ALAndrew Love

Andrew Love

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Andrew Love has a total of 16 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Evidence for groundwater mixing at Freeling Spring Group, South Australia

    by Todd Halihan, Andrew Love, Mark Keppel, Meghan K. M. Dailey, Volmer Berens, Daniel Wohling


  • Backing up the AEM – unravelling a palaeovalley fill for groundwater exploration in the APY Lands

    by Carmen Krapf, Adrian Costar, Mark Keppel, Kent Inverarity, Andy Love, Liliana Stoian, Georgina Gordon, Camilla Soerensen, Tim Munday

    A major constraint on development in the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara (APY) Lands is the lack of reliable water supplies. Sandstone strata found within palaeovalleys has long been recognised as potentially productive aquifers in outback South Australia. Although the APY Lands are known to contain such geologic features, their development as a viable water supply has been hindered by an acute lack of knowledge. An extensive airborne electromagnetic (AEM) survey was acquired as part of the Goyder Institute for Water Research’s Facilitating Long-term Outback Water Solutions Stage 3 (G-FLOWS S3) project in order to improve the understanding of groundwater resource potential in this remote region of South Australia. The AEM data revealed an intricate drainage pattern below the modern-day land surface that represents palaeovalleys. This facilitated the spatial refinement of these palaeodrainage features and provided a better understanding of their overall thickness. A targeted drilling campaign followed the AEM survey. Whereas the AEM data covers a large area of the APY Lands, drilling focused on two areas near the community of Kaltjiti (Fregon) in the eastern part of the APY Lands. Two hydrogeological test sites helped to understand and monitor the groundwater system associated with the Lindsay East Palaeovalley. Furthermore, drilling determined the true depth of the palaeovalley and provided a stratigraphic record. This enabled the validation of the AEM hydrogeophysical model, which included the identification of groundwater bearing zones within the palaeovalley. In total, 11 groundwater wells were constructed and continuous drill core was collected at the two sites. Drilling near the centre of the Lindsay East Palaeovalley suggests there are at least three groundwater-bearing zones. The basal coarse-grained sandstone unit of the younger palaeovalley fill shows promise as a productive aquifer, with development yields varying between 5 and 20 L/sec and salinities of <1000 mg/L TDS.


  • Open Access

    Modelling size constraints on carbonate platform formation in groundwater upwelling zones

    by Mark N. Keppel, Vincent E. A. Post, Andrew J. Love, Adrian D. Werner, Jonathan D. A. Clarke, Todd Halihan

    Carbonate depositional systems related to groundwater upwelling are ubiquitous around the world and form ecologically and culturally important features of many landscapes. Spring carbonate deposits record past climatic and hydrological conditions. The reconstruction of past processes using spring carbonate proxies requires fundamental understanding of the factors that control their geometry. In this work, we show that the spatial extent of spring carbonate platforms is amenable to quantitative prediction by simulating the early growth stage of their formation for the iconic mound springs in the central Australian outback. We exploit their well-defined, circular geometry to demonstrate the existence of two size-limiting regimes: one controlled by the spring flow rate and the other by the concentration of lattice ions. Deviations between modelled and observed size metrics are attributable to diminishing spring flow rates since formation, enabling assessment of the relative vulnerability of springs to further hydrological change.