Chiara Sottocornola
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Chiara Sottocornola has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Antonio Claudio Traino
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana
1 shared publication - Carolina Marini
S.D. Radiologia Senologica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Via Roma 67, 56125 Pisa, Italy
1 shared publication - Davide Caramella
Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
1 shared publication - Giacomo Aringhieri
Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
1 shared publication - Maria Evelina Fantacci
University of Pisa
1 shared publication - Patrizio Barca
Unit of Medical Physics, Pisa University Hospital “Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana”, 56126 Pisa, Italy
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 28 December 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in European Radiology Experimental
- Vol. 1 (1) , 1-8
Average absorbed breast dose in mammography: a new possible dose index matching the requirements of the European Directive 2013/59/EURATOM
The new European Directive 2013/59/EURATOM requires that patients are informed about the risk associated with ionising radiation and that detailed information on patient exposure is included in the radiological report. This implies a revision of the routinely used dose indexes to obtain quantities related to individual exposure evaluable from acquisition parameters. Here we propose a new mammography dose index consistent with the average glandular dose (AGD). An equation has been developed for calculating the average absorbed breast dose (2ABD). It depends on incident air kerma ka,i and on energy absorption coefficient μen; ka,i can be calculated for each anode-filter combination, based on kVp, mAs, the yield of the tube used Ytb , and the breast thickness d; μen depends on kVp and has been evaluated for each anode-filter combination. 2ABD has been compared to AGD evaluated by Dance or Wu methods, which represent the reference standards, for 20 patients of our university hospital. The incident air kerma ka,i , calculated as a function of kVp, mAs, Ytb and d, was in good agreement with the same quantity directly measured: the relative uncertainty is < 0.10. The results of the comparison between 2ABD and AGD evaluated by both Dance and Wu methods appear to be consistent within the uncertainties. 2ABD is easily evaluable for each mammogram from the acquisition parameters. It can be proposed as a new suitable dose index, consistent with AGD, matching the requirements of the 2013 European Directive.
- 28 December 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in European Radiology Experimental
- Vol. 1 (1) , 1-8
Open AccessAverage absorbed breast dose in mammography: a new possible dose index matching the requirements of the European Directive 2013/59/EURATOM
The new European Directive 2013/59/EURATOM requires that patients are informed about the risk associated with ionising radiation and that detailed information on patient exposure is included in the radiological report. This implies a revision of the routinely used dose indexes to obtain quantities related to individual exposure evaluable from acquisition parameters. Here we propose a new mammography dose index consistent with the average glandular dose (AGD). An equation has been developed for calculating the average absorbed breast dose (2ABD). It depends on incident air kerma ka,i and on energy absorption coefficient μen; ka,i can be calculated for each anode-filter combination, based on kVp, mAs, the yield of the tube used Ytb , and the breast thickness d; μen depends on kVp and has been evaluated for each anode-filter combination. 2ABD has been compared to AGD evaluated by Dance or Wu methods, which represent the reference standards, for 20 patients of our university hospital. The incident air kerma ka,i , calculated as a function of kVp, mAs, Ytb and d, was in good agreement with the same quantity directly measured: the relative uncertainty is < 0.10. The results of the comparison between 2ABD and AGD evaluated by both Dance and Wu methods appear to be consistent within the uncertainties. 2ABD is easily evaluable for each mammogram from the acquisition parameters. It can be proposed as a new suitable dose index, consistent with AGD, matching the requirements of the 2013 European Directive.