Toshinori Hirai

Central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma consists of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and secondary CNS involvement by systemic lymphoma. This chapter focuses on the former. PCNSL is a relative rare disease, accounting for approximately 2.4–4.9% of all primary CNS tumors. It is an extra-nodal variant of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), confined to the brain, leptomeninges, spinal cord, and eyes, with no systemic involvement. Recently, elderly patients (≥ 60 years) are increasing. Histologically, B cell blasts, which originate from late germinal center exit B cell, are growing and homing in CNS. Immunohistochemically, these cells are positive for PAX5, CD19, CD20, CD22, and CD79a. PCNSL shows relatively characteristic appearances on CT, MR imaging, and PET. Treatment first line of PCNSL is HD-MTX-based chemotherapy with or without rituximab and irradiation. Severe side-effect of this treatment is delayed onset neurotoxicity, which cause of cognitive impairment. Therefore, combined chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy with reduced-dose irradiation is more recommended for elderly patients. There is no established standard care for relapse of the PCNSLs. Temsirolimus, lenalidomide, temozolomide, and Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib are candidates for refractory patients. The prognosis of PCNSL has significantly improved over the last decades (median OS: 26 months, 5-year survival: 31%). Younger than 60 age and WHO performance status less than < or = 1 are associated with a significantly better overall survival. Keywords Primary central nervous system lymphoma PCNSL Epidemiology Genetic and epigenetic alteration Radiographic imaging Chemotherapy Irradiation Prognosis

We report a 3-month-old boy with Kasabach-Merritt Syndrome (KMS) with an occipital haemangioma who underwent successful transarterial embolization (TAE) with cellulose porous beads (CPBs). As his response to steroids and coil embolization was inadequate, we performed TAE with CPBs, carefully preventing their migration via dangerous anastomoses. The tumour blush decreased, there were no complications, all coagulation tests were immediately normalized and the tumor size decreased gradually. TAE with CPBs is useful for the treatment of KMS.

Japan's largest platform for academic e-journals: J-STAGE is a full text database for reviewed academic papers published by Japanese societies

Thrombolytic therapy is effective in selected patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Therefore, identification of a marker that reflects the age of thrombus is of particular concern. This pilot study aimed to identify a marker that reflects the time after onset in human aspirated DVT. We histologically and immunohistochemically analyzed 16 aspirated thrombi. The times from onset to aspiration ranged from 5 to 60 days (median of 13 days). Paraffin sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and antibodies for fibrin, glycophorin A, integrin α2bβ3, macrophage markers (CD68, CD163, and CD206), CD34, and smooth muscle actin (SMA). All thrombi were immunopositive for glycophorin A, fibrin, integrin α2bβ3, CD68, CD163, and CD206, and contained granulocytes. Almost all of the thrombi had small foci of CD34- or SMA-immunopositive areas. CD68- and CD163-immunopositive cell numbers were positively correlated with the time after onset, while the glycophorin A-immunopositive area was negatively correlated with the time after onset. In double immunohistochemistry, CD163-positive cells existed predominantly among the CD68-immunopositive macrophage population. CD163-positive macrophages were closely localized with glycophorin A, CD34, or SMA-positive cell-rich areas. These findings indicate that CD163 macrophage and erythrocyte contents could be markers for evaluation of the age of thrombus in DVT. Additionally, CD163 macrophages might play a role in organization of the process of venous thrombus.

Diagnostic imaging is undoubtedly important in modern medicine, and final clinical decisions are often made based on it. Fortunately, Japan has the highest numbers of diagnostic imaging instruments, such as CT and MRI devices, and boasts easy access to them as well as a high level of diagnostic accuracy. In consequence, a very large number of imaging examinations are performed, but diagnostic instruments are installed in so many medical facilities that expert management of these examinations tends to be insufficient. Particularly, in order to avoid risks, clinicians have recently become indifferent to indications of imaging modalities and tend to rely on CT or MRI resulting in increasing the number of imaging examinations in Japan. This is a serious problem from the viewpoints of avoidance of unnecessary exposure and medical economy. Under these circumstances, the Japan Radiological Society and Japanese College of Radiology jointly initiated the preparation of new guidelines for diagnostic imaging. However, the field of diagnostic imaging is extremely wide, and it is impossible to cover all diseases. Therefore, in drafting the guidelines, we selected important diseases and focused on “showing evidence and suggestions in the form of clinical questions (CQs)” concerning clinically encountered questions and “describing routine imaging techniques presently considered to be standards to guarantee the quality of imaging examinations”. In so doing, we adhered to the basic principles of assuming the readers to be “radiologists specializing in diagnostic imaging”, “simultaneously respecting the global standards and attending to the situation in Japan”, and “making the guidelines consistent with those of other scientific societies related to imaging”. As a result, the guidelines became the largest ever, consisting of 152 CQs, nine areas of imaging techniques, and seven reviews, but no other guidelines in the world summarize problems concerning diagnostic imaging in the form of CQs. In this sense, the guidelines are considered to reflect the abilities of diagnostic radiologists in Japan. The contents of the guidelines are essential knowledge for radiologists, but we believe that they are also of use to general clinicians and clinical radiological technicians. While the number and contents of CQs are still insufficient, and while chapters such as those on imaging in children and emergency imaging need to be supplemented, the guidelines will be serially improved through future revisions. Lastly, we would like to extend our sincere thanks to the 153 members of the drafting committee who authored the guidelines, 12 committee chairpersons who coordinated their efforts, six members of the secretariat, and affiliates of related scientific societies who performed external evaluation.