Tina A. Leone

OBJECTIVE: To compare proportions of target range tidal volumes achieved with the self-inflating bag vs. the T-piece in resuscitation of preterm newborns at delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary Children’s Hospital. 20 preterm infants≤32 weeks’ gestational age with no congenital anomalies who needed positive pressure ventilation after birth were enrolled. Positive pressure ventilation was provided with the self-inflating bag or T-piece resuscitator. The primary outcome was proportion of inflations within a target range of 4–8 ml/kg. Chi-square and logistical regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: In the self-inflating bag (SIB) group 29% of inflations (117/419) and in the T-Piece (TP) group 51% of inflations (300/590) delivered expiratory tidal volume (TVe) of 4–8 ml/kg (p < 65.001). In the SIB group 60% of all inflations (254/419), and in the TP group 35% of all inflations (204/590) delivered TVe < 4 ml/kg (p < 0.001). In the SIB group 11% of all inflations (48/419), and in the TP group, 15% of all inflations (86/590) delivered TVe > 8 ml/kg (p = 0.18). The OR of having expiratory tidal volume of 4–8 ml/kg using the T-piece was 1.8 (CI 1.1–3.1), p = 0.02. CONCLUSION: Manual inflations provided by the TP deliver expiratory tidal volumes in the range of 4–8 ml/kg more consistently than SIB.

Purpose of review: To discuss a structured training process that can be used to guide curricula development in procedural skills in neonatal perinatal medicine training programs. Recent findings: Achieving proficiency in life savings skills such as neonatal endotracheal intubation does not occur for all graduates of neonatal perinatal medicine programs. Innovations in procedural skills training offer opportunities to enhance the current educational environment and improve competency at all levels of learning. Summary: A deliberate process of planning for procedural skills training and assessment of training outcomes is essential to ensure competence among graduates and practicing clinicians.

Resuscitation guidelines are developed and revised by medical societies throughout the world. These guidelines are increasingly based on evidence from preclinical and clinical research. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation reviews evidence for each resuscitation practice and provides summary consensus statements that inform resuscitation guideline committees. A similar process is used for different populations including neonatal, pediatric, and adult resuscitation. The NeoHeart 2020 Conference brought together experts in resuscitation to discuss recent evidence and guidelines for resuscitation practices. This review summarizes the main focus of discussion from this symposium.