Rolf Larsson
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Rolf Larsson has a total of 25 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Shifteh Mobini
Division of Water Resources Engineering, Lund University. Lund, Sweden
4 shared publications - Per Becker
Division of Risk Management and Societal Safety, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
3 shared publications - Ronny Berndtsson
Division of Water Resources Engineering, Lund University
3 shared publications Andreas Persson
1 shared publication- Andreas Persson
Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
1 shared publication Antti Belinskij
Finnish Environment Institute SYKE, Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790, Helsinki, Finland
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 19 August 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Hydrology Research
- Vol. 53 (9) , 1166-1185
Coordination of water policies for quality and quantity: experiences from Nordic and Baltic countries
- 19 August 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Hydrology Research
- Vol. 53 (9) , 1166-1185
Open AccessCoordination of water policies for quality and quantity: experiences from Nordic and Baltic countries
- Open Access
- 6 June 2022
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
- Vol. 77
Urban flood damage claim analyses for improved flood damage assessment
- 6 June 2022
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
- Vol. 77
Open AccessUrban flood damage claim analyses for improved flood damage assessment
- Open Access
- 1 August 2021
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
- Vol. 62
Analysis of pluvial flood damage costs in residential buildings – A case study in Malmö
- 1 August 2021
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
- Vol. 62
Open AccessAnalysis of pluvial flood damage costs in residential buildings – A case study in Malmö
- Open Access
Systemic Inequity in Urban Flood Exposure and Damage Compensation
Urban flooding is a growing concern in Northern Europe. While all countries in this region invest substantial resources into urban flood risk management, all property owners have unequal opportunity to have their flood risk managed. This paper presents the notion of equity in the urban flood risk management, focusing on urban flood exposure and compensation after sewage surcharge on the 31 August 2014 cloudburst over Malmö in Sweden. All damage claims and the procedures assessing them were analysed based on the type of sewer system (combined or separated) that affected the properties. The results demonstrated considerable systemic inequity in both flood exposure and damage compensation. The owners of properties connected to combined systems were four times more likely to make a damage claim, while having their damage claims approved just over half as often, compared with owners of properties connected to separated sewage systems. Considering the multifaceted nature of both inequities and their possible resolution, current praxis is not sufficient for the management of future urban drainage systems; not only concerning changing climatic conditions but also concerning social conditions.
Open AccessSystemic Inequity in Urban Flood Exposure and Damage Compensation
Urban flooding is a growing concern in Northern Europe. While all countries in this region invest substantial resources into urban flood risk management, all property owners have unequal opportunity to have their flood risk managed. This paper presents the notion of equity in the urban flood risk management, focusing on urban flood exposure and compensation after sewage surcharge on the 31 August 2014 cloudburst over Malmö in Sweden. All damage claims and the procedures assessing them were analysed based on the type of sewer system (combined or separated) that affected the properties. The results demonstrated considerable systemic inequity in both flood exposure and damage compensation. The owners of properties connected to combined systems were four times more likely to make a damage claim, while having their damage claims approved just over half as often, compared with owners of properties connected to separated sewage systems. Considering the multifaceted nature of both inequities and their possible resolution, current praxis is not sufficient for the management of future urban drainage systems; not only concerning changing climatic conditions but also concerning social conditions.
- Open Access
A Simplified Model to Estimate the Concentration of Inorganic Ions and Heavy Metals in Rivers
This paper presents a model that uses only pH, alkalinity, and temperature to estimate the concentrations of major ions in rivers (Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, HCO3−, SO42−, Cl−, and NO3−) together with the equilibrium concentrations of minor ions and heavy metals (Fe3+, Mn2+, Cd2+, Cu2+, Al3+, Pb2+, and Zn2+). Mining operations have been increasing, which has led to changes in the pollution loads to receiving water systems, meanwhile most developing countries cannot afford water quality monitoring. A possible solution is to implement less resource-demanding monitoring programs, supported by mathematical models that minimize the required sampling and analysis, while still being able to detect water quality changes, thereby allowing implementation of measures to protect the water resources. The present model was developed using existing theories for: (i) carbonate equilibrium; (ii) total alkalinity; (iii) statistics of major ions; (iv) solubility of minerals; and (v) conductivity of salts in water. The model includes two options to estimate the concentrations of major ions: (1) a generalized method, which employs standard values from a world-wide data base; and (2) a customized method, which requires specific baseline data for the river of interest. The model was tested using data from four monitoring stations in Swedish rivers with satisfactory results.
Open AccessA Simplified Model to Estimate the Concentration of Inorganic Ions and Heavy Metals in Rivers
This paper presents a model that uses only pH, alkalinity, and temperature to estimate the concentrations of major ions in rivers (Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, HCO3−, SO42−, Cl−, and NO3−) together with the equilibrium concentrations of minor ions and heavy metals (Fe3+, Mn2+, Cd2+, Cu2+, Al3+, Pb2+, and Zn2+). Mining operations have been increasing, which has led to changes in the pollution loads to receiving water systems, meanwhile most developing countries cannot afford water quality monitoring. A possible solution is to implement less resource-demanding monitoring programs, supported by mathematical models that minimize the required sampling and analysis, while still being able to detect water quality changes, thereby allowing implementation of measures to protect the water resources. The present model was developed using existing theories for: (i) carbonate equilibrium; (ii) total alkalinity; (iii) statistics of major ions; (iv) solubility of minerals; and (v) conductivity of salts in water. The model includes two options to estimate the concentrations of major ions: (1) a generalized method, which employs standard values from a world-wide data base; and (2) a customized method, which requires specific baseline data for the river of interest. The model was tested using data from four monitoring stations in Swedish rivers with satisfactory results.
- Open Access
Re-Thinking Urban Flood Management—Time for a Regime Shift
Urban flooding is of growing concern due to increasing densification of urban areas, changes in land use, and climate change. The traditional engineering approach to flooding is designing single-purpose drainage systems, dams, and levees. These methods, however, are known to increase the long-term flood risk and harm the riverine ecosystems in urban as well as rural areas. In the present paper, we depart from resilience theory and suggest a concept to improve urban flood resilience. We identify areas where contemporary challenges call for improved collaborative urban flood management. The concept emphasizes resiliency and achieved synergy between increased capacity to handle stormwater runoff and improved experiential and functional quality of the urban environments. We identify research needs as well as experiments for improved sustainable and resilient stormwater management namely, flexibility of stormwater systems, energy use reduction, efficient land use, priority of transport and socioeconomic nexus, climate change impact, securing critical infrastructure, and resolving questions regarding responsibilities.
Open AccessRe-Thinking Urban Flood Management—Time for a Regime Shift
Urban flooding is of growing concern due to increasing densification of urban areas, changes in land use, and climate change. The traditional engineering approach to flooding is designing single-purpose drainage systems, dams, and levees. These methods, however, are known to increase the long-term flood risk and harm the riverine ecosystems in urban as well as rural areas. In the present paper, we depart from resilience theory and suggest a concept to improve urban flood resilience. We identify areas where contemporary challenges call for improved collaborative urban flood management. The concept emphasizes resiliency and achieved synergy between increased capacity to handle stormwater runoff and improved experiential and functional quality of the urban environments. We identify research needs as well as experiments for improved sustainable and resilient stormwater management namely, flexibility of stormwater systems, energy use reduction, efficient land use, priority of transport and socioeconomic nexus, climate change impact, securing critical infrastructure, and resolving questions regarding responsibilities.