JGJulia M. Goodman

Julia M. Goodman

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Julia M. Goodman has a total of 48 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Dawn M. Richardson

    Julia M. Goodman and Dawn M. Richardson are with the School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University–Portland State University, Portland, OR. Anna Steeves-Reece is with OCHIN, Inc., Portland, OR

    4 shared publications
  • William H. Dow

    School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley

    4 shared publications
  • William H. Dow

    Julia M. Goodman and Dawn M. Richardson are with the Oregon Health and Science University and Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland. William H. Dow is with the School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley

    3 shared publications
  • Anna Steeves-Reece

    Oregon Health & Science University–Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, USA

    2 shared publications
  • Blair Grant Darney

    Oregon Health & Science University

    2 shared publications
  • Caitlin Gerdts

    Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, California, USA

    2 shared publications

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Supporting self-managed abortion care in “practice not premise”: a qualitative study of provider perspectives, roles, and information pathways to care in India*

    by Laura E. Jacobson, Caila Brander, Balasubramanian Palanisamy, Sruthi Chandrasekaran, Blair G. Darney, Julia M. Goodman, Ruvani Jayaweera, Caitlin Gerdts

    This qualitative study explored provider perspectives on self-managed abortion (SMA) in India, their roles, and how they share information about pathways to both clinician- and self-managed abortion care. We conducted 33 semi-structured interviews with a range of providers (medical, community health, and pharmacy) in three states in India: Jharkhand, Bihar, and Tamil Nadu. Using thematic analysis, we examined provider perspectives on SMA, their involvement in abortion care, and how they contribute to information-sharing around access pathways. We categorised findings by provider type, direction of care pathways, abortion modality (clinician-managed vs. SMA), and the kind of care delivered. Our findings showed most providers described abortion as conditionally acceptable and primarily encouraged clinician-managed care. Concerns about SMA safety and potential liability often led them to discourage SMA. Nonetheless, participants acknowledged three areas where providers played a role in SMA: providing information, dispensing medication, and providing support (i.e., managing pain). Pharmacy workers and local providers shared information with abortion seekers on pathways to access SMA care. Some community health workers directed clients to pharmacies, but more often only provided SMA information and support. Despite provider concerns, support for and pathways to SMA exist in India. Understanding the dynamics of provider perspectives and roles can inform improvements to comprehensive reproductive health policies and programmes in order to promote person-centred abortion care - including SMA - and address provider concerns. Synergies are needed between the formal health sector and SMA support networks to advance person experiences and reinforce quality abortion care as a human right.


  • Open Access

    One Health Integration to Control and Prevent Zoonoses: Application of Organizational Theory Literature

    by OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Lisset Dumet Poma, Sherril Gelmon, Julia Goodman, Seth O'NEal

    Zoonoses are infectious diseases transmitted between animals and people that disproportionately affect low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The One Health (OH) approach aims to integrate systems, incentivizing collaboration among animal, human, and environmental systems to address zoonoses and improve health. Innovative solutions for effectively and sustainably achieving systems integration are needed. Organizational theories can facilitate the study of the context of OH implementation, applying comprehensive approaches that recognize the interconnections among organisms, the environment, and social systems, including the diverse entities needing integration (e.g., policy, community, public organizations). This narrative review examines organization and systems literature to provide recommendations for studying the context of OH implementation and integration solutions with implications for research in LMICs. First, we review the concepts of complexity and systems thinking. We describe contingency theory and open systems theory, including the concepts of differentiation and fragmentation, to explain the influence of the environment on the structures of organizations involved in OH implementation. The sociological aspect of organizations is introduced with institutional theory, and recommendations of integration mechanisms for OH are summarized. Finally, we explain the concept of governance for health and provide recommendations for the application of governance theories in the context of LMICs.


  • Open Access

    Learning from employer experiences with paid leave policy expansions during the COVID-19 pandemic

    by William H Dow, Julia M Goodman, Paloma Lin, Paige Park

    The United States does not have a federal policy offering employees paid leave. We study employer attitudes toward the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) federal emergency paid leave policies temporarily adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic to draw lessons for proposed permanent federal paid leave policies. We analyzed a 2021 survey of 300 San Francisco Bay Area employers to examine employers’ experiences with paid sick leave (PSL) and paid family leave (PFL) policies during the COVID-19 pandemic, along with their attitudes regarding FFCRA paid leave. Most firms reported that it was not difficult to comply with or seek reimbursement for FFCRA leave. Nevertheless, most smaller firms did report difficulty in understanding policy details, and many reported being unaware of FFCRA paid leave availability. FFCRA paid leave was broadly popular among firms aware of it: 64% supported (9% opposed) the PSL provisions, and 52% supported (12% opposed) PFL. However, support for permanent extension dropped to just over 40%, despite this Bay Area sample having long familiarity with California's state paid leave policies. We conclude that federal pandemic paid leave offers a potential model that could be refined for future paid leave policies, but support is mixed.


  • Open Access

    Breastfeeding among women employed in Mexico’s informal sector: strategies to overcome key barriers

    by Julia M. Goodman, Vania Lara-Mejía, Sonia Hernández-Cordero, Mireya Vilar-Compte

    Background: Rates of exclusive breastfeeding fall below recommended levels, particularly among women in paid employment. In Mexico, more than half of women are in informal employment, meaning they lack many of the protections that may support breastfeeding. Methods: In-depth interviews with 15 key informants representing government agencies (n = 6 organizations), NGOs (n = 4), international organizations (n = 2), and academia (n = 2) in Mexico. Interviews were conducted between March and June 2023. To understand and describe barriers to breastfeeding among informally employed women in Mexico according to key informants and the current and potential policies to address these barriers, we conducted a qualitative thematic analysis. Results: Current policies to promote, protect, and support breastfeeding predominantly apply to all employed women, but respondents expressed concern that they did not provide adequate protection for women in informal employment. Additional themes concerned the need for relevant programs to be institutionalized and coordinated, discussions of breastfeeding as a right, and the legal equivalence (whether true in practice or not) of formal and informal workers. Conclusions: Women employed in Mexico’s informal sector face a dearth of maternity protections. According to key informants, few policies exist to promote, protect, and support breastfeeding among employed women, in general, but the economic vulnerability and challenging working conditions of women in informal employment exacerbates their situation. The lack of access to formal labor protections, such as paid maternity leave, creates a significant barrier to breastfeeding for women in the informal sector. Recommendations include short-term policies to fill gaps in social protection for informally employed women, as well as longer-term solutions such as the development of universal social protection programs and supporting formalization.


  • “How Do I Prepare for This?” Patient Perspectives on Providers’ Employment-related Support During Pregnancy

    by Julia M. Goodman, Annette M. Crawford, Erika K. Cottrell, Jeanne-Marie Guise


  • Client-reported quality of facility-managed medication abortion compared with pharmacy-sourced self-managed abortion in Bangladesh

    by Laura E Jacobson, Sarah E Baum, Erin Pearson, Rezwana Chowdhury, Nirali M Chakraborty, Julia M Goodman, Caitlin Gerdts, Blair G Darney

    Objective We used the newly developed Abortion Care Quality Tool (ACQTool) to compare client-reported quality of medication abortion care by source (facility-managed vs pharmacy-sourced self-managed abortion (SMA)) in Bangladesh. Methods We leveraged exit and 30-day follow-up surveys collected to develop and validate the ACQTool collected at nongovernmental organisation (NGO)-supported or -operated facilities in the public and private sector and pharmacies from three districts in Bangladesh. We used bivariate statistics to compare 18 client-reported quality indicators grouped in six domains and eight abortion outcomes, by source (facility vs pharmacy). We used multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with selected quality indicators and outcomes (abortion affordability, information provision, and knowing what to do for an adverse event), controlling for client sociodemographic characteristics. Results Of 550 abortion clients, 146 (26.5%) received a facility-managed medication abortion and 404 (73.5%) had a pharmacy-sourced SMA. Clients reported higher quality in facilities for five indicators, and higher in pharmacies for two indicators; the remaining 11 indicators were not different by source. Compared with facility-based clients, pharmacy clients had higher odds of reporting that the cost of abortion was affordable (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.55; 95% CI 2.27 to 5.58) but lower odds of reporting high information provision (aOR 0.14; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.23). Seven of eight abortion outcomes showed no differences; pharmacy clients had lower odds of knowing what to do if an adverse event occurred (aOR 0.45; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.82). Conclusions In Bangladesh, there is no difference in client-reported quality of medication abortion care between health facilities and pharmacies for the majority of quality and outcome indicators. However, information provision and preparedness were higher quality at facilities, while pharmacies were more affordable.


  • Open Access

    Racial/ethnic and gender inequities in the sufficiency of paid leave during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from the service sector

    by Julia M. Goodman, Daniel Schneider

    Background: Access to paid family and medical leave (PFML), including leave to care for a seriously ill loved one or recover from one's own serious illness, conveys health and economic benefits for workers and their families. However, without a national PFML policy, access to paid leave remains limited and unequal. Previous work documenting inequitable access by socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity primarily focuses on parental leave, measures theoretical access to paid leave rather than actual leave uptake, and lacks an accounting for why workers of color and women may have less access to PFML. We extend this literature by looking at leave‐taking for medical needs or caregiving among a high‐risk population during the COVID‐19 pandemic.Methods: We draw on data from 2595 service‐sector workers surveyed by the Shift Project in 2020 and 2021 to estimate inequities in leave uptake among workers who experienced qualifying events. We then estimate the relative importance of worker demographic characteristics, qualifying event types (medical vs. caregiving leave), proxies for access to state and employer PFML policies, job characteristics, and ultimately within‐firm differences to these gaps.Results: Overall, one‐fifth of workers reported sufficient leave. Women are significantly more likely than men to report insufficient or no leave. Hispanic and Black workers are more likely to take insufficient or no leave, respectively, but these differences were attenuated when controlling for covariates.Conclusions: The dearth of PFML laws leaves women and workers of color without access to leave that is paid and of sufficient duration when facing a qualifying event.