Joseph Arturo Reza

Objective: To evaluate the adoption and clinical impact of endoscopic resection (ER) in early esophageal cancer. Background: Staging for early esophageal cancer is largely inaccurate. Assessment of the impact of ER on staging accuracy is unknown, as is the implementation of ER. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 2608 patients captured in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database between 2015 and 2020. Patients with clinical T1 and T2 esophageal cancer without nodal involvement (N0) who were treated with upfront esophagectomy were included. Staging accuracy was assessed by clinical-pathologic concordance among patients staged with and without ER. We also sought to measure adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network staging guidelines for esophageal cancer staging, specifically the implementation of ER. Results: For early esophageal cancer, computed tomography/positron emission tomography/endoscopic ultrasound (CT/PET/EUS) accurately predicts the pathologic tumor (T) stage 58.5% of the time. The addition of ER to staging was related to a decrease in upstaging from 17.6% to 10.8% (P=0.01). Adherence to staging guidelines with CT/PET/EUS improved from 58.2% between 2012 and 2014 to 77.9% between 2015 and 2020. However, when ER was added as a staging criterion, adherence decreased to 23.3%. Increased volume of esophagectomies within an institution was associated with increased staging adherence with ER (P=0.008). Conclusions: The use of CT/PET/EUS for the staging of early esophageal cancer is accurate in only 56.3% of patients. ER may increase staging accuracy as it is related to a decrease in upstaging. ER is poorly utilized in staging of early esophageal cancer. Barriers to the implementation of ER as a staging modality should be identified and corrected.

Objective: Surgical repair of paraesophageal hernias in patients with hostile abdomen is challenging. Despite its utility as an open procedure, the adoption of the minimally invasive Belsey Mark IV procedure has been limited because of the complexity of using traditional video-assisted thoracoscopic instrumentation. The robotic platform offers additional degrees of freedom, which enables minimally invasive transthoracic approach despite challenging anatomy. The purpose of this article is to describe a technique of robotic approach for the Belsey Mark IV operation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 5 cases of the robotic Belsey Mark IV procedure completed at a single institution between June 2018 and November 2021. Data were collected from a review of the medical records, including operative reports, anesthesia records, imaging, and clinical notes. The operative technique is described in the present article. There were 4 men and 1 woman. The average age of the patients was 64.4 ± 13.6 years, with an average body mass index of 24.5 kg/m². Three patients had undergone previous transabdominal hiatal hernia repair, and 2 of them had 2 prior repairs. One patient underwent simultaneous pulmonary left lower lobectomy for cancer with the Belsey Mark IV procedure. Results: The average operative time was 209 ± 95 min (110 to 360 min). The average postoperative length of stay was 4.2 days, and 2 patients experienced complications including bleeding and persistent air leak (after lobectomy). The average blood loss was 67 ± 25 mL. Conclusions: The robotic platform enables a transthoracic minimally invasive approach to the Belsey Mark IV operation.

Toy E, et al. J Endocr Surg. 2021 Mar;21(1):38-40. https://doi.org/10.16956/jes.2021.21.1.38

Background: Despite numerous discoveries regarding the molecular genesis and progression of primary cancers, the biology of metastasis remains poorly understood. Compared to very large numbers of circulating tumor cells that are now known to accompany nearly all cancers, a relatively limited number of lesions actually develop in most patients with metastases. We hypothesized that phenotypic changes driven by differential gene expression in a finite subpopulation of tumor cells render those cells capable of metastasis and sought to identify key pathways through analysis of gene expression in primary and metastatic lesions from the same patients. Methods: We compared whole-genome expression in 4 matched samples of primary and metastatic sarcoma, then evaluated candidate genes with differential expression via quantitative PCR in 30 additional matched sets, tumor tissue immunostaining, siRNA loss-of-function in a sarcoma cell migration assay, and clinical correlation with overall and disease-free survival after metastasectomy. Results: Comparison of microarray signals identified differential expression of cell adhesion genes, including upregulation of KRT7 and MUC1 in metastases; KRT7 and MUC1 upregulation was confirmed in 22 (73%) and 20 (67%) matched sets of metastatic/primary tumors, respectively. Silencing of KRT7 and MUC1 via targeted siRNAs suppressed sarcoma cell migration in vitro, and a significant correlation (two-sided) was observed between both KRT7 and MUC1 expression in metastases and overall patient survival. Conclusion: KRT7 and MUC1 may play a significant role in enabling sarcoma metastasis, and they may therefore be important prognostic biomarkers as well as potential targets for therapeutic prevention of metastasis.

Reza JA, et al. J Endocr Surg. 2018 Dec;18(4):236-239. https://doi.org/10.16956/jes.2018.18.4.236