Thierry Preseau

A stroke is a life-threatening medical condition that could be disabling if left untreated. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) can be effective when initiated in an acute stroke, but their benefit is time-dependent and their use may be restricted by contraindications (CIs) such as anticoagulation therapy. The critical therapeutic time window, which was previously limited to 4.5-6 hours, is now extended to 24 hours in selected patients due to the development of advanced neuroimaging techniques. Herein, we discuss the case of a 50-year-old patient on rivaroxaban who developed acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and was treated successfully with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator thrombolysis more than six hours after the time he was last seen well (LSW). Our case demonstrates the importance of advanced neuroimaging techniques in identifying AIS candidates for IVT and/or MT with late or unknown time windows as well as the importance of case-by-case assessment when challenged by theoretical contraindications for thrombolysis.

Introduction: Procalcitonin is a marker for bacterial diseases and has been used to guide antibiotic prescription. Procalcitonin accuracy, measured at admission, in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), is unknown in the current severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin to assess the need for antibiotic treatment in patients with CAP presenting to the emergency department during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Methods: We performed a real-world diagnostic retrospective accuracy study of procalcitonin in patients admitted to the emergency department. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated based on procalcitonin results compared to the reference standard of combined microbiological and radiological analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under (AUC) the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve were calculated in two analyses: first assessing procalcitonin ability to differentiate microbiologically proven bacteria from viral CAP and then clinically diagnosed bacterial CAP from viral CAP. Results: When using a procalcitonin threshold of 0.5 ng/mL to identify bacterial etiology within patients with CAP, we observed sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 64.1%, and 43% and 82.6%, respectively, in the two analyses. The positive and negative predictive values of a procalcitonin threshold of 0.5 ng/mL to identify patients for whom antibiotics should be advised were 46.4% and 79.7%, and 48.9% and 79% in the two analyses, respectively. The AUC for the two analyses was 0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–0.68) and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.55–0.69). Conclusions: Procalcitonin measured upon admission during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic should not guide antibiotic treatment in patients with CAP.