Jacopo Andreuccetti

Background: One of the challenges in treating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is to manage lesions abutted to the duodenum, bowel and stomach. Simultaneous integrated protection (SIP) is one of the proposed approaches to increase plan reproducibility and quality. However, no clinical data are available regarding the dosimetric objectives impacting local control probability. Methods: This is a prospective, single-arm study. Key inclusion criteria were as follows: PDAC histology; tumor abutment with duodenum, stomach, or small bowel; and SRT schedule consisting of 45 Gy in six fractions. Delineation of the PTV overlapped with critical OARs (PTV_SIP) and PTV outside critical OARs (PTV_Dominant) was mandatory. Dose constraints were as follows: (near) maximum dose, D2cc, and D20cc to critical OARs 38 Gy, 32 Gy, and 24 Gy, respectively. This study was designed to prospectively investigate the main clinical and dosimetric parameters impacting freedom from local recurrence (FFLR). Results: From June 2019 to January 2024, 104 patients were enrolled. One-year FFLR was 91.7%. Fifteen events of local failure occurred (17.6%). Mapping of local relapses showed a relapse inside the PTV_SIP area in nine patients and outside the PTV_SIP in six cases (NS). Whole PTV > 69 cc, PTV_SIP > 4 cc, PTV-SIP/whole PTV ratio > 7%, (near) Dmin to PTV_SIP < 25 Gy, mean dose to PTV_SIP < 28 Gy, and (near) Dmin to PTV_Dominant < 29 Gy were associated with worse FFLR. Multivariable analysis showed PTV_SIP absolute volume of more than 4 cc, mean dose to PTV_SIP < 28 Gy and whole PTV > 69 cc were independently related to worse FFLR. One case of acute G4 toxicity and two cases of acute G3 toxicity occurred, with two late toxicity deaths not certainly due to treatment. Conclusions: In this prospective study, SIP planning strategy with six fractions is safe and effective in pancreatic targets with critical contact with critical OARs. Given its potential advantages, SIP planning is a potential innovative strategy that should be compared to standard SRT planning in an ad hoc trial design.

Purpose Rectus Abdominis diastasis (RAD) is a prevalent condition, particularly in post-gravidic women, with functional and esthetic impact. This Delphi consensus, led by general surgeons, aimed to establish evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of RAD in post-gravidic women. Methods A Delphi process was conducted under the auspices of the Italian Society of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery (ISHAWS), the national chapter of the European Hernia Society (EHS). A steering committee supervised systematic literature reviews to evaluate the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations. Iterative rounds of voting involving 105 expert panellists were conducted, with Consensus defined as ≥ 70% agreement. Non-consensual recommendations were revised and discussed in a plenary session during the Italian Society of Surgery (SIC) Congress, 2024. Results Consensus was achieved on 12 recommendations covering RAD diagnosis, classification, and treatment. Key findings included the endorsement of radiological methods for accurate RAD assessment, the establishment of surgical thresholds (> 2.5 cm inter-recti distance for symptom improvement), and the recommendation of minimally invasive linea alba plication for surgical management. Non-operative treatments, such as targeted exercise programs, were emphasized as first-line approaches. For RAD with concomitant hernias of the linea alba with defects > 1 cm, mesh reinforcement was strongly recommended, with extraperitoneal placement preferred. The importance of tailoring approaches based on patient-specific factors and fostering shared decision-making was highlighted. Conclusion This consensus provides a structured framework for RAD management, emphasizing accurate diagnosis, tailored treatments, and patient-centered care. Future multicenter studies are required to address remaining evidence gaps and refine these recommendations.

The impact of the microbiota on radiation (RT)-induced toxicity and cancer response to radiotherapy is an emerging area of interest. In this review, we summarize the available preclinical and clinical evidence concerning microbiota modulation of RT toxicity and efficacy in the main gastrointestinal (GI) districts. A huge amount of data supports the clinical application of microbiota modulation, particularly through prebiotics and probiotics, to prevent or mitigate radiotherapy-induced toxicity in rectal cancer. Preclinical and clinical studies also support the observation of microbiota modulation to impact the toxicity and efficacy of treatment in esophageal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). However, insufficient evidence remains to endorse microbiota modulation as a strategy to enhance tumor radiosensitivity in clinical practice. Well-designed studies focusing on prebiotics, probiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation are needed across all GI sites to evaluate their potential to improve treatment efficacy, as suggested by promising preclinical findings. The impact of pre-treatment microbiota analyses should be addressed in prospective studies to verify the efficacy of patient-level tailored strategies. Additionally, the repurposing of radioprotective agents with innovative delivery systems, such as encapsulated amifostine, holds significant promise for mitigating small bowel toxicity, thereby enabling more effective RT treatment.

Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG), during the 2013 annual Consensus Conference to gastric cancer, stated that laparoscopic or robotic approach should be limited only to early gastric cancer (EGC) and no further guidelines were currently available. However, accumulated evidences, mainly from eastern experiences, have supported the application of minimally invasive surgery also for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The aim of our study is to give a snapshot of current surgical propensity of expert Italian upper gastrointestinal surgeons in performing minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of gastric cancer in order to answer to the question if clinical practice overcome the recommendation. Experts in the field among the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG) were invited to join a web 30-item survey through a formal e-mail from January 1st, 2020, to June 31st, 2020. Responses were collected from 46 participants out of 100 upper gastrointestinal surgeons. Percentage of surgeons choosing a minimally invasive approach to treat early and advanced gastric cancer was similar. Additionally analyzing data from the centers involved, we obtained that the percentage of minimally invasive total and partial gastrectomies in advanced cases augmented with the increase of surgical procedures performed per year (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04 respectively). It is reasonable to assume that there is a widening of indications given by the current national guideline into clinical practice. Propensity of expert Italian upper gastrointestinal surgeons was to perform minimally invasive surgery not only for early but also for advanced gastric cancer. Of interest volume activity correlated with the propensity of surgeons to select a minimally invasive approach.

Background: The incidence of the highly morbid and potentially lethal gangrenous cholecystitis was reportedly increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of the ChoCO-W study was to compare the clinical findings and outcomes of acute cholecystitis in patients who had COVID-19 disease with those who did not. Methods: Data were prospectively collected over 6 months (October 1, 2020, to April 30, 2021) with 1-month follow-up. In October 2020, Delta variant of SARS CoV-2 was isolated for the first time. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed and reported according to the STROBE guidelines. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients who had COVID-19 were compared with those who did not. Results: A total of 2893 patients, from 42 countries, 218 centers, involved, with a median age of 61.3 (SD: 17.39) years were prospectively enrolled in this study; 1481 (51%) patients were males. One hundred and eighty (6.9%) patients were COVID-19 positive, while 2412 (93.1%) were negative. Concomitant preexisting diseases including cardiovascular diseases (p < 0.0001), diabetes (p < 0.0001), and severe chronic obstructive airway disease (p = 0.005) were significantly more frequent in the COVID-19 group. Markers of sepsis severity including ARDS (p < 0.0001), PIPAS score (p < 0.0001), WSES sepsis score (p < 0.0001), qSOFA (p < 0.0001), and Tokyo classification of severity of acute cholecystitis (p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in the COVID-19 group. The COVID-19 group had significantly higher postoperative complications (32.2% compared with 11.7%, p < 0.0001), longer mean hospital stay (13.21 compared with 6.51 days, p < 0.0001), and mortality rate (13.4% compared with 1.7%, p < 0.0001). The incidence of gangrenous cholecystitis was doubled in the COVID-19 group (40.7% compared with 22.3%). The mean wall thickness of the gallbladder was significantly higher in the COVID-19 group [6.32 (SD: 2.44) mm compared with 5.4 (SD: 3.45) mm; p < 0.0001]. Conclusions: The incidence of gangrenous cholecystitis is higher in COVID patients compared with non-COVID patients admitted to the emergency department with acute cholecystitis. Gangrenous cholecystitis in COVID patients is associated with high-grade Clavien-Dindo postoperative complications, longer hospital stay and higher mortality rate. The open cholecystectomy rate is higher in COVID compared with non -COVID patients. It is recommended to delay the surgical treatment in COVID patients, when it is possible, to decrease morbidity and mortality rates. COVID-19 infection and gangrenous cholecystistis are not absolute contraindications to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy, in a case by case evaluation, in expert hands. Graphical

In recent years, abdominal wall surgery has shown a clear interest in reproducing traditional open techniques and avoiding intraperitoneal mesh placement. The endoscopic Subcutaneous Onlay Laparoscopic Approach (SCOLA) is very popular in South American countries, especially for small umbilical and epigastric hernias with concomitant rectus muscles diastasis. In these cases, a full midline reconstruction should be scheduled, because hernia repair alone is affected by a higher recurrences rate compared to simultaneous hernia and diastasis repair [1–5]. Through an endoscopic dissection of the preaponeurotic subcutaneous space is possible to reconstruct the abdominal wall by placing an onlay prosthesis in those patients without excess skin or subcutaneous tissue. Although SCOLA repair is safe and feasible to correct diastasis recti and symptomatic midline hernias with excellent cosmetic results, seroma and abdominal numbness are frequent complications.

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most performed procedure all over the world with more than 20 million procedures performed each year. Due to the lack of data in literature about the learning curve of the Lichtenstein procedure, we decided to reproduce a research on learning curves with the same methodology proposed in our previous study about laparoscopic hernia repair. The aim of this multicentre study was to analyse how many cases are required to achieve the learning curve for a Lichtenstein procedure.

Following the Food and Drug Administration approval, robot-assisted colorectal surgery has gained more acceptance among surgeons. One of the open issues about robotic surgery is the economic sustainability. The aim of our study is to evaluate the economic sustainability of robotic as compared to laparoscopic right colectomy for the Italian National Health System.