Wei Lu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Wei Lu has a total of 9 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Di Zhang
Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
1 shared publication - Haiyan Dong
Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China
1 shared publication - Hao Li
Central Intensive Care Unit, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061 China
1 shared publication - Hehe Bai
Department of Pharmacy, Xi’an Central Hospital, Xi’an, PR China
1 shared publication - Kai Cui
Department of Management of the Economy, Xi'an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi'an, 710061 China
1 shared publication - Sasa Hu
Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Yanta Western Road No. 277, Xi'an, 710061 China
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 7 January 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
- Vol. 8 (1) , 5
Evaluation of carbapenem use in a tertiary hospital: antimicrobial stewardship urgently needed
China launched a 3-year rectification scheme for the clinical use of antibiotics in 2011, and a specific scheme for carbapenem use in 2017. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of government policies on carbapenem use, and their correlation with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). The study was divided into four stages: preintervention (2010), antimicrobial programme (2011–2013), post-antimicrobial programme (2014–2016) and carbapenem programme (2017). A point-score system was proposed for evaluating the rationality of carbapenem use, and evaluated based on the indications, microbial culture, single dose, interval, and duration. Any prescription without a global score of 10 points was judged as irrational. The trend was analyzed by regression analysis, and Spearman correlation analysis was used for testing the correlation. The rate of rational use of carbapenems was 29.7% in 2010, and increased by 55.5, 45.2, and 51.5% during the subsequent three stages. The rationality declined slightly during the post-antimicrobial programme (2014–2016) while the consumption of carbapenems was markedly increased. These two parameters improved slightly in 2017. Moreover, the prevalence of CRPA was significantly negatively correlated with the rate of rational carbapenem use (Coefficient = − 0.553, P < 0.05), and not with the consumption of carbapenems (P > 0.05). The rational application of carbapenems was related to government policies in this study, with irrational carbapenem use possibly related to the development of CRPA. The current point-score system could be a useful tool for performing assessments.
- 7 January 2019
- Published by Springer Nature in Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
- Vol. 8 (1) , 5
Open AccessEvaluation of carbapenem use in a tertiary hospital: antimicrobial stewardship urgently needed
China launched a 3-year rectification scheme for the clinical use of antibiotics in 2011, and a specific scheme for carbapenem use in 2017. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of government policies on carbapenem use, and their correlation with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). The study was divided into four stages: preintervention (2010), antimicrobial programme (2011–2013), post-antimicrobial programme (2014–2016) and carbapenem programme (2017). A point-score system was proposed for evaluating the rationality of carbapenem use, and evaluated based on the indications, microbial culture, single dose, interval, and duration. Any prescription without a global score of 10 points was judged as irrational. The trend was analyzed by regression analysis, and Spearman correlation analysis was used for testing the correlation. The rate of rational use of carbapenems was 29.7% in 2010, and increased by 55.5, 45.2, and 51.5% during the subsequent three stages. The rationality declined slightly during the post-antimicrobial programme (2014–2016) while the consumption of carbapenems was markedly increased. These two parameters improved slightly in 2017. Moreover, the prevalence of CRPA was significantly negatively correlated with the rate of rational carbapenem use (Coefficient = − 0.553, P < 0.05), and not with the consumption of carbapenems (P > 0.05). The rational application of carbapenems was related to government policies in this study, with irrational carbapenem use possibly related to the development of CRPA. The current point-score system could be a useful tool for performing assessments.