Yaron Rudnicki

Background: Subtotal colectomy (STC) with end ileostomy (EI) is usually the first surgical stage for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who fail medical treatment, most often with biological agents. Is there a difference in surgical outcome after failure of one or two biologicals vs. three or four? Methods: A retrospective study of all patients who underwent STC with EI for UC (5-2018 to 1-2022). After excluding emergent cases, the elective cohort was divided into patients who failed 1–2 biologicals (group 1–2) vs. patients who failed 3–4 biologicals (group 3–4), and surgical outcomes were compared. Data collected included patients’ demographics, preoperative clinical manifestations, and operative and postoperative outcomes. Results: Ninety-eight patients underwent STC for UC, and of them, 53 were elective. Thirty patients failed 1–2 biologics (group 1–2), and 23 failed 3–4 biologics (group 3–4). The groups were similar in average age (37.6 ± 11 vs. 32.7 ± 10), BMI (26.7 ± 6 vs. 27.7 ± 7), number of years with UC (9.5 ± 9 vs. 9 ± 8), rate of steroid dependence (20 (67%) vs. 13 (57%)) but differed in sex; there were 25 (83%) males in group 1–2, and 8 (35%) in group 3–4 (p < 0.01). The operative approaches were similar, as was the operative time (217 ± 74 vs. 210 ± 79 min). The length of hospital stay was 3.2 ± 1 days for group 1–2 and 5 ± 6 days for group 3–4 (p = 0.14). Postoperative complications were seen in 10 patients (33%) vs. 7 patients (30%) (p = 0.82), and of them, two (7%) and two (9%) (p = 0.82) had Venous thromboembolism (VTE), respectively. Only 20 patients (67%) in group 1–2 and 16 patients (70%) in group 3–4 (p = 0.82) progressed to a second stage of an Ileoanal pouch (IPAA) at 11.1 ± 4 and 9.2 ± 2 months, respectively. The overall average follow-up time was 41.1 months. Conclusions: Ulcerative Colitis patients who fail 3–4 biological agents and choose to go to elective STC with EI have very similar surgical outcomes compared to patients who choose elective surgery after failing only 1–2 biological agents in the same time span of known disease. UC patients with severe colitis and poor quality of life who fail two lines of biological agents may be better off electing surgical treatment than failing more biologics and then going to surgery. On the other hand, patients who try 3–4 biologics may expect no worse surgical outcomes than after 1–2 biologics.

Background: Antibiotic discordance in patients undergoing percutaneous cholecystostomy (PCC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) remains a debated issue. While empiric therapy aims to cover the most common pathogens, source control via PCC may play a greater role in clinical outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of discordant antibiotic treatment on patient outcomes. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study analyzed 184 PCC procedures performed for AC between 2018 and 2020. Patient demographics, bile cultures, empirical antibiotic regimens, and clinical outcomes were analyzed, with a focus on the impact of discordant antibiotic coverage. Results: Of the 184 PCC patients, 128 (69.5%) had positive bile cultures, with Escherichia coli (34%), Enterococcus (24%), and Klebsiella (14%) being the most common pathogens. Resistant bacteria were identified in 28% of patients. Despite 42% (n = 78) receiving discordant antibiotics, there were no significant differences in mortality, complications, or length of hospital stay between the discordant and concordant groups. However, the 90-day readmission rate was significantly higher in the discordant group (64.1% vs. 47.2%, p = 0.023). Conclusions: Although discordant antibiotic treatment did not impact short-term outcomes, it was associated with a significantly higher rate of readmission. These findings suggest that PCC may be the primary driver of acute management; however, inadequate antimicrobial coverage might influence long-term recurrence.

