Andrea Lavorato
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Andrea Lavorato has a total of 23 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Diego Garbossa
OU Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
4 shared publicationsFabio Cofano
Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Corso Bramante 88/90, 10126, Turin, Italy
4 shared publicationsFrancesca Vincitorio
OU Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
3 shared publications- Paolo Titolo
UOD Reconstructive Microsurgery, Department of Orthopedics & Traumatology, Hospital “Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino”, 10126 Turin, Italy
3 shared publications Bruno Battiston
OU Traumatology-Reconstructive Microsurgery, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, CTO Hospital, Torino, Italy
2 shared publicationsPaolo Titolo
Traumatology–Reconstructive Microsurgery, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, CTO Hospital, 10126 Turin, TO, Italy
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 8 January 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Vol. 22 (2) , 572
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Treatment Perspectives in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: Systematic Review
Traumatic peripheral nerve lesions affect hundreds of thousands of patients every year; their consequences are life-altering and often devastating and cause alterations in movement and sensitivity. Spontaneous peripheral nerve recovery is often inadequate. In this context, nowadays, cell therapy represents one of the most innovative approaches in the field of nerve repair therapies. The purpose of this systematic review is to discuss the features of different types of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) relevant for peripheral nerve regeneration after nerve injury. The published literature was reviewed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A combination of the keywords “nerve regeneration”, “stem cells”, “peripheral nerve injury”, “rat”, and “human” were used. Additionally, a “MeSH” research was performed in PubMed using the terms “stem cells” and “nerve regeneration”. The characteristics of the most widely used MSCs, their paracrine potential, targeted stimulation, and differentiation potentials into Schwann-like and neuronal-like cells are described in this paper. Considering their ability to support and stimulate axonal growth, their remarkable paracrine activity, their presumed differentiation potential, their extremely low immunogenicity, and their high survival rate after transplantation, ADSCs appear to be the most suitable and promising MSCs for the recovery of peripheral nerve lesion. Clinical considerations are finally reported.
- 8 January 2021
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Vol. 22 (2) , 572
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessMesenchymal Stem Cell Treatment Perspectives in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: Systematic Review
Traumatic peripheral nerve lesions affect hundreds of thousands of patients every year; their consequences are life-altering and often devastating and cause alterations in movement and sensitivity. Spontaneous peripheral nerve recovery is often inadequate. In this context, nowadays, cell therapy represents one of the most innovative approaches in the field of nerve repair therapies. The purpose of this systematic review is to discuss the features of different types of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) relevant for peripheral nerve regeneration after nerve injury. The published literature was reviewed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A combination of the keywords “nerve regeneration”, “stem cells”, “peripheral nerve injury”, “rat”, and “human” were used. Additionally, a “MeSH” research was performed in PubMed using the terms “stem cells” and “nerve regeneration”. The characteristics of the most widely used MSCs, their paracrine potential, targeted stimulation, and differentiation potentials into Schwann-like and neuronal-like cells are described in this paper. Considering their ability to support and stimulate axonal growth, their remarkable paracrine activity, their presumed differentiation potential, their extremely low immunogenicity, and their high survival rate after transplantation, ADSCs appear to be the most suitable and promising MSCs for the recovery of peripheral nerve lesion. Clinical considerations are finally reported.
- 1 September 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
- Vol. 196, 106041
TRANS-FRONTAL SINUS APPROACH FOR OLFACTORY GROOVE MENINGIOMAS: A 19 YEAR EXPERIENCE
- 1 September 2020
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
- Vol. 196, 106041
TRANS-FRONTAL SINUS APPROACH FOR OLFACTORY GROOVE MENINGIOMAS: A 19 YEAR EXPERIENCE
- 1 July 2020
- Published by Elsevier in World Neurosurgery
- Vol. 139, 712-713
Letter to the Editor Regarding “Opinion Piece: Microsurgery in COVID-19–Positive Patients”
- 1 July 2020
- Published by Elsevier in World Neurosurgery
- Vol. 139, 712-713
Letter to the Editor Regarding “Opinion Piece: Microsurgery in COVID-19–Positive Patients”
- 1 March 2019
- Published by Elsevier in World Neurosurgery
- Vol. 123, 212-215
Intraneural Ewing Sarcoma of Fibular Nerve: Case Report, Radiologic Findings and Review of Literature
- 1 March 2019
- Published by Elsevier in World Neurosurgery
- Vol. 123, 212-215
Intraneural Ewing Sarcoma of Fibular Nerve: Case Report, Radiologic Findings and Review of Literature