CZChenliang Zhang

Chenliang Zhang

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Chenliang Zhang has a total of 5 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Huakang Li

    Department of Cardiology, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China

    1 shared publication
  • Ping Zhu

    Department of Cardiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China

    1 shared publication
  • Xin Zhou

    Department of Cardiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China

    1 shared publication
  • Zhi-Yuan Song

    Department of Cardiology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China

    1 shared publication
  • Zhihui Zhang

    Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Center for Circadian Metabolism and Cardiovascular Disease, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China

    1 shared publication

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

    by Ping Zhu, Xin Zhou, Chenliang Zhang, Huakang Li, Zhihui Zhang, Zhiyuan Song

    The Orsiro biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES) is a new-generation biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent with the thinnest strut thickness to date developed to improve the percutaneous treatment of patients with coronary artery disease. We perform a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety of an ultra-thin, Orsiro biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (O-SES) compared with durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DESs). Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing the safety and efficacy of O-SES versus DP-DES. Paired reviewers independently screened citations, assessed risk of bias of included studies, and extracted data. We used the Mantel-Haenszel method to calculate risk ratio (RR) by means of a random-effects model. Six RCTs with a total of 6949 patients were selected. All included trials were rated as low risk of bias. The O-SES significantly reduced the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62–0.98; I2 = 0%; 10 fewer per 1000 [from 1 fewer to 18 fewer]; high quality) compared with the DP-DES. There was no significant difference between O-SES and DP-DES in the prevention of stent thrombosis (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.52–1.08), cardiac death (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.63–1.36), target lesion revascularization (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.86–1.42) and target vessel revascularization (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.78–1.21). Among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, O-SES resulted in significantly lower rates of myocardial infarction than DP-DES and had a trend toward reduction in stent thrombosis.