Soner Yılmaz

Background and Objectives: Natural disasters pose significant challenges to maintaining a continuous and safe blood supply. This study aimed to analyse the emergency response of the Turkish Red Crescent (TRC) blood services during the 2023 Turkey earthquake, focusing on blood supply continuity, donor mobilization and lessons learnt for future preparedness. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using operational data from the TRC General Directorate of Blood Services. Information on blood component requests, supplies, donor mobilization, infrastructure status and personnel deployment was collected from the period immediately following the earthquake through the subsequent recovery phase. Results: The earthquake severely disrupted blood service infrastructure in the affected provinces, resulting in the destruction of two blood collection units and damage to several facilities. Despite these challenges, the TRC successfully met demands from the transfusion centres through rapid activation of its Emergency Crisis Board, inter‐regional redistribution of packed red blood cells and strategic donor management. Within 15 days, 250,708 blood units were collected nationwide—a 129% increase compared to pre‐disaster levels. Controlled donation scheduling, proactive communication and inter‐regional staff deployment ensured sustained operations and prevented overcollection. However, gaps in data interoperability between hospitals and TRC systems limited real‐time monitoring of clinical blood usage. Conclusion: The TRC's response demonstrated the effectiveness of a centralized and integrated blood service model in managing large‐scale emergencies. Key lessons include the importance of donor flow regulation, transparent communication and improved hospital data integration to enhance future disaster preparedness and resilience.

Comparison of COVID-19 RT-PCR-Positive Patients in Oro-Nasopharynx Samples with RT-PCR Results in Simultaneous Stool Samples, Prospective Study - Istanbul Medical Journal

In the hepatitis C virus (HCV) diagnostic algorithm, an anti-HCV screening test is recommended first. In countries with low HCV prevalence, anti-HCV testing can often give false-positive results. This may lead to unnecessary retesting, increased costs, and psychological stress for patients.

Additional or different test procedures can be applied to maximize transfusion safety by reducing the risk of transfusion-transmitted infections. Antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) is one of the most commonly used serologic marker in this context. The aim of the study was to analyse anti-Hbc test results performed within the scope of routine screening tests in our center and to examine the effect of the donor re-entry protocol established. A total of 57191 people who applied to Gülhane Regional Blood Center to donate blood between 2014-2019 were included in the study. All blood donations were screened for anti-HBc by chemiluminescense immunoassay (Architect i2000 SR, AXSYM, Abbott, IL, USA). Hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) (ABI Prism 7500 Real time PCR system, Applied Biosystems, USA) tests were performed in accordance with the donor recovery protocol for those who could be reached among those with positive for anti-HBc test results. Samples with > 100 IU/ml of anti-HBs levels and negative for HBV DNA test were included in the donor pool. Of the 57 191 blood donors involved in the study, 5125 (8.5%) were found as positive for anti-HBc. Of the donors, 54 035 (94.4%) were male and 3156 (5.5%) were female. The difference was found to be statistically significant in terms of gender distribution between the years of the study (p<0.001). The highest anti-HBc positivity rate (35.7%) was in the age group of 60 years and over while the lowest positivity rate (3.8%) was in the age group of 18-30 years (r= 0.549, p= 0.0001). The year with the highest anti-HBc seroprevalance (10.1%) was 2017, while the year with the lowest (7.9%) was 2014. The distribution of seropositivity over the years was statistically significant (p<0.001). In the study, anti-HBs and HBV-DNA test results of 439 donors were accessible and of which 301 (68.5%) were considered eligible to donate again according to the re-entry protocol. The isolated anti-HBc positivity and HBV-DNA positivity rates were 7.5% (33/430) and 0.2% (1/439) respectively,in blood donors to whom re-entry protocol was performed. The seroprevalance of anti-HBc below 10% during the six-year period in which the study was conducted is a critical data for the evaluation of this test within the scope of routine microbiological screening tests. Moreover, we have observed that donor losses due to the antiHBc testing can be significantly reduced with the implementation of donor re-entry protocols. Anti-HBc screening strategy should be decided by considering of HBV epidemiology, cost-effectivity and possible blood donor losses.

Yılmaz S, et al. Blood Res. 2019 Dec;54(4):262-268. https://doi.org/10.5045/br.2019.54.4.262