Ayşe Balamir
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Ayşe Balamir has a total of 24 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Asli Kirectepe Aydin
Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Nişantaşı University, Istanbul, Turkey
3 shared publications - Eda Tahir Turanli
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Acıbadem University Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, İstanbul, Türkiye ";" Molecular Biology and Genetics Program, Acıbadem University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, İstanbul, Türkiye
3 shared publications - Elif Everest
Department of Molecular Biology-Genetics and Biotechnology, Dr. Orhan Öcalgiray Molecular Biology-Biotechnology and Genetics Research Centre, Graduate School of Science, Engineering and Technology, İstanbul Technical University, Ayazağa Campus, Maslak, 34469, Istanbul, Turkey
3 shared publications - Ozgur Kasapcopur
Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye
3 shared publications - Abdurrahman Tufan
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
2 shared publications - Amra Adrovic
Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 18 March 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Rheumatology International
- Vol. 39 (5) , 921
Correction to: Diagnostic utility of a targeted next-generation sequencing gene panel in the clinical suspicion of systemic autoinflammatory diseases: a multi-center study
The second affiliation of the corresponding author Eda Tahir Turanlı was incorrectly published as İstanbul Medeniyet University instead of Istanbul Technical University.
- 18 March 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Rheumatology International
- Vol. 39 (5) , 921
Correction to: Diagnostic utility of a targeted next-generation sequencing gene panel in the clinical suspicion of systemic autoinflammatory diseases: a multi-center study
The second affiliation of the corresponding author Eda Tahir Turanlı was incorrectly published as İstanbul Medeniyet University instead of Istanbul Technical University.
- 19 February 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Rheumatology International
- Vol. 39 (5) , 911-919
Diagnostic utility of a targeted next-generation sequencing gene panel in the clinical suspicion of systemic autoinflammatory diseases: a multi-center study
Systemic autoinflammatory diseases (sAIDs) are a heterogeneous group of disorders, having monogenic inherited forms with overlapping clinical manifestations. More than half of patients do not carry any pathogenic variant in formerly associated disease genes. Here, we report a cross-sectional study on targeted Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) screening in patients with suspected sAIDs to determine the diagnostic utility of genetic screening. Fifteen autoinflammation/immune-related genes (ADA2-CARD14-IL10RA-LPIN2-MEFV-MVK-NLRC4-NLRP12-NLRP3-NOD2-PLCG2-PSTPIP1-SLC29A3-TMEM173-TNFRSF1A) were used to screen 196 subjects from adult/pediatric clinics, each with an initial clinical suspicion of one or more sAID diagnosis with the exclusion of typical familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) patients. Following the genetic screening, 140 patients (71.4%) were clinically followed-up and re-evaluated. Fifty rare variants in 41 patients (20.9%) were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic and 32 of those variants were located on the MEFV gene. We detected pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants compatible with the final diagnoses and inheritance patterns in 14/140 (10%) of patients for the following sAIDs: familial Mediterranean fever (n = 7), deficiency of adenosine deaminase 2 (n = 2), mevalonate kinase deficiency (n = 2), Muckle–Wells syndrome (n = 1), Majeed syndrome (n = 1), and STING-associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy (n = 1). Targeted NGS panels have impact on diagnosing rare monogenic sAIDs for a group of patients. We suggest that MEFV gene screening should be first-tier genetic testing especially in regions with high carrier rates. Clinical utility of multi-gene testing in sAIDs was as low as expected, but extensive genome-wide familial analyses in combination with exome screening would enlighten additional genetic factors causing disease.
- 19 February 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Rheumatology International
- Vol. 39 (5) , 911-919
Diagnostic utility of a targeted next-generation sequencing gene panel in the clinical suspicion of systemic autoinflammatory diseases: a multi-center study
Systemic autoinflammatory diseases (sAIDs) are a heterogeneous group of disorders, having monogenic inherited forms with overlapping clinical manifestations. More than half of patients do not carry any pathogenic variant in formerly associated disease genes. Here, we report a cross-sectional study on targeted Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) screening in patients with suspected sAIDs to determine the diagnostic utility of genetic screening. Fifteen autoinflammation/immune-related genes (ADA2-CARD14-IL10RA-LPIN2-MEFV-MVK-NLRC4-NLRP12-NLRP3-NOD2-PLCG2-PSTPIP1-SLC29A3-TMEM173-TNFRSF1A) were used to screen 196 subjects from adult/pediatric clinics, each with an initial clinical suspicion of one or more sAID diagnosis with the exclusion of typical familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) patients. Following the genetic screening, 140 patients (71.4%) were clinically followed-up and re-evaluated. Fifty rare variants in 41 patients (20.9%) were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic and 32 of those variants were located on the MEFV gene. We detected pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants compatible with the final diagnoses and inheritance patterns in 14/140 (10%) of patients for the following sAIDs: familial Mediterranean fever (n = 7), deficiency of adenosine deaminase 2 (n = 2), mevalonate kinase deficiency (n = 2), Muckle–Wells syndrome (n = 1), Majeed syndrome (n = 1), and STING-associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy (n = 1). Targeted NGS panels have impact on diagnosing rare monogenic sAIDs for a group of patients. We suggest that MEFV gene screening should be first-tier genetic testing especially in regions with high carrier rates. Clinical utility of multi-gene testing in sAIDs was as low as expected, but extensive genome-wide familial analyses in combination with exome screening would enlighten additional genetic factors causing disease.
- 11 October 2017
- Published by Caleo in Turkish Archives of Pediatrics
- Vol. 52 (3) , 113-121
Role of genetics in pediatric rheumatology
Pediatric rheumatology includes autoinflammatory monogenic diseases, autoinflammatory multifactorial diseases with complex inheritance, and diseases with uncertain clinical diagnosis or undefined conditions, even though they show signs of autoinflammation. Most of these diseases are systemic; it is important to diagnose patients promptly and definitively and to select proper treatment options based on the diagnoses. Clinical observation and acute-phase responses are usually sufficient for diagnosis; however, genetic analyses can provide supportive data for definite diagnosis and treatment, especially for rare monogenic diseases. As for multifactorial autoinflammatory diseases, susceptibility genes, and factors involved in the etiopathogenesis have not been fully identified. It is possible to identify disease genes and novel diseases, and lead to new treatment options by gene mapping studies and high-throughput screening strategies for multifactorial diseases and conditions with uncertain clinical characteristics. In this review, we discuss the three groups of autoinflammatory diseases and role of genetics in their diagnosis.
- 11 October 2017
- Published by Caleo in Turkish Archives of Pediatrics
- Vol. 52 (3) , 113-121
Role of genetics in pediatric rheumatology
Pediatric rheumatology includes autoinflammatory monogenic diseases, autoinflammatory multifactorial diseases with complex inheritance, and diseases with uncertain clinical diagnosis or undefined conditions, even though they show signs of autoinflammation. Most of these diseases are systemic; it is important to diagnose patients promptly and definitively and to select proper treatment options based on the diagnoses. Clinical observation and acute-phase responses are usually sufficient for diagnosis; however, genetic analyses can provide supportive data for definite diagnosis and treatment, especially for rare monogenic diseases. As for multifactorial autoinflammatory diseases, susceptibility genes, and factors involved in the etiopathogenesis have not been fully identified. It is possible to identify disease genes and novel diseases, and lead to new treatment options by gene mapping studies and high-throughput screening strategies for multifactorial diseases and conditions with uncertain clinical characteristics. In this review, we discuss the three groups of autoinflammatory diseases and role of genetics in their diagnosis.