Aim: Crohn's disease (CD) is regarded as a wasting disease, yet there is a growing population of CD patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 35 and above. The rate of postoperative complications is relatively high in CD patients but might be even higher in CD with morbid obesity (MO).Methods: This was a retrospective study using a prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing Ileocolic resection for CD between 2014 and 2021 in two referral centres, comparing postoperative complication rates according to BMI.Results: Three hundred and forty‐six patients were identified. Sixty patients (17%) had a BMI over 30 kg/m², and 28 (8.1%) had a BMI of over 35 kg/m² (>35 group). The BMI >35 group had more women (78.6% vs. 52%, P < 0.1), a higher rate of patients not receiving an anastomosis (7.1% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.02), a higher rate of any postoperative surgical complication (32.1% vs. 25.2%, P = 0.4), with a higher rate of Clavien–Dindo ≥3 (14.3% vs. 7.2%, P = 0.25), a higher rate of stoma creation on reoperation for complications (7.2% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.04), a higher rate of 30‐day readmission due to intra‐abdominal abscess (10.7% vs. 4.7%, P = 0.2), but a lower rate of postoperative medical complications (3.6% vs. 15.7%, P < 0.01).Conclusions: The rate of MO among CD patients requiring ileocolonic resection is on the rise. MO in this setting is associated with statistically non‐significant increases in all surgical complications, severe complications, readmission, and a higher chance for a bailout stoma creation upon reoperation. However, MO seems to be a protective factor for medical postoperative complications, which might suggest better nutritional status.

Background: Local surgical excision of T1 rectal adenocarcinoma is a well-established approach. Yet, there are still open questions regarding the recurrence rates and its risk factors. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study including all patients who underwent local excision of early rectal cancer with an open or MIS approach and had a T1 lesion from 2010 to 2020 in six academic centers. Data included demographics, preoperative studies, surgical findings, postoperative outcomes, and local and systemic recurrence. A univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for recurrence. Results: Overall, 274 patients underwent local excision of rectal lesions. Of them, 97 (35.4%) patients with a T1 lesion were included in the cohort. The mean age was 69 ± 10.5 years, and 42 (43.3%) were female. The mean distance of the lesions from the anal verge was 7.8 ± 3.2 cm, and the average tumor size was 2.7 ± 1.6 cm. Eighty-two patients (85%) had a full-thickness resection. Eight patients (8%) had postoperative complications. Kikuchi classification of submucosal (SM) involvement was reported in 29 (30%) patients. Twelve patients had SM1, two SM2, and fifteen SM3. Following pathology, 24 patients (24.7%) returned for additional surgery or treatment. The overall recurrence rate was 14.4% (14 patients), with 11 patients having a local recurrence and 6 having a systemic metastatic recurrence, 3 of which had both. The mean time for recurrence was 2.78 ± 2.8 years and the overall mortality rate was 11%. On univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis of recurrence vs. non-recurrence groups, the strongest and most significant association and possible risk factors for recurrence were larger lesions (4.3 vs. 2.5 cm, p < 0.001) with an OR of 6.67 (CI—1.82–24.36), especially for tumors larger than 3.5 cm, mucinous histology (14.3% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.004, OR of 14.02, CI—1.13–173.85), and involved margins (41.7% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.003, OR of 9.59, CI—2.14–43.07). The open transanal excision (TAE) approach was also identified as a possible significant risk factor in univariant analysis, while SM3 level penetration showed only a trend. Conclusion: Surgical local excision of T1 rectal malignancy is a safe and viable option. Still, one in four patients received additional treatment. There is an almost 15% chance for recurrence, especially in large tumors, mucinous histology, or involved margin cases. These high-risk patients might warrant additional intervention and stricter surveillance protocols.

