Cornelia Bär

Cornelia Bär

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Cornelia Bär has a total of 34 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Andrew J. Macpherson

    Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland

    1 shared publication
  • Antonia Matalas

    Department of Nutrition and Dietetics School of Health Sciences and Education Harokopio University Athens Greece

    1 shared publication
  • Anđela Vukojević

    Department of Neurobiology Institute for Biological Research "Sinisa Stankovic" National Institute of Republic of Serbia University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia

    1 shared publication
  • Arghya Mukherjee

    Department of Food Biosciences Teagasc Food Research Centre Fermoy Cork County Ireland

    1 shared publication
  • Aycan Yigit Cinar

    Department of Food Engineering Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences Bursa Technical University Bursa Türkiye

    1 shared publication
  • Bojana Vidović

    Department of Bromatology Faculty of Pharmacy University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    The effects of Lactobacillus and/or Bifidobacterium in fermented foods on cognitive health: a systematic review

    by Hayriye Harsa, Carmen González Domenech, Milica Prvulović, Zeynep Agirbasli, Erfan Bagherzadehsurbagh, Valentina Simeunović, Eleni Naziri, Elizabeth Adesemoye, Aycan Yigit Cinar, Arghya Mukherjee, et al.

    Background: Psychobiotics are microorganisms that modulate brain function via the gut–brain axis and are increasingly studied for their cognitive benefits. Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species, widely present in fermented foods, are considered safe and may influence cognition by modulating neuroinflammation, neurotransmitters, and gut barrier integrity. This systematic review examined the effects of foods fermented with these species on cognitive performance in healthy adults and individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Methods: We conducted the systematic review following EFSA guidelines, Cochrane methodology, and a PROSPERO protocol, using CADIMA for study selection and data extraction. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched (1 January 1970–31 August 2023) for human intervention and observational studies assessing cognitive outcomes after ingestion of foods fermented with Lactobacillus or Bifidobacterium . Eligible populations included healthy adults and individuals with mild cognitive impairment; studies involving disease were excluded. Screening, data extraction, and bias assessment followed Muka et al.’s 24-step guide using ROBINS and Cochrane/CADIMA frameworks. Evidence was synthesized narratively, while a non-systematic component examined food characteristics, potential mechanisms, and factors affecting bioavailability of bioactive constituents. Results: We included 21 studies (8 interventional, 13 observational). The majority of studies reported benefits, particularly in episodic memory, executive functions, and global cognition, but evidence was limited by inadequate controls, small sample sizes, short interventions, inconsistent domain assessment, and incomplete food characterization. Observational studies had larger populations and longer follow-ups but were limited by exposure assessment and depth of cognitive testing. Conclusion: Consumption of foods fermented with Lactobacillus and/or Bifidobacterium species may offer promising cognitive benefits. However, following EFSA’s guidance on the substantiation of health claims, the current evidence is “neither convincing nor sufficient” to establish a causal relationship. Well-designed studies with thorough product characterization are needed to substantiate effects and support potential health claims. Systematic review registration: This study was registered at the Open Science Framework ( 10.17605/OSF.IO/Z6GRW ).


  • Open Access

    In Silico Comparison Shows that the Pan-Genome of a Dairy-Related Bacterial Culture Collection Covers Most Reactions Annotated to Human Microbiomes

    by Thomas Roder, Daniel Wüthrich, Cornelia Bär, Zahra Sattari, Ueli von Ah, Francesca Ronchi, Andrew J. Macpherson, Stephanie C. Ganal-Vonarburg, Rémy Bruggmann, Guy Vergères

    The diversity of the human microbiome is positively associated with human health. However, this diversity is endangered by Westernized dietary patterns that are characterized by a decreased nutrient variety. Diversity might potentially be improved by promoting dietary patterns rich in microbial strains. Various collections of bacterial cultures resulting from a century of dairy research are readily available worldwide, and could be exploited to contribute towards this end. We have conducted a functional in silico analysis of the metagenome of 24 strains, each representing one of the species in a bacterial culture collection composed of 626 sequenced strains, and compared the pathways potentially covered by this metagenome to the intestinal metagenome of four healthy, although overweight, humans. Remarkably, the pan-genome of the 24 strains covers 89% of the human gut microbiome’s annotated enzymatic reactions. Furthermore, the dairy microbial collection covers biological pathways, such as methylglyoxal degradation, sulfate reduction, γ-aminobutyric (GABA) acid degradation and salicylate degradation, which are differently covered among the four subjects and are involved in a range of cardiometabolic, intestinal, and neurological disorders. We conclude that microbial culture collections derived from dairy research have the genomic potential to complement and restore functional redundancy in human microbiomes.