Midhun Mohan

Aboveground biomass (AGB) mapping is fundamental to tropical forest carbon monitoring, yet national-scale estimation remains challenging because field plots are sparse and model performance is often sensitive to predictor choice and validation design. This study assessed whether geospatial embeddings improve national AGB mapping in Guyana when combined with environmental and topographic predictors. Predictor selection was undertaken using repeated grouped resampling at the plot-cluster level, and model performance was evaluated across 100 independent train–test repeats. Three final random forest models were compared. The environmental baseline model (Env + SRTM-derived elevation; 8 predictors) achieved a mean R² of 0.179, an RMSE of 148.5 Mg/ha and a relative RMSE of 36.1%. A retained 8-predictor model combining environmental variables with a selected embedding subset (Env + Emb*) improved performance slightly, with a mean R² of 0.189, an RMSE of 147.6 Mg/ha and a relative RMSE of 35.9%. The best performance was obtained with a 22-variable full-stack model combining environmental, topographic and embedding predictors, after all Sentinel-2 predictors had been eliminated during feature selection; this model achieved a mean R² of 0.203, an RMSE of 146.3 Mg/ha and a relative RMSE of 35.5%. Across models, isothermality, a measure of how day-to-night temperature variation compares to annual temperature variation, and precipitation of the coldest quarter were consistently the most influential predictors. Mean ensemble coefficient of variation, representing relative model disagreement, ranged from 0.336 to 0.361. These results indicate that geospatial embeddings provide useful complementary information, but predictive performance remained modest overall, with the best model explaining only about one-fifth of plot-level AGB variance. The resulting maps are therefore best interpreted as broad-scale decision-support products rather than high-precision local estimates of AGB.

The extension of NASA’s Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) mission beyond the cryosphere to include the study of vegetation and the land surface has significantly advanced global Earth observation. This review synthesizes findings from 293 peer-reviewed articles and provides a comprehensive assessment of the mission’s contributions to terrestrial ecosystem science. We begin by outlining the mission’s objectives, instrumentation, and core data products—particularly ATL03 (geolocated photons) and ATL08 (terrain and canopy heights)—which have supported a wide array of applications in forestry, terrain analysis, and environmental monitoring. Our analysis shows that most studies focus on temperate and tropical broadleaf forests, with a strong emphasis on estimating canopy height, terrain elevation, and forest structure. Terrain metrics derived from ICESat-2 products typically achieve high accuracy, while vegetation variables, such as canopy height, cover, leaf area index (LAI), and aboveground biomass, demonstrate moderate to strong accuracies across biomes. While parametric models remain the most used approach, machine learning methods are expanding, and more than one third of the reviewed literature incorporates synergistic analyses with other satellite missions. Despite its versatility, ICESat-2 remains underutilized in several key domains—including nonforest vegetation, fire ecology, wildlife habitat assessment, urban monitoring, and disturbance detection—mainly due to the scarcity of standardized algorithms and validated reference datasets. However, the growing availability of open source processing tools presents a significant opportunity for expanding the user base and fostering innovation in these emerging areas. Future advancements, such as the forthcoming ATL18 gridded canopy height and terrain products, alongside synergies with missions like the European Space Agency (ESA)’s BIOMASS and the NASA–Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) Synthetic Aperture Radar (NISAR), promise to enhance multisensor integration and ecosystem monitoring. Overall, ICESat-2 continues to evolve as a powerful resource for characterizing vegetation structure, ecosystem dynamics, and land surface processes on a global scale.