Purpose Appendiceal stump leak rate after laparoscopic appendectomy is extremely low. Various methods are used to close the appendiceal stump. This study aimed to compare the outcome of three appendiceal stump closure methods. Methods A retrospective study comparing stump closure methods and postoperative outcomes was conducted from January 2018 to June 2020. Patient data included demographics, pre-operative data, surgical technique, findings, and postoperative complications. Results Out of 1021 appendectomy patients, 733 underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis utilizing one of the three compared appendiceal stump closure methods. Consequently, 360 appendixes were ligated with one endoloop (1EL group), 300 appendixes had two endoloops (2EL group), and 73 appendixes were ligated with two endoclips (2EC group). All groups used a LigaSure for resection. The rate of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess was 1% (4 patients) in 1EL group vs. 1% (3 patients) in 2EL group vs. none in 2EC group (p = 0.43). There were no reported appendiceal stump leaks. Overall complication rates were 4% (14 patients), 3% (9 patients), and 0 (p = 0.15), and the mean operative length was 43 ± 21, 54 ± 22, and 43 ± 20 mins for the 1EL, 2EL, and 2EC, respectively (p < 0.01). Average cost of one endoloop is 110$, and one endoclip cartridge is 180$. Conclusions None of the methods were found clinically superior over the others. Considering the low and mild complication rate, it appears reasonable to prefer one method simply by cost. The use of a single endoloop may result in substantial cost reduction. Medical centers may advise surgeons to use a single-endoloop technique.

Introduction: Synchronous robotic colorectal and liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is gaining popularity. This case series describes our initial institutional experience. Methods: A retrospective study of synchronous robotic colorectal and liver resections for metastatic colorectal cancer (March 2020 to December 2021). Results: Eight patients underwent synchronous robotic resections. The median age was 59 (45–72), and the median body mass index was 29 (20–33). Seven received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and five rectal cancers received neoadjuvant radiotherapy. One patient had a low anterior resection with major hepatectomy, two had low anterior resection with minor hepatectomy, and one had abdominoperineal resection with major hepatectomy. One patient had a left colectomy with minor hepatectomy, and two had right colectomies with minor hepatectomy. We used five robotic 8/12 mm ports in all cases. Extraction incisions were Pfannenstiel in four patients, colostomy site in two patients, one perineal incision, and one supra-umbilical incision. The median estimated blood loss was 200 mL (25–500), and the median operative time was 448 min (374–576). There were no intra-operative complications or conversions. Five patients had the liver resection first, and two of six anastomoses were performed before the liver resection. The Median length of stay was 4 days (3–14). There were two post-operative complications, prolonged ileus and DVT, with a Clavien-Dindo complication grade of I and II, respectively. There were no readmissions or reoperations. All colorectal and liver resection margins were negative. Conclusions: Synchronous robotic colorectal and liver resection can be performed effectively utilizing one port configuration with acceptable short-term outcomes and quality of oncologic resection.

Background: As the population ages emergency surgeries among the elderly population, including colonic resections, is also increasing. Data regarding the short- and long-term outcomes in this population is scarce. Methods: A retrospective study was performed to investigate mortality and mortality risk factors associated with emergent colectomies in older compared to younger patients in a single university affiliated tertiary hospital. Patients with metastatic disease, colectomy due to trauma or index colectomy within 30 days prior to emergent surgery were excluded. Results: Operative outcomes compared among age groups, included 30-day mortality, mortality risk-factors and long-term survival. 613 eligible patients were included in the cohort. Mean age was 69.4 years, 45.1% were female. Patients were divided into four age groups: 18–59, 60–69, 70–79 and ≥80-years. Thirty-day mortality rates were 3.2%, 11%, 29.3% and 37.8%, respectively and 22% for the entire cohort. Risk-factors for perioperative death in the younger group were related to severity of ASA score and WBC count. In groups 60–69, 70–79, main risk-factors were ADL dependency and ASA score. In the ≥80 group, risk-factors affecting perioperative mortality, included ASA score, pre-operative albumin, creatinine, WBC levels, cancer etiology, ADL dependency, and dementia. Long-term survival differed significantly between age groups. Conclusion: Perioperative mortality with emergency colectomy increases with patients’ age. Patients older than eighty-years undergoing urgent colectomies have extremely high mortality rates, leading to a huge burden on medical services. Evaluating risk-factors for mortality and pre-operative discussion with patients and families is important. Screening the elderly population for colonic pathologies can result in early diagnosis potentially leading to elective surgeries with decreased mortality.

