RSRachel D. Scarlett

Rachel D. Scarlett

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Rachel D. Scarlett has a total of 43 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Reorienting urban stream management to focus on equitable delivery of benefits

    by Seth J. Wenger, Aditi S. Bhaskar, Brian Murphy, Martin Neale, Mateo Scoggins, Isabelle Barrett, Brian Bledsoe, Krista A. Capps, María M. Castillo, Erika Diaz Pascacio, et al.

    Urban streams are often managed in ways that contribute to societal inequities. Members of marginalized groups are frequently exposed to elevated flood risk and impaired water quality, with reduced access to essential water infrastructure and greenspace within stream corridors. The freshwater science research community has traditionally argued for stream management that improves ecological integrity, which can have the unintended consequence of steering investments away from the most degraded streams, which are often in low-income neighborhoods. We argue that it is time to reorient municipal stream management programs towards the objective of equitable delivery of benefits, which can take many forms, and to de-emphasize the goal of restoring streams to the pre-development ecological condition. To meet the objective of equitable delivery of benefits, municipalities will need to establish systems of collaborative governance, in which community organizations are empowered to participate as equal partners in urban stream management decision-making. We recognize the many practical challenges municipalities face in making these transitions, which will vary by country and region. Here, we identify some opportunities and highlight case studies illustrating how some communities are taking steps toward more equitable urban stream management.


  • Open Access

    Respiration regimes in rivers: Partitioning source‐specific respiration from metabolism time series

    by Enrico Bertuzzo, Erin R. Hotchkiss, Alba Argerich, John S. Kominoski, Diana Oviedo‐Vargas, Philip Savoy, Rachel Scarlett, Daniel von Schiller, James B. Heffernan

    Respiration in streams is controlled by the timing, magnitude, and quality of organic matter (OM) inputs from internal primary production and external fluxes. Here, we estimated the contribution of different OM sources to seasonal, annual, and event‐driven characteristics of whole‐stream ecosystem respiration (ER) using an inverse modeling framework that accounts for possible time‐lags between OM inputs and respiration. We modeled site‐specific, dynamic OM stocks contributing to ER: autochthonous OM from gross primary production (GPP); allochthonous OM delivered during flow events; and seasonal pulses of leaf litter. OM stored in the sediment and dissolved organic matter (DOM) transported during baseflow were modeled as a stable stock contributing to baseline respiration. We applied this modeling framework to five streams with different catchment size, climate, and canopy cover, where multi‐year time series of ER and environmental variables were available. Overall, the model explained between 53% and 74% of observed ER dynamics. Respiration of autochthonous OM tracked seasonal peaks in GPP in spring or summer. Increases in ER were often associated with high‐flow events. Respiration associated with litter inputs was larger in smaller streams. Time lags between leaf inputs and respiration were longer than for other OM sources, likely due to lower biological reactivity. Model estimates of source‐specific ER and OM stocks compared well with existing measures of OM stocks, inputs, and respiration or decomposition. Our modeling approach has the potential to expand the scale of comparative analyses of OM dynamics within and among freshwater ecosystems.


  • Stormwater on the margins: Influence of race, gender, and education on willingness to participate in stormwater management

    by Rachel D. Scarlett, Mangala Subramaniam, Sara K. McMillan, Anastasia T. Ingermann, Sandra M. Clinton


  • Influence of stormwater control measures on water quality at nested sites in a small suburban watershed

    by Rachel D. Scarlett, Sara K. McMillan, Colin D. Bell, Sandra M. Clinton, Anne J. Jefferson, P. Suresh C. Rao

    Stormwater control measures (SCMs) are designed to mitigate the deleterious impacts of urban runoff on the water quality of receiving waters. To assess the cumulative effects of SCMs at the watershed scale, we monitored longitudinal changes in storm discharge and stream water chemistry at high temporal resolution in a suburban headwater stream in Charlotte, NC. SCMs significantly decreased or stabilized instream concentrations of reactive solutes (nitrate, soluble reactive phosphorus, and dissolved organic carbon) relative to the upstream control site. However, SCM outflows minimally influenced concentrations of less reactive solutes (major ions) which increased with urbanization. Additionally, instream concentration variability correlated with antecedent moisture conditions – representative of watershed storage availability – highlighting the role that SCM storage availability plays in the timing of solute delivery to the stream. Our results show that SCMs decrease instream concentrations of biogeochemically reactive solutes but the mitigation potential is temporally dynamic and influenced by antecedent conditions.


  • Open Access

    Effects of UV photodegradation on subsequent microbial decomposition of Bromus diandrus litter

    by Yang Lin, Rachel D. Scarlett, Jennifer Y. King


  • Marine microbes rapidly adapt to consume ethane, propane, and butane within the dissolved hydrocarbon plume of a natural seep

    by Stephanie D. Mendes, Molly C. Redmond, Karl Voigritter, Christian Perez, Rachel Scarlett, David L. Valentine

    Simple hydrocarbon gases containing two to four carbons (ethane, propane, and butane) are among the most abundant compounds present in petroleum reservoirs, and are introduced into the ocean through natural seepage and industrial discharge. Yet little is known about the bacterial consumption of these compounds in ocean waters. To assess the timing by which microbes metabolize these gases, we conducted a three‐phase study that tested and applied a radiotracer‐based method to quantify the oxidation rates of ethane, propane, and butane in fresh seawater samples. Phase 1 involved the synthesis of tritiated ethane, propane, and butane using Grignard reagents and tritiated water. Phase 2 was a systematic assessment of experimental conditions, wherein the indigenous microbial community was found to rapidly oxidize ethane, propane, and butane. Phase 3 was the application of this tritium method near the Coal Oil Point seeps, offshore California. Spatial and temporal patterns of ethane, propane, and butane oxidation down current from the hydrocarbon seeps demonstrated that >99% of these gases are metabolized within 1.3 days following initial exposure. The oxidation of ethane outpaced oxidation of propane and butane with patterns indicating the microbial community responded to these gases by rapid adaptation or growth. Methane oxidation responded the slowest in plume waters. Estimates based on the observed metabolic rates and carbon mass balance suggest that ethane, propane, and butane‐consuming microorganisms may transiently account for a majority of the total microbial community in these impacted waters.