Tropical second-growth forests of the Amazon sequester large amounts of carbon and are important carbon sinks, contributing substantially to climate change mitigation, biodiversity conservation, and providing crucial ecosystem services. Deforestation due to selective logging and shifting cultivation is expanding second-growth forest areas in tropical forest regions, which if well managed, regenerate rapidly over time. Maximum forest canopy height is an important metric of biomass and carbon accumulation in second-growth forests and is strongly influenced by water availability. The water limitation hypothesis explains the positive influence of water availability on maximum tree heights and has been examined and demonstrated at a small-scale using field data, and at a global scale, with limited accuracy, using remote sensing data in tropical ecosystems. However, this hypothesis concerning maximum canopy height has not been much studied at regional and national scales for tropical second-growth forests. In this study, we leveraged NASA GEDI spaceborne lidar data across the Brazilian Amazon and derived second-growth forest relative height metrics for delineating the influence of water availability, second-growth forest age, and topographic elevation on maximum canopy height. Water availability was found to significantly influence the maximum canopy height of second-growth forest trees, of age range from 30 to 35 years, at elevations less than 500 m and maximum precipitation thresholds of 1500 mm. Our results indicate that changing precipitation patterns or increased drought conditions under different climate change regimes could impact forest structure, plant communities, ecosystem functioning, and carbon sequestration capabilities of tropical second-growth forests in the Amazon.

Mangrove ecosystems provide essential services, acting as natural barriers that help to curb the spread of vector-borne diseases. This article examines how restoring mangroves can play a key role in reducing such disease transmission by enhancing habitats of the natural predators of disease vectors and creating ecological conditions that hinder vector populations, particularly mosquitoes. Herein, we leverage the advancement of UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) technology and propose ten strategies—including (1) identification and restoration of hydrological connectivity, (2) diverse planting methods, (3) community involvement and visualizations, (4) restoration monitoring and maintenance, (5) integrated vector management, (6) optimal site selection based on vector habitats, (7) early detection of tree mortality, (8) tracking wildlife populations and movement, (9) real-time data collection and analysis, and (10) management and predictive modeling under climate change—through which targeted mangrove restoration can serve as a nature-based solution (NbS) for disease control. Our goal is to facilitate the integration of public health objectives into mangrove ecosystem management with the support of low-cost and widely available UAVs. Ultimately, effective mangrove restoration could offer a sustainable approach to reducing the growing threat of vector-borne diseases in coastal areas, safeguarding the environment, wildlife, and human health.

Mangrove ecosystems are critical for coastal protection, biodiversity and carbon storage. However, they face increasing threats from conflicts and wars. This paper discusses the overlooked impacts of regional and global-level armed conflicts on mangroves – including habitat destruction, disrupted conservation efforts and displaced communities. Focusing on war-affected countries, I emphasize the urgent need for global attention and tailored conservation strategies. In this regard advanced technologies like remote sensing and AI (artificial intelligence) could be used for monitoring rapid changes in mangrove cover during conflicts, detecting conflict-related drivers of mangrove loss, assessing status of restored mangroves in hard-to-access and unsafe areas, providing real-time deforestation alerts, tracking community movements, enabling automated damage assessment and much more. Protecting mangroves in conflict zones is essential for preserving both environmental and human resilience, and there exists a need to adopt novel technology-based conservation approaches.

