Carmen Alina Gizea

Background/Objectives: Digitalization of intensive care units (ICUs) aims to enhance patient safety and efficiency through standardized documentation, real-time data integration, and clinical decision support. This study evaluated whether the implementation of a patient data management system (PDMS) was associated with improvements in quality of care, infection prevention, and patient outcomes in a trauma ICU. Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective, before–after cohort study comparing a pre-digitalization period (2021–2022) with a post-digitalization period (2025). Consecutive adult trauma ICU admissions were analyzed. The exposure was unit-wide adoption of a PDMS implemented in 2024. The primary outcome was ICU length of stay (LOS); secondary outcomes included ICU mortality, nosocomial infection rates (episodes per 1000 ICU-days), ventilation- and antibiotic-days, device utilization, and infection epidemiology. Prespecified sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: A total of 108 patients were included (43 pre- and 65 post-digitalization). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Median ICU LOS decreased from 13.0 to 6.0 days (p = 0.02). Mortality declined from 18.6% to 6.2% (p = 0.06), and crude infection rates decreased from 42.2 to 30.8 per 1000 ICU-days (rate ratio 0.73; p = 0.28). Adjusted analyses showed no statistically significant differences for mortality (aOR 0.40; p = 0.45), infection rates (aIRR 0.88; p = 0.68), LOS (aRR 1.04; p = 0.87), ventilation-days (aRR 0.86; p = 0.65), or antibiotic-days (aRR 0.70; p = 0.30). Per-patient rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia and bloodstream infection were significantly lower after digitalization (both p = 0.04), and Acinetobacter spp. infections decreased markedly (7 to 0 cases; p = 0.001). Findings were consistent after exclusion of ICU stays < 24 h. Conclusions: ICU digitalization was associated with shorter unadjusted ICU stays and favorable trends in infection and mortality outcomes, though adjusted analyses were neutral. Larger multicenter studies incorporating device-day denominators and time-to-event analyses are needed to confirm the causal impact of digital transformation on ICU quality of care.

Background: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) remain a significant challenge in intensive care units (ICUs), especially in trauma settings where invasive interventions are frequent. This study aimed to assess the impact of a structured quality improvement project (QIP) on nosocomial infection rates and patient outcomes in a polytrauma ICU. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study at the “Pius Brînzeu” County Emergency Clinical Hospital, Timișoara. A total of 78 ICU trauma patients were included: 35 in the Pre-QIP group and 43 in the Post-QIP group. The QIP integrated evidence-based interventions, including hand hygiene reinforcement, individualized protective equipment, improved nurse staffing, and antimicrobial stewardship. Outcomes analyzed included nosocomial infection rate, ICU length of stay, antibiotic use, mechanical ventilation days, and mortality. Multivariable logistic, linear, and Poisson regression models were applied to control for confounding variables. Results: The Post-QIP group showed a significantly lower number of infections per patient (0.60 ± 0.95 vs. 1.41 ± 1.97, p = 0.03) and a trend toward lower mortality (0.19 vs. 0.34, p = 0.18). While ICU stay, antibiotic use, and ventilation days decreased post-QIP, these changes were not statistically significant. ISS and Charlson scores were consistent predictors of worse outcomes. Conclusions: Implementation of a targeted, multidisciplinary QIP was associated with improved infection control and patient outcomes. These results support the feasibility and value of structured infection prevention strategies in resource-constrained ICU settings.

Nowadays, fluid resuscitation of multiple trauma patients is still a challenging therapy. Existing therapies for volume replacement in severe haemorrhagic shock can lead to adverse reactions that may be fatal for the patient. Patients presenting with multiple trauma often develop hemorrhagic shock, which triggers a series of metabolic, physiological and cellular dysfunction. These disorders combined, lead to complications that significantly decrease survival rate in this subset of patients. Volume and electrolyte resuscitation is challenging due to many factors that overlap. Poor management can lead to post-resuscitation systemic inflammation causing multiple organ failure and ultimately death. In literature, there is no exact formula for this purpose, and opinions are divided. This paper presents a review of modern techniques and current studies regarding the management of fluid resuscitation in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock. According to the literature and from clinical experience, all aspects regarding post-resuscitation period need to be considered. Also, for every case in particular, emergency therapy management needs to be rigorously respected considering all physiological, biochemical and biological parameters.