DMDavid Metzger

David Metzger

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


David Metzger has a total of 60 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Association between retention in HIV care, psychiatric comorbidities, and outcomes in veterans with HIV

    by Ravishankar Jayadevappa, Knashawn Morales, Rina Hanumali, David Metzger, Sumedha Chhatre

    Background: In the US, the Veterans Health Administration is the largest single institutional provider of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) care for veterans. Retention in care can affect treatment adherence and care outcomes. Psychiatric disorders are prevalent in people with HIV and may lead to poorer retention in care and outcomes. Objectives: To examine the association between retention in HIV care, psychiatric comorbidities, and clinical outcomes among veterans with HIV. Research Design: In this retrospective study, veterans aged ≥18, seen with a diagnosis of HIV between 2000 and 2017, were identified from the Corporate Data Warehouse. We identified those with and without psychiatric comorbidities in the HIV cohort. Outcomes (mortality, viral suppression, and inpatient and outpatient visits) were assessed over a five-year follow-up period. Retention in care was measured during the first year of follow-up. We modeled outcomes as a function of retention in care and tested the moderating effects of psychiatric comorbidity and treatment for psychiatric comorbidity. Results: Cohort consisted of 59,649 veterans with a diagnosis of HIV; 66% had psychiatric comorbidity, and 90% received treatment for it. Overall, 49% were retained in HIV care. Retention in care was associated with better survival and viral suppression, regardless of psychiatric comorbidity; however, psychiatric comorbidity influenced healthcare utilization. Conclusions: Our study provides important insights into the relationship between retention in care, psychiatric comorbidity, and outcomes in veterans with HIV. Future research must assess the barriers to care and strategies to integrate mental health and HIV treatments for veterans.

  • Early Engagement in HIV Research: Evaluation of the Penn CFAR Scholars Program Aimed at Increasing Diversity of the HIV/AIDS Workforce

    by Edward F. Kreider, Yohaniz Bs Ortega-Burgos, Jeriel Dumeng-Rodriguez, James Bs Gesualdi, Caroline O'BRien, Danny Ba Bracy, Jeanene Johnson, Jacqui Bowman, David Metzger, C. Jessica Md Dine, et al.

    Background: Demographic diversity is not represented in the HIV/AIDS workforce. Engagement of underrepresented trainees as early as high school may address this disparity. Methods: We established the Penn Center for AIDS Research (CFAR) Scholars Program, a mentored research experience for underrepresented minority (URM) trainees spanning educational stages from high school to medical school. The program provides participants with tailored educational programming, professional skill building, and mentored research experiences. We conducted qualitative interviews with scholar, mentor, and leadership groups to evaluate the program's impact. Results: Eleven participants were selected to partake in 1 of 5 existing mentored research programs as CFAR scholars. Scholars attended an 8-week HIV Seminar Series that covered concepts in the basic, clinical, behavioral, and community-based HIV/AIDS research. Program evaluation revealed that scholars’ knowledge of HIV pathophysiology and community impact increased because of these seminars. In addition, they developed tangible skills in literature review, bench techniques, qualitative assessment, data analysis, and professional network building. Scholars reported improved academic self-efficacy and achieved greater career goal clarity. Areas for improvement included clarification of mentor–mentee roles, expectations for longitudinal mentorship, and long-term engagement between scholars. Financial stressors, lack of social capital, and structural racism were identified as barriers to success for URM trainees. Conclusion: The Penn CFAR Scholars Program is a novel mentored research program that successfully engaged URM trainees from early educational stages. Barriers and facilitators to sustained efforts of diversifying the HIV/AIDS workforce were identified and will inform future program planning.


  • Number of opioid overdoses and depression as a predictor of suicidal thoughts

    by Lily A. Brown, Cecile M. Denis, Anthony Leon, Michael B. Blank, Steven D. Douglas, Knashawn H. Morales, Paul F. Crits-Christoph, David S. Metzger, Dwight L. Evans


  • Open Access

    Regional differences between people who inject drugs in an HIV prevention trial integrating treatment and prevention (HPTN 074): a baseline analysis

    by Kathryn E Lancaster, Irving F Hoffman, Brett Hanscom, Tran Viet Ha, Kostyantyn Dumchev, Hepa Susami, Scott Rose, Vivian F Go, Sarah A Reifeis, Katie R Mollan, et al.

    Introduction: People who inject drugs (PWID) experience high HIV incidence and face significant barriers to engagement in HIV care and substance use treatment. Strategies for HIV treatment as prevention and substance use treatment present unique challenges in PWID that may vary regionally. Understanding differences in the risk structure for HIV transmission and disease progression among PWID is essential in developing and effectively targeting intervention strategies of HIV treatment as prevention.Methods: We present a baseline analysis of HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 074, a two‐arm, randomized controlled trial among PWID in Indonesia (n = 258), Ukraine (n = 457) and Vietnam (n = 439). HPTN 074 was designed to determine the feasibility, barriers and uptake of an integrated intervention combining health systems navigation and psychosocial counselling for the early engagement of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and substance use treatment for PWID living with HIV. Discordant PWID networks were enrolled, consisting of an HIV‐positive index and their HIV‐negative network injection partner(s). Among the enrolled cohort of 1154 participants (502 index participants and 652 network partners), we examine regional differences in the baseline risk structure, including sociodemographics, HIV and substance use treatment history, and injection and sexual risk behaviours.Results: The majority of participants were male (87%), with 82% of the enrolled females coming from Ukraine. The overall mean age was 34 (IQR: 30, 38). Most commonly injected substances included illegally manufactured methadone in Ukraine (84.2%), and heroin in Indonesia (81.8%) and Vietnam (99.5%). Injection network sizes varied by region: median number of people with whom participants self‐reported injecting drugs was 3 (IQR: 2, 5) in Indonesia, 5 (IQR: 3, 10) in Ukraine and 3 (IQR: 2, 4) in Vietnam. Hazardous alcohol use, assessed using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test – Alcohol Consumption Questions (AUDIT‐C), was prominent in Ukraine (54.7%) and Vietnam (26.4%). Reported sexual risk behaviours in the past month, including having two or more sex partners and giving/receiving money or drugs in exchange for sex, were uncommon among all participants and regions.Conclusions: While regional differences in risk structure exist, PWID particularly in Ukraine need immediate attention for risk reduction strategies. Substantial regional differences in risk structure will require flexible, tailored treatment as prevention interventions for distinct PWID populations.