The distribution of forest aboveground biomass density (AGBD) is a key indicator of carbon stock and ecosystem health in the Eastern Himalayas, which represents a global biodiversity hotspot that sustains diverse forest types across an elevation gradient from lowland rainforests to alpine meadows and contributes to the livelihoods of more than 200 distinct indigenous communities. This study aimed to identify the key factors influencing forest AGBD across this region by analyzing the underlying biophysical and anthropogenic drivers through machine learning (random forest). We processed AGBD data from the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) spaceborne LiDAR and applied filtering to retain 30,257 high-quality footprints across ten ecoregions. We then analyzed the relationship between AGBD and 17 climatic, topographic, soil, and anthropogenic variables using random forest regression models. The results revealed significant spatial variability in AGBD (149.6 ± 79.5 Mg ha⁻¹) across the region. State-wise, Sikkim recorded the highest mean AGBD (218 Mg ha⁻¹) and Manipur the lowest (102.8 Mg ha⁻¹). Within individual ecoregions, the Himalayan subtropical pine forests exhibited the highest mean AGBD (245.5 Mg ha⁻¹). Topographic factors, particularly elevation and latitude, were strong determinants of biomass distribution, with AGBD increasing up to elevations of 2000 m before declining. Protected areas (PAs) consistently showed higher AGBD than unprotected forests for all ecoregions, while proximity to urban and agricultural areas resulted in lower AGBD, pointing towards negative anthropogenic impacts. Our full model explained 41% of AGBD variance across the Eastern Himalayas, with better performance in individual ecoregions like the Northeast India-Myanmar pine forests (R² = 0.59). While limited by the absence of regionally explicit stand-level forest structure data (age, stand density, species composition), our results provide valuable evidence for conservation policy development, including expansion of PAs, compensating avoided deforestation and modifications in shifting cultivation. Future research should integrate field measurements with remote sensing and use high-resolution LiDAR with locally derived allometric models to enhance biomass estimation and GEDI data validation.

Accurate mapping of aboveground biomass density (AGBD) is vital for ecological research and carbon cycle monitoring. Integrating multi-source remote sensing data offers significant potential to enhance the accuracy and coverage of AGBD estimates. This study evaluated three upscaling frameworks for integrating GEDI LiDAR, SAR, and optical satellite data to create wall-to-wall AGBD maps. The frameworks tested in this paper were: (1) a single-step approach using optical imagery, (2) a two-stage approach with GEDI-derived variables, and (3) a three-stage approach combining imagery and in situ-derived allometries. Internal validation showed that framework 1 achieved the lowest root mean square difference (%RMSD) of 53.3% and highest coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.53. An independent external validation of the AGBD map was performed using in situ observations, also revealing that framework 1 was the most accurate (%RMSD = 39.3% and R² = 0.93), while frameworks 2 and 3 were less accurate (%RMSD = 54.7, 44.7 and R² = 0.95, 0.90, respectively). Herein, we show that upscaling frameworks significantly impacted AGBD map uncertainty and the magnitude of estimate differences. Our findings suggest that upscaling framework 1 based on a single step approach was the most effective for capturing detailed AGBD variations, while careful consideration of model sensitivity and map uncertainties is essential for reliable AGBD estimation. This study provides valuable insights for advancing forest AGBD monitoring and highlights the potential for further enhancements in remote sensing methodologies.

The rapid development of UAV-LiDAR and data processing capabilities is likely to enable accurate individual-tree inventories in the near future, requiring few on-ground calibration measurements. Using data collected from 20 radiata pine trials dispersed across New Zealand, the objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of high-density UAV-LiDAR for the prediction of tree diameter and volume, under a range of data calibration scenarios. Using all measurements for the calibration (a range of 335–4703 tree measurements across the 20 sites), accurate random forest models for each of the 20 sites were created from a diverse range of LiDAR metrics that characterised the horizontal and vertical structures of the canopy. Averaged across the 20 sites, predictions had a mean R² and relative RMSE (rRMSE) of, respectively, 0.713 and 9.699% for the tree diameter and 0.746 and 19.57% for the tree volume. Reductions in the numbers of calibration trees per trial had little effect on model accuracy until only 300 trees/site were used; however, accurate, unbiased predictions were still possible using as few as 100 trees/site. More generally, applicable random forest models for both tree dimensions were constructed by collating all of the data and tested using leave-one-site-out cross-validation to determine the accuracy of the model predictions when calibration measurements were not available. The predictions using this approach were reasonable but less accurate and more biased than with the use of calibration data, with a mean R² and rRMSE of, respectively, 0.631 and 15.12% for the tree diameter and 0.631 and 35.6% for the volume. Our research aims to facilitate the transition from a plot-based to tree-level inventory in plantation forests and contribute to the future development of a generalised model that could accurately predict tree dimensions from UAV-LiDAR, relying on minimal field measurements.