Harish Madhava

The authors would like to make the following corrections to this published paper [1]

Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a viral infection affecting the central nervous system (CNS) with potential long-term consequences including neurological sequelae. Vaccination is critical to reduce TBE morbidity and mortality, as no antiviral treatment is available. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines areas with an incidence of ≥5 cases/100,000 PPY as highly endemic and recommends that vaccination is offered to all individuals in these areas. However, access to TBE vaccination depends on recommendations and funding by national or subnational decision-makers. We assessed if TBE vaccination could offer good value for money at incidences below this threshold. Methods: A closed-cohort Markov model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of TBE vaccination. We compared primary vaccination applied to the whole population (aged above 1 year) and to a subpopulation aged between 60 and 85 years to a scenario without vaccination. Since TBE incidence is often underestimated, we included under-ascertained TBE cases and non-CNS TBE infections. Germany was used as a case study due to the availability of detailed incidence data. Results: Our incidence threshold analysis showed that TBE vaccination offers good value for money well below the WHO threshold in most of the analyzed scenarios. Conclusions: Our results support a recommendation for TBE vaccination even in settings with low numbers of reported cases, especially for older patients. Furthermore, this analysis identified major research gaps regarding the costs, utilities, and clinical progression of TBE.

Despite the availability of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccines, the incidence of TBE is increasing. To understand the historical patterns of infection, we conducted a global meta-analysis of studies before December 2023 reporting human antibody prevalence against TBEV (TBE virus) among general or high-risk population groups stratified by country, collection year, serological method, and vaccination status. Pooled data were compared within groups over time by random-effects modeling. In total, 2403 articles were retrieved; 130 articles published since 1959 were included. Data were extracted from 96 general populations (117,620 participants) and 71 high-risk populations (53,986 participants) across 33 countries. Germany had the most population groups (21), and Poland had the most participants (44,688). Seven serological methods were used; conventional IgG/IgM ELISAs were the most common (44%). Four studies (1.7%) used NS1-ELISA serology. Between 1956–1991 and 1992–2022, anti-TBEV seroprevalence remained at ~2.75% across all population groups from “high-risk” areas (p = 0.458) but decreased within general populations (1.7% to 1%; p = 0.001) and high-risk populations (5.1% to 1.3%; p < 0.001), possibly due to differences in the study methodologies between periods. This global summary explores how serological methods can be used to assess TBE vaccination coverage and potential exposure to TBEV or measure TBE burden and highlights the need for standardized methodology when conducting TBE seroprevalence studies to compare across populations.

Pneumococcal disease has a high burden in adults in the United Kingdom (UK); however, the total burden is underestimated, principally because most cases of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are non-invasive. Research into pneumonia receives poor funding relative to its disease burden (global mortality, disability-adjusted life years, and years lived with disability), ranking just 20 out of 25 for investment in infectious diseases in the UK. The current accuracy of data for establishing incidence rates is questionable, and it is a reflection of the paucity of research that much of the background information available derives from nearly 30 years ago. Given the relationship between CAP and mortality (pneumonia accounts for 29,000 deaths per annum in the UK, and 5–15% of patients hospitalised with CAP die within 30 days of admission), and the increasing threat of antimicrobial resistance associated with inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, such neglect of a highly prevalent problem is concerning. In this Call to Action, we explore the poorly understood burden of CAP in the UK, discuss the importance of an accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment, and suggest how national collaboration could improve the management of an often life-threatening, yet potentially preventable disease.