Aim: Perianal Paget's disease (PAPD) is a rare disorder with a predisposition to anal and colorectal malignancies and an unclear prognosis. Our previous 25‐year series demonstrated a non‐aggressive nature. This study aims to describe our updated institutional experience.Methods: This is a retrospective review of all patients diagnosed with primary PAPD from 1991 to 2021. A prospectively maintained institutional database was searched which included demographics, clinical and pathological manifestations, treatment methods, recurrence, oncological outcome and mortality.Results: Thirty patients were diagnosed with PAPD. Fifteen were women (50%); the average age at diagnosis was 71 ± 10.7 years, and the average lesion size was 3.7 ± 2.6 cm. At diagnosis, 12 (40%) were harbouring invasive anal adenocarcinoma. Eight (27%) developed adenocarcinomas concurrent with PAPD recurrence at a mean interval of 9 ± 4.4 years (range 1.9–14.8). The Kaplan–Meier curve estimated overall survival of 93%, 86%, 82%, 65% and 56% at 1, 3, 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Median survival was 16 years. Six (20%) had disease‐related mortality. Initially, nine (30%) were treated with abdominoperineal resection (APR), 15 (50%) underwent local resection, three (10%) were treated with radiotherapy, two (7%) received only topical therapy and one (3%) chose observation. Fifteen (50%) experienced recurrence of PAPD, two after undergoing APR. Five (17%) had persistent disease until death. Only 10 (33%) did not experience PAPD recurrence, seven of whom underwent APR. The mean follow‐up time was 9.2 ± 6.2 years.Conclusions: Perianal Paget's disease is an aggressive entity with high rates of synchronous anal adenocarcinoma at diagnosis and development of metachronous adenocarcinoma later in life.

Purpose: Rectal polyps with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) can be removed by local excision surgery (LE). It is unclear whether these lesions pose a higher risk for recurrence and cancer development and might warrant an early repeat rectal endoscopy. This study aims to assess the rectal cancer rate following local excision of LGD rectal lesions. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study including all patients that underwent LE for rectal polyps over a period of 11 years was conducted. Demographic, clinical, and surgical data of patients with LGD werecollected and analyzed. Results: Out of 274 patients that underwent LE of rectal lesions, 81 (30%) had a pathology of LGD. The mean patient age was 65 ± 11 years, and 52 (64%) were male. The mean distance from the anal verge was 7.2 ± 4.3 cm, and the average lesion was 3.2 ± 1.8 cm. Full thickness resection was achieved in 68 patients (84%), and four (5%) had involved margins for LGD. Nine patients (11%) had local recurrence and developed rectal cancer in an average time interval of 19.3 ± 14.5 months, with seven of them (78%) diagnosed less than two years after the initial LE. Seven of the nine patients were treated with another local excision, whilst one had a low anterior resection, and one was treated with radiation. The mean follow-up time was 25.3 ± 22.4 months. Conclusions: Locally resected rectal polyps with LGD may carry a significant risk of recurring and developing cancer within two years. This data suggests patients should have a closer surveillance protocol in place.

Background: Renal transplant patients presenting with diverticulitis remain a clinical challenge for health care professionals. Secondary to immunosuppression, renal transplant recipients are often considered for early operative intervention due to concerns for an unreliable physical exam and feared morbidity and mortality associated with non-operative management. Methods: This study aimed to evaluate trends in management of renal transplant patients with diverticulitis at a quaternary referral center. Results: One hundred ninety-one renal transplant patients admitted to the hospital with diverticulitis were identified. Of this cohort, 71 (37%) underwent surgical resection, of which 20 (28%) were performed emergently. The overall 30-day operative mortality was 8% (6/71), of which there was a significant difference between emergent (25%, 5/20) and elective (2%, 1/51) groups ( P = .006). Patients who underwent elective surgery were more likely to receive a minimally invasive approach (51%) and were significantly more likely to undergo stoma reversal ( P = .006). Discussion: Our study shows that not all renal transplants with diverticulitis will require operative intervention and many can be safely treated non-operatively. Elective resection and surgical management should be considered on an individual basis. Patients treated with elective resection were more likely to undergo a minimally invasive approach and restoration of intestinal continuity.