age: a qualitative study
The aims of the present study were to: 1) gain insight into reasons for working beyond the statutory retirement age from older workers’ perspectives, and 2) explore how the domains of the research framework Study on Transitions in Employment, Ability and Motivation (STREAM) can be applied to working beyond retirement age. A qualitative research design included individual interviews (n = 15) and three focus groups (n = 18 participants) conducted with older workers aged 65 years and older continuing in a paid job or self-employment. Interview participants were recruited from an existing STREAM cohort study. Focus group participants were recruited from companies and employment agencies. The data were subjected to thematic analysis. The most important motives for working beyond retirement age were maintaining daily routines and financial benefit. Good health and flexible work arrangements were mentioned as important preconditions. The themes emerging from the categorization of the motives and preconditions corresponded to the domains of health, work characteristics, skills and knowledge, and social and financial factors from the STREAM research framework. However, our analysis revealed one additional theme—purpose in life. This study offers important new insights into the various preconditions and motives that influence working beyond retirement age. In addition, the five domains of the STREAM research framework, including the additional domain of ‘purpose in life’, seem to be applicable to working beyond retirement age. This knowledge contributes to the development of work-related interventions that enhance older workers’ motivation to prolong their working lives.