Wei-Wei Zhu
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Wei-Wei Zhu has a total of 7 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Lin Zhao
Department of Cardiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
2 shared publications - Dongfang He
Capital Med Univ, Beijing Chaoyang Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
1 shared publication - Jian Chen
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong 519000, China; Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao University Joint Laboratory of Interventional Medicine, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China
1 shared publication - Junyao Wang1 shared publication
- Mingxia Zhao
Department of Neurology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
1 shared publication - Qiming Dong
Department of Internal Medicine, Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Towson, MD 21204, USA
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 8 June 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Preferential Recruitment of Monocyte into the Brain is Orchestrated by VCAM-1 Expression
The restriction of normal blood flow is the cause of many diseases including stroke and coronary artery diseases. To study the consequences of vessel blockade, previous models mainly focused on major arteries and have been well studied. However, the sequela from interruption of capillary vessels by microemboli was less well characterized. In this study, we exploited polystyrene microspheres as a mimicry of microemboli and found that microspheres of this size can be trapped in capillary vessels of all organs without causing apparent acute morbidities of the host. Interestingly, we accidentally found significantly increased recruitment of monocyte to the brain vasculature expressing low levels of Ly6C expression, but not to other organs. Further study revealed the spleen is the major origin of the recruited monocyte. Most importantly, VCAM-1 which is constitutively expressed on mouse brain vasculature orchestrates the recruitment of monocyte. Blockade of VCAM-1 in mice can substantially reduce monocyte recruitment. Interestingly, monocytes get activated through TNF- signaling which likely happens in the spleen instead of the brain. Collectively, we found a unique monocyte recruitment strategy in the brain comparing to other orangs, in response to capillary blockade induced by polystyrene microspheres.
- 8 June 2023
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Open AccessPreferential Recruitment of Monocyte into the Brain is Orchestrated by VCAM-1 Expression
The restriction of normal blood flow is the cause of many diseases including stroke and coronary artery diseases. To study the consequences of vessel blockade, previous models mainly focused on major arteries and have been well studied. However, the sequela from interruption of capillary vessels by microemboli was less well characterized. In this study, we exploited polystyrene microspheres as a mimicry of microemboli and found that microspheres of this size can be trapped in capillary vessels of all organs without causing apparent acute morbidities of the host. Interestingly, we accidentally found significantly increased recruitment of monocyte to the brain vasculature expressing low levels of Ly6C expression, but not to other organs. Further study revealed the spleen is the major origin of the recruited monocyte. Most importantly, VCAM-1 which is constitutively expressed on mouse brain vasculature orchestrates the recruitment of monocyte. Blockade of VCAM-1 in mice can substantially reduce monocyte recruitment. Interestingly, monocytes get activated through TNF- signaling which likely happens in the spleen instead of the brain. Collectively, we found a unique monocyte recruitment strategy in the brain comparing to other orangs, in response to capillary blockade induced by polystyrene microspheres.
- Open Access
- 6 January 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
- Vol. 17 (1) , 1-7
Effect of diabetes mellitus on long-term outcomes after repeat drug-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis
Whether diabetes mellitus (DM) is a predictor of long-term adverse clinical outcomes after repeat drug eluting stent (DES) implantation for DES in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains controversial. We sought to evaluate the effect of DM on the long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing repeat DES implantation for DES-ISR lesions. In the present study, 254 patients with DES-ISR were divided into DM or non-DM groups according to the presence or absence of DM. All patients received repeat 2nd generation DES implantation for DES-ISR. The occurrences of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) over a 2-year follow-up period were compared between the two groups. MACEs were defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). MACE free survival was investigated with Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with MACEs. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between groups, except for the prevalence of early restenosis (lower) in the DM group. Differences in angiographic and procedural characteristics were not significant between groups. The rates of 2-year MACE (30.9 vs. 26.0%; P = 0.453) and TLR (24.7 vs. 19.7%; P = 0.411) were similar between groups. MACE-free survival and TLR-free survival were also similar between groups (P = 0.441 and P = 0.807). Subgroup analysis suggested a significant difference in the MACE (39.0 vs.15.3%, P < 0.001) and TLR occurrence (30.5 vs.8.2%, P < 0.001) and TLR-free survival (lower in early subgroup, P < 0.001) between early and late occurrence of ISR in the non-DM group of patients but not in the DM group. After adjustment for all significant clinical variables, Cox regression analysis indicated that DM was not associated with MACEs (hazard ratio [HR] 1.531, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.882-2.658, P =0.130). Non-focal type ISR and early ISR were predictors of MACEs (HR 2.671, 95% CI 1.468-4.858,P = 0.001; HR 4.703, 95% CI 2.725-8.117, P < 0.001, respectively). Patients with DM have similar 2-year clinical outcomes to patients without DM when repeat 2nd generation DES was used for treatment of DES-ISR. DM is not the predictor of long-term prognosis in patients undergoing repeat 2nd generation DES for DES-ISR.
- 6 January 2017
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
- Vol. 17 (1) , 1-7
Open AccessEffect of diabetes mellitus on long-term outcomes after repeat drug-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis
Whether diabetes mellitus (DM) is a predictor of long-term adverse clinical outcomes after repeat drug eluting stent (DES) implantation for DES in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains controversial. We sought to evaluate the effect of DM on the long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing repeat DES implantation for DES-ISR lesions. In the present study, 254 patients with DES-ISR were divided into DM or non-DM groups according to the presence or absence of DM. All patients received repeat 2nd generation DES implantation for DES-ISR. The occurrences of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) over a 2-year follow-up period were compared between the two groups. MACEs were defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR). MACE free survival was investigated with Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with MACEs. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar between groups, except for the prevalence of early restenosis (lower) in the DM group. Differences in angiographic and procedural characteristics were not significant between groups. The rates of 2-year MACE (30.9 vs. 26.0%; P = 0.453) and TLR (24.7 vs. 19.7%; P = 0.411) were similar between groups. MACE-free survival and TLR-free survival were also similar between groups (P = 0.441 and P = 0.807). Subgroup analysis suggested a significant difference in the MACE (39.0 vs.15.3%, P < 0.001) and TLR occurrence (30.5 vs.8.2%, P < 0.001) and TLR-free survival (lower in early subgroup, P < 0.001) between early and late occurrence of ISR in the non-DM group of patients but not in the DM group. After adjustment for all significant clinical variables, Cox regression analysis indicated that DM was not associated with MACEs (hazard ratio [HR] 1.531, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.882-2.658, P =0.130). Non-focal type ISR and early ISR were predictors of MACEs (HR 2.671, 95% CI 1.468-4.858,P = 0.001; HR 4.703, 95% CI 2.725-8.117, P < 0.001, respectively). Patients with DM have similar 2-year clinical outcomes to patients without DM when repeat 2nd generation DES was used for treatment of DES-ISR. DM is not the predictor of long-term prognosis in patients undergoing repeat 2nd generation DES for DES-ISR.