Maria Raffaella Barbaro

Background: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a disorder of gut‐brain interaction often accompanied by psychiatric and/or somatic comorbidities. Intestinal‐barrier dysfunction has been implicated in IBS pathophysiology. However, the contribution of psychiatric and somatic comorbidities to intestinal permeability remains unclear. We aimed to assess intestinal permeability in a large multicentric cohort of IBS patients with and without psychiatric and/or somatic comorbidities, compared with disease controls, and healthy subjects. Methods: IBS patients and disease controls were recruited across nine European centres. Small intestinal and colonic permeabilities were assessed using the lactulose‐mannitol‐sucralose urinary excretion test. Urinary sugar concentrations were quantified by gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry. Analyses were adjusted for relevant clinical and lifestyle confounders. Results: The lactulose/mannitol (L/M) ratio, but not the percentage of sucralose (%S), was significantly increased in IBS patients ( N = 418) compared with disease controls ( N = 200), regardless of IBS subtype or sex. Notably, the increased L/M in IBS patients was primarly driven by a significant decrease in mannitol excretion. IBS patients with psychiatric or combined psychiatric and somatic comorbidities showed a higher L/M than their corresponding disease control groups. However, L/M values did not differ between IBS patients with and without comorbidities. Substantial between‐centre variability in L/M ratios awas observed. Discussion: Small intestinal, but not colonic, permeability, as reflected by an elevated L/M ratio, is increased in IBS patients. These alterations seem to be related to the presence of IBS per se rather than to comorbid conditions. Interestingly, substantial geographic variability was observed, which may reflect environmental or population‐related factors influencing barrier function. Further investigations are needed to better understand the clinical relevance of these findings.

The gut microbiota significantly impacts the development and progression of upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, including esophageal and gastric cancers. Microbial dysbiosis contributes to carcinogenesis through mechanisms such as inflammation, immune modulation, and direct DNA damage. Techniques for sampling oral, esophageal, and gastric microbiota vary, with standardization being essential for reliable results. Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) are associated with an enrichment of Gram-negative bacteria, promoting inflammation and cancer progression. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) also shows distinct microbial patterns, with reduced diversity and increased harmful bacteria like Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum. In gastric cancer (GC), Helicobacter pylori (HP) and non-HP gastric microbiota play significant roles, with diverse microbial communities contributing to cancer development through nitrate reduction, immune modulation, and inflammation. Emerging evidence highlights the role of non-HP bacteria in promoting carcinogenesis, with specific taxa like Fusobacterium nucleatum and Lactobacillus influencing tumor growth and immune evasion. Further research is needed to elucidate the complex interactions between gut microbiota and upper GI cancers, paving the way for novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Understanding these microbial dynamics offers potential for microbiota-based interventions, improving the early detection, prognosis, and treatment of upper GI cancers. This comprehensive review summarizes the available evidence on the role of microbiota in upper GI oncology and the need for continued exploration in this field.

Background: The disruption of the intestinal barrier and the imbalance of the gut microbiota (GM) seem to play a major role in the complex pathogenesis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Specific microbial strains could improve the gut microenvironment, promoting anti-inflammatory pathways; similarly, vitamin D supplementation could play a role in enhancing the barrier integrity and modulating the immune response in the gut. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a new multistrain probiotic, combined with vitamin D, in improving gut barrier function in IBS without constipation. Methods: In this phase IIb double-blind randomized placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, clinical trial, 35 patients were treated for 12 weeks with OttaBac^®, a high concentration multistrain probiotic plus cholecalciferol, or placebo and were followed up until week 16. Symptoms, quality of life, intestinal permeability, fecal biomarkers, and microbiota composition were evaluated at 0, 12, and 16 weeks. Results: Mean zonulin values showed a significant progressive reduction in the active group (−10.2 ng/mL at week 12, p = 0.0375; −19.5 ng/mL at week 16, p = 0.0002), with a significant difference between groups at week 16 in the per-protocol population (−19.01, p = 0.0053). The active group showed a more stable trend toward improvement in stool frequency and consistency at both week 12 and 16, with a significant improvement compared to the baseline and to the placebo group (−23.2, p = 0.0265, and 5.57 vs. −23.2, p = 0.0492, respectively). No differences were found in regards to the lactulose/mannitol ratio, Irritable Bowel Syndrome Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) total scores, plasmalemmal vesicle associated protein-1 (PV-1), and citrulline levels. In the active group, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis and Streptococcus thermophilus levels were increased (p < 0.05), while those for Lachnospira were decreased (p < 0.05), and significant changes in Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria were observed (p < 0.05). Lactate (p < 0.01) and acetate (p < 0.05) levels increased post-treatment. Correlation analysis pointed out a significant association between the microbial biomarkers and the symptoms (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Probiotic plus vitamin D could improve IBS-associated symptoms through gut microbiota modulation and gut barrier enhancement, with persistent benefits after treatment discontinuation.

Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a disorder of gut- brain interaction characterized by recurrent abdominal pain associated with altered bowel habits. The therapeutic options for IBS patients include the use of probiotics. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a multi-strain probiotic made up by Lactobacillus rhamnosus LR 32, Bifidobacterium lactis BL 04, and Bifidobacterium longum BB 536 (Serobioma, Bromatech s.r.l., Milano, Italy) on an in vitro model of the intestinal epithelial barrier in the presence of mucosal mediators that are released by IBS patients. IBS (n = 28; IBS with predominant diarrhea, IBS-D = 10; IBS with predominant constipation, IBS-C = 9; and IBS with mixed bowel habits, IBS-M = 9) patients, diagnosed according to the Rome IV criteria, and asymptomatic controls (ACs, n = 7) were enrolled. Mucosal mediators that were spontaneously released by colonic biopsies were collected (supernatants). Two doses of Serobioma were tested with/without IBS/AC mediators. RNA was extracted from Caco-2 cells to evaluate the tight junction (TJ) expression. Serobioma (10⁶ CFU/mL) significantly reinforced the Caco-2 monolayer compared to growth medium alone (p < 0.05). IBS supernatants significantly increased Caco-2 paracellular permeability compared to the AC supernatants. The co-incubation of Caco-2 cells with IBS supernatants and Serobioma (10⁶ CFU/mL) avoided the paracellular permeability alterations that were induced by IBS supernatants alone (p < 0.001), and, in particular, IBS-D and IBS-M ones. The co-incubation of Serobioma (10⁶ CFU/mL) and IBS-D supernatants significantly increased ZO-1 expression compared to Caco-2 cells incubated with supernatants alone (p < 0.05), as confirmed via qPCR analyses. Serobioma (10⁶ CFU/mL) counteracts the paracellular permeability changes that are induced by IBS supernatants, in particular IBS-D and IBS-M supernatants, likely modulating ZO-1 expression.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disorder of gut–brain interaction, with a multifactorial pathophysiology involving gut–brain axis dysregulation, visceral hypersensitivity, microbiota imbalance, and immune dysfunction. Traditional IBS management emphasizes dietary modifications and pharmacologic therapies. However, increasing attention has been directed toward functional foods, nutraceuticals, and herbal remedies due to their potential to target IBS pathophysiological mechanisms with favorable safety profiles. This clinical review explores the role of these adjunctive therapies, evaluating evidence from preclinical and clinical studies. Functional foods such as kiwifruit, prunes, and rye bread demonstrate benefits in bowel habit regulation through fiber content and microbiota modulation. Nutraceuticals like peppermint oil, palmitoylethanolamide, and herbal mixtures exhibit anti-inflammatory, antispasmodic, and analgesic effects. Prebiotics provide substrate-driven microbiota changes, although dosage is key, as given their fermentative properties, when used at high dosages, they can exacerbate symptoms in some individuals. Probiotics and postbiotics offer microbiota-based interventions with promising symptom relief in IBS subtypes, although factors for personalized treatment still need to be further elucidated. These strategies highlight a paradigm shift in IBS management, integrating diet-based therapies with evolving nutraceutical options to improve patient outcomes. Despite promising findings, challenges in standardizing definitions, mechanisms, and safety profiles still remain. Rigorous, large-scale trials to validate the therapeutic potential of these interventions are needed, to enhance the benefits of these compounds with an individualized treatment approach.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are an emerging group of pathological entities characterized by an eosinophil-predominant infiltration of different tracts of the gut in the absence of secondary causes of eosinophilia. According to the specific tract of the gut involved, EGIDs can be classified into eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), eosinophilic gastritis (EoG), eosinophilic enteritis (EoN), and eosinophilic colitis (EoC). The epidemiology of EGIDs is evolving rapidly. EoE, once considered a rare disease, now has an incidence and prevalence of 7.7 new cases per 100,000 inhabitants per years and 34.4 cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year, respectively. Fewer data are available regarding non-EoE EGIDs, whose prevalence are estimated to range between 2.1 and 17.6 in 100,000 individuals, depending on age, sex, and ethnicity. Diagnosis requires the presence of suggestive symptoms, endoscopic biopsies showing abnormal values of eosinophils infiltrating the gut, and exclusion of secondary causes of eosinophilia. EoE typically presents with dysphagia and episodes of food bolus impactions, while EoG, EoN, and EoC may all present with abdominal pain and diarrhea, with or without other non-specific symptoms. In addition, although different EGIDs are currently classified as different entities, there may be overlap between different diseases in the same patient. Despite EGIDs being relatively novel pathological entities, the research on possible treatments is rapidly growing. In this regard, several randomized controlled trials are currently ongoing to investigate novel molecules, including ad-hoc steroid formulations, immunosuppressants, and mostly monoclonal antibodies that target the specific molecular mediators of EGIDs. This narrative review provides an up-to-date overview of available and investigational drugs for different EGIDs.

LINKED CONTENT: This article is linked to Marasco et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17513 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17549

Background: Diverticular disease (DD) is a common condition in Western countries. The role of microbiota in the pathogenesis of DD and its related symptoms has been frequently postulated since most complications of this disease are bacteria‐driven and most therapies rely on microbiota modulation. Preliminary data showed fecal microbial imbalance in patients with DD, particularly when symptomatic, with an increase of pro‐inflammatory and potentially pathogenetic bacteria. In addition, bacterial metabolic markers can mirror specific pathways of the disease and may be even used for monitoring treatment effects. All treatments currently suggested for DD can affect microbiota structure and metabolome compositions.Purpose: Sparse evidence is available linking gut microbiota perturbations, diverticular disease pathophysiology, and symptom development. We aimed to summarize the available knowledge on gut microbiota evaluation in diverticular disease, with a focus on symptomatic uncomplicated DD, and the relative treatment strategies.