Carmine Attanasi

Carmine Attanasi

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Carmine Attanasi has a total of 23 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Web Axillary Pain Syndrome—Literature Evidence and Novel Rehabilitative Suggestions: A Narrative Review

    by Francesco Agostini, Carmine Attanasi, Andrea Bernetti, Massimiliano Mangone, Marco Paoloni, Edoardo del Monte, Massimo Mammucari, Enrica Maggiori, Domenico Russo, Raffaele Di Marzo, et al.

    Axillary web syndrome (AWS) is defined as a visible and palpable network of cords in the skin of the axillary cavity that are tensed by shoulder abduction following surgery for breast cancer, causing significant functional limits of the ipsilateral upper limb (UL) and pain. The purpose of this narrative review is to discuss rehabilitation approaches for greater efficacy with respect to pain and novel suggestions. AWS is a frequent complication of axillary lymphadenectomy that necessitates a thorough follow-up in the medium to long term. Physiotherapy is effective in the treatment of functional limb deficits, the management of pain, and the treatment of upper limb disability. The best management approach involves the use of soft tissue techniques to slow the natural course of the syndrome, in association with therapeutic exercises for functional recovery and muscle strengthening. AWS is linked secondary lymphedema, requiring integration with manual lymphatic drainage. The physiotherapy management of AWS is currently fragmented, and insufficient information is available on the nature of the disease. Thus, randomized and controlled studies that compare rehabilitation approaches in AWS are desirable, including the possibility of using mesotherapy in the treatment of axillary and upper limb pain.


  • Open Access

    Chronic low back pain and postural rehabilitation exercise: a literature review

    by Teresa Paolucci, Carmine Attanasi, Walter Cecchini, Alessandra Marazzi, Serena V Capobianco, Valter Santilli

    Chronic low back pain and postural rehabilitation exercise: a literature review Teresa Paolucci,1 Carmine Attanasi,1 Walter Cecchini,2 Alessandra Marazzi,2 Serena V Capobianco,1 Valter Santilli1 1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Policlinico Universitario Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy; 2Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, S. Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy Chronic low back represents one of the major causes of disability worldwide. Our narrative review has the purpose of highlighting the evidence supporting the different rehabilitative techniques described for its management. In total, 26 studies were found suitable to be included in the review (14 articles about pilates, six about McKenzie (MK), one article about Feldenkrais, three about Global Postural Rehabilitation (GPR) and two about Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation). The effect of exercise therapy was examined for each single study through changes in the main clinical outcomes (pain, disability,) quality of life (QoL) and psychological aspects and the targeted aspects of physical function (muscle strength, mobility, muscular activity and flexibility). All the techniques are effective for the study groups with respect to the control groups in reducing pain and disability and improving the QoL and maintaining benefits at follow-up; pilates, Back School, MK and Feldenkrais methods reduce pain and are more efficient than a pharmacological or instrumental approach in reducing disability and improving all psychological aspects also. GPR shows long lasting results for the last outcome. To date, it is difficult to affirm the superiority of one approach over another. Further high quality research is needed to confirm the effect of these techniques, together with the use of more appropriate evaluation measures. Keywords: chronic low back pain, aspecific chronic low back pain, McKenzie, Global Postural Rehabilitation, pilates, Feldenkrais, Alexander method, Mézières, Souchard


  • Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Therapy for Supraspinatus Calcifying Tendinitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Different Energy Levels

    by Francesco Ioppolo, Maria Tattoli, Luca Di Sante, Carmine Attanasi, Teresa Venditto, Marila Servidio, Angelo Cacchio, Valter Santilli

    Background: Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy (ESWT) represents a valid intervention in the treatment of people with supraspinatus calcifying tendinitis (SCT), but there is limited evidence for the useful range of ESWT doses.Objective: The aim of this study was to compare 2 different ranges of energy flux density in treatment of SCT with ESWT.Design: This study was designed as a single-blind randomized clinical trial.Setting: This study was performed in a university hospital.Patients: Forty-six patients with SCT were randomly assigned to 2 groups that received different therapeutic energy doses of ESWT: (1) group A received ESWT at an energy level of 0.20 mJ/mm2, and (2) group B received ESWT at an energy level of 0.10 mJ/mm2.Intervention: The treatment protocol consisted of 4 sessions performed once a week.Measurements: The change in mean Constant Murley Scale (CMS) scores at 3 and 6 months was the primary endpoint. The change in the mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores from baseline to 3 and 6 months after the intervention and radiographic change in size of calcium deposits were evaluated as secondary endpoints. At 12 months, pain relief was assessed using a numeric rating scale.Results: Significant clinical improvement based on mean CMS scores was observed after 6 months in group A (X̅=79.43, SD=10.33) compared with group B (X̅=57.91, SD=6.53). Likewise, after 6 months, a significant decrease in VAS scores was found in group A (X̅=2.09, SD=1.54) compared with group B (X̅=5.36, SD=0.78). Calcific deposits disappeared in the same percentage of patients in both groups.Limitations: The small sample size and lack of a control group were limitations of the study.Conclusions: In ESWT for SCT, an energy level of 0.20 mJ/mm2 appears to be more effective than an energy level of 0.10 mJ/mm2 in pain relief and functional